AN ANALYSIS OF SURGICAL SHUNTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION AT AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Zubair Luqman
  • Muhammad Rizwan Khan
  • Mahboob Alam
  • Muslim Atiq
  • Ziad Sophie

Abstract

Background: The objective of our study was to analyze the outcome of surgical shunts for the management of variceal bleeding associated with portal hypertension. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis carried out at The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi of medical records from Jan 1991 – Dec 2001. The main outcome measures included morbidity and mortality associated with the surgical procedure, and the long term outcome in terms of recurrent bleeding. Results: A total of 30 patients underwent a shunt procedure during the study period. The mean age was 35 ± 13.75 years, with 22 (73%) males and 8 (27%) females. The indication for surgery was recurrent bleeding in 23 (77%) patients, and active bleeding refractory to endoscopic therapy in 7 (23%) patients. According to Child-Pugh classification, 19 (63%) patients were classified as Childs’ A, 7 (23%) as Childs’ B, and 4 (13%) as Childs’ C. The surgical procedure included distal splenorenal shunt in 25 (83%), central splenorenal shunt in 3 (10%), and portocaval shunt in 2 (7%) cases. Five patients expired within 30 days of surgical intervention with mortality rate of 16%. Three of these patients were Childs’ C, as compared to one each in Childs’ A and B, the difference being statistically significant. Similarly, the frequency of encephalopathy and recurrent bleeding was also significantly higher in patients with Childs’ class C. Conclusions: Surgical shunts may be considered as a reasonable alternative for long term control of recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with good hepatic reserve.Keywords: Variceal bleeding, Portal hypertension, distal splenorenal shunt

References

Boyer TD. Natural history of portal hypertension. Clin Liver Dis 1997;1:31-7.

Smith JL, Graham DY. Variceal hemorrhage: A critical evaluation of survival analysis. Gastroenterology 1982; 82:968-73

Rubin RA, O'Brien CB, Haskal ZJ, Cope C, Brass CA. Decreased survival following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting for Child C patients with high Apache II scores. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;90:556-63

DeFranchis R, Primignani M. Why do varices bleed? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992;21:85-97.

Grace ND, Bhattachrya K. Pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage. Clin Liver Dis 1997;1:59-66.

The North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices: Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1998; 319:983-88.

Vargas HE, Gerber D, Abu-Elmagd K. Management of portal hypertension-related bleeding. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79(1):1-22

Bernard B, Lebrac D, Mathurin P, Opolon P, Poynard T. Beta adrenergic anatagonists in the prevention of gastrointestinal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 1997; 25:63-70.

Laine L, Cook D. Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Ann Int Med 1995; 123:280-7.

LaBerge JM, Ring EJ, Gordon RL, Lake JR, Doherty MM, Somberg KA, et al. Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with wallstent endoprosthesis: results in 100 patients. Radiology1993; 187:413-20.

Mercado MP, Morales JC, Granados J, Distal splenorenal shunt vs. 10-mm low-diameter mesocaval shunt for variceal hemorrhage. Am J Surg 1996;171:1-5.

Orozco H, Mercado MA, Takahashi T, Hemandez-Ortiz J, Capellan JF, Garsia-Tsao G. Elective treatment of bleeding varices with the Sugiura operation over 10 years. Am J Surg 1992; 163:585-9.

Ringe B, Lang H, Tusch G, Pichlmayr R. Role of liver transplantation in the management of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. World J Surg 1994; 18:233-9.

Orozco H, Mercado MA, Chan C, Guillen-Navarro E, Lopez-Martinez LM.A comparative study of the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage with beta-blockers, transendoscopic sclerotherapy, and surgery: a prospective, controlled, and randomized trial during 10 years. Ann Surg 2000; 232(2):216-9.

Jenkins RL, Gedaly R, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA, Gordon F, Lewis WD. Distal splenorenal shunt: role, indications, and utility in the era of liver transplantation. Arch Surg 1999; 134(4):416-20.

Henderson JM, Kutner MH, Millikan WJ Jr, Galambos JT, Riepe SP, Brooks WS et al. Endoscopic variceal sclerosis compared with distal splenorenal shunt to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Ann Int Med 1990; 1:649-54.

Rikkers LF, Jin G, Burnett DA, Buchi KN, Cormier RA. Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for variceal hemorrhage: Late results of a randomized trial. Am J Surg 1993; 165:27-32.

Spina GP, Hender JM, Rikkers LF, Teres J, Burroughs AK, Conn HO et al. Distal splenorenal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials. J Hepatol 1992; 16:338-45.

Spina GP, Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Cosentino F, Zambelli A, Passoni GR, et al. Distal splenorenal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal re-bleeding. Ann Surg 1990; 211:178-86.

Teres J, Bordas JM, Bravo D, Visa J, Grande L, Gracia-Valdecasas JC et al. Sclerotherapy vs distal splenorenal shunt in the elective treatment of variceal hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 1987; 7:430-36.

