EVALUATION OF MODIFIED ALVARADO, RIPASA AND LINTULA SCORING SYSTEM AS DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Authors

  • Sana Khan
  • Muhammad Usama Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad.
  • Yasir Basir
  • Saad Muhammad
  • Muhammad Jawad
  • Tooba Khan
  • Ahmed Usman
  • Asim Abbas

Abstract

Background: Commonest surgical emergency presenting to emergency departments with abdominal pain is acute appendicitis. Thus, to enable quick and accurate diagnosis of the condition various scoring systems have been developed. Among these, Alvarado and its modified version (Modified Alvarado) are the commonest. Whereas Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score showed promising results in Asian population. Similarly, Lintula score, which was initially developed for paediatric population, has now been validated for elderly too. This study is aimed to compare these in our regional population. Method: Project included consecutive 125 clinically suspected acute appendicitis patients. All were scored using Modified Alvarado, RIPASA and Lintula systems. Final diagnosis was based on histopathologic evaluation of excised specimen.  Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were computed for all these systems by using SPSS statistical software and ROC curves were plotted. Results: With cut-off of 7, Modified Alvarado was 62% specific, 83% sensitive and 65% accurate. While PPV and NPV were 94% and 33%, respectively. Whereas RIPASA yielded better results, i.e. sensitivity of 98.4%, specificity of 87%, PPV of 97%, NPV of 77% and diagnostic accuracy of 92%. Whereas Lintula showed sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 87%, PPV of 96%, NPV of 40 and accuracy of 73%. Conclusion: RIPASA demonstrated higher sensitivity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy than Modified Alvarado and Lintula scores. Hence this study approves use of RIPASA score in the region. However further research on the subject is required to back this inference.Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Modified Alvarado score; RIPASA score; Lintula score

Author Biography

Muhammad Usama, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad.

Postgraduate Trainee, Surgical C Ward, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad.

References

Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med 1999;63(3):137–40.

Cuschieri A. The small intestine and vermiform appendix; In: Cuscheri A, Giles GR, Mossa AR, editors. Essential surgical practice. 3rd ed. London: Butter worth Heinman, 1995; p.1325–8.

Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Development of the RIPASA score:a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010;51(3):220–5.

Stone HH, Sanders SL, Martin JD. Perforated appendicitis in children. Surgery 1971;69(5):673–9.

Graham JM, Pokorny WJ, Harberg FJ. Acute appendicitis in preschool age children. Am J Surg 1980;139(2):247–50.

Gilbert SR, Emmens RW, Putnam TC. Appendicitis in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985;161(3):261–5.

Curran TJ, Muenchow SK. The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children using peritoneal drainage. Results from public hospital. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28(2):204–8.

Pearl RH, Hale DA, Molloy M, Schutt DC, Jaques DP. Pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30(2):173–81.

Surana R, O’Donnell B, Puri P. Appendicitis diagnosed following active observation does not increase morbidity in children. Pediatr Surg Int 1995;10(2-3):76–8.

Erdem H, Çetinkünar S, Daş K, Reyhan E, Değer C, Aziret M, et al. Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19(47):9057–62.

Kanumba ES, Mabula JB, Rambau P, Chalya PL. Modified Alvarado Scoring System as a diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Surg 2011;11:4.

Kalan M, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ, Rich AJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis:a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994;76(6):418–9.

Chong CF, Adil MI, Thien A, Suyoi A, Mackie AJ, Tin AS, et al. Evaluation of the RIPASA score: A new scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010;51(3):220–5.

Lintula H, Pesonen E, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Eskelinen M. A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005;390(2):164–70.

Yoldas O, Karaca T, Tez M. External validation of lintula score in Turkish acute appendicitis patients. Int J Surg 2012;10(1):25–7.

Gilmore OJ, Browett JP, Griffin PH, Ross IK, Brodribb AJ, Cooke TJ, et al. Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. Lancet 1975;2(7932):421–4.

Antel J, Rivera L, Landenberg B, Halm G, Fatava MA, Brown CV. Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203(6):849–56.

Shuaib A, Shuaib A, Fakhra Z, Marafi B, Alsharaf K, Behbehani A. Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Med 2017;8(4):276–80.

Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: Computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004;141(7):537–46.

Published

2020-02-08