Infante-Rivard C, Esnaola S, Villeneuve JP. Role of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy in the long-term management of variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1989; 96:1087-92.

Gimson AE, Ramage JK, Panos MZ, Hayllar K, Harrison PM, Williams R et al. Randomized trial of variceal banding ligation versus injection sclerotherapy for bleeding esophageal varices. Lancet 1993; 342:391-4.

Rossle M, Haag K, Ochs A, Sellinger M, Noldge G, Paramau JM et al. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:165-71.

Rosch J, Keller FS. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: present status, comparison with endoscopic therapy and shunt surgery, and future prospectives. World J Surg 2001; 25:337-46.

Orozco H, Mercado MA.The evolution of portal hypertension surgery: lessons from 1000 operations and 50 Years' experience. Arch Surg 2000;135(12):1389-93.

Rikkers LF, Jin G, Langnas AN, Shaw BW Jr. Shunt surgery during the era of liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1997; 226(1):51-7.

The North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1998;319(15): 983-9

Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60:646-68.

Rees CJ, Hudson M, Record CO. Therapeutic modalities in portal hypertension. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 9:9–111.

Henderson JM. Portal hypertension and shunt surgery. Adv Surg 1993;26:233-57

Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Luketic VA, Purdum PP 3rd, Shiffman ML, Cole PE, Tisnado J, Simmons S. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy for the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997;126(11):849-57.

Stipa S, Balducci G, Ziparo V, Stipa F, Lucandri G.Total shunting and elective management of variceal bleeding. World J Surg 1994; 18(2):200-4.

Hermann RE, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, Mayes JT, Geisinger MA, Agnor C.Fifty years of surgery for portal hypertension at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Lessons and prospects. Ann Surg 1995; 221(5):459-66.

Rikkers LF. Surgical complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers MB, Mattox KL eds. Textbook of Surgery: The biological basis of modern surgical practice. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders, 2001: 1060-75.

Nagasue N, Kohno H, Ogawa Y, Yukaya H, Tamada R, Sasaki Y, et al. Appraisal of distal splenorenal shunt in the treatment of esophageal varices: an analysis of prophylactic, emergency, and elective shunts. World J Surg 1989; 13: 92-9.

Orozco H, Mercado MA, Garcia JG, Hernandez-Ortiz J, Tielve M, Chan C, et al. Selective shunts for portal hypertension: current of a 21-year experience. Liver Transpl Surg 1997;3: 475-80.

Henderson MJ, Warren WD, Millikan WJ. Distal splenorenal shunt with splenopancreatic disconnection: a 4-year assessment. Ann Surg 1989; 10: 332-41.

Henderson JM, Nagle A, Curtas S, Geisinger M, Barnes D. Surgical shunts and tips for variceal decompression in the 1990s. Surgery 2000;128: 540-7.

Khaitiyar JS, Luthra SK, Prasad N, Ratnakar N, Daruwala DK. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt: a comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:492-7.

Knetchle SJ, Alessandro AM, Armbrust MJ, Musat A, Kalyoglu M. Surgical portosystemic shunts for treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding: outcome and effect on liver function. Surgery 1999;126:708-13.

D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review. Hepatology 1995;22(1):332-54

Helton WS, Maves R, Wicks K, Johansen K. Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunts vs surgical shunts in good-risk cirrhotic patients. A case control comparison. Arch Surg 2001;136:17-20

Mercado MA, Morales-Linares JC, Granados-Garcia J, Gomez-Mendez TJ, Chan C, Orozco H. Distal splenorenal shunt versus 10-mm low-diameter mesocaval shunt for variceal hemorrhage. Am J Surg 1996;171(6):591-5.

Knechtle SJ, Kalayoglu M, D'Alessandro AM, Pirsch JD, Armbrust MJ, Sproat IA, et al. Portal hypertension: surgical management in the 1990s. Surgery 1994;116(4): 687-93

Rossle M, Siegerstetter V, Huber M, Ochs A.The first decade of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): state of the art. Liver 1998;18(2):73-89.

Kerlan RK Jr, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL, Ring EJ.Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: current status. AJR 1995; 164(5):1059-66.

Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Luketic VA, Purdum PP 3rd, Shiffman ML, DeMeo J, Cole PE, Tisnado J. The natural history of portal hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Gastroenterology 1997;112(3):889-98.

Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Biddle AK, Mauro MA, Brown RS Jr. Decision-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus distal splenorenal shunt for portal hypertension. Hepatology 1999;29(5):1399-405

Rikkers LF, Sorrell WT, Jin G. Which portosystemic shunt is best? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992;21(1):179-96.

Laine L, Cook D. Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123(4):280-7.

Henderson JM, Kutner MH, Millikan WJ Jr, Galambos JT, Riepe SP, Brooks WS, Bryan FC, Warren WD.Endoscopic variceal sclerosis compared with distal splenorenal shunt to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990;112(4):262-9.

D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. The treatment of portal hypertension: a meta-analytic review. Hepatology 1995; 22(1):332-54.

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2004): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.