PREDICTIVE VALUE OF EARLY VIRIOLOGICAL RESPONSE FOR SUSTAINED VIRIOLOGICAL RESPONSE IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERFERON THERAPY

Authors

  • Amna Awan Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Rawalpindi Medical College, Rawalpindi
  • Muhammad Umar Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Hamama tul Bushra Khaar Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Afifa Kulsoom Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Zahid Minhas Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Saima Anbreen Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Nasir Habib Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Wasiq Mumtaz Department of Medicine, Unit 1, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpidi-Pakistan
  • Farhan Habib Department of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha

Abstract

Background:  Hepatitis is a major public health problem in Pakistan due to its strong association with liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. In Pakistan, conventional interferon therapy along with Ribavirin is favoured especially in Government funded programs for treatment of  Hepatitis C,  over the more expensive Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin combination therapy as recommended by Pakistan society of Gastroenterology and GI endoscopy due to its favourable results observed in genotype 3 which is the  dominant genotype of this region. Objective of our study was to assess the viriological responses with standard interferon therapy and to determine the predictive values of early viriological response (EVR) for Sustained Viriological Response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with standard interferon therapy. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted on patients with chronic hepatitis C having received standard interferon and ribavirin therapy for six months. EVR and SVR were noted for analysis. Positive and negative predictive values of EVR on SVR were calculated. Results: Out of the total sample (N=3075), 1946(63.3%) patients were tested for EVR. 1386 (71.2%) were positive while 560(28.8%) were negative while 516 (16.8%) were tested for SVR. Two hundred and eighty-five (55.2%) were positive while 231 (44.8%) were negative. EVR and SVR tested were N=117. Positive predictive value of EVR on SVR was 67.1% and negative predictive value was 65.8%. Statistically significant association between EVR and SVR was determined with Chi square statistic of 11.8 (p-value <0.0001). Conclusion: EVR is a good predictor of response of patients to standard interferon and ribavirin therapy. In the absence of an EVR, it seems imperative to stop further treatment. Virilogical responses with conventional interferon therapy are comparable to those of pegylated interferon therapy so adoption of conventional INF therapy is justified in terms of its cost effectiveness especially in resource constrained nations like Pakistan.

References

Alavian SM, Tabatabaei SV. Conventional Interferon Alpha Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease, Six versus Twelve Months? A Meta-Analysis. Int J Nephrol Urol 2009;1(1):4–13.

WHO. Hepatitis C. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/

Ahmed B, Ali S, Ali I, Mahmud N, Bashir S, Nawaz S. Conventional Interferon Therapy Response among Chronic HCV Patients in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. J Infect Dis Ther 2013;1:104.

Farooqi JI, Farooqi RJ. Conventional Interferon alfa-2b and Ribavirin for 12 versus 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008;18(10):620–4.

Ferenci P. Predicting the therapeutic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C: the role of viral kinetic studies. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53(1):15–8.

Abo AA, Sanai FM. Predictors of sustained viriologic response in hepatitis C genotype 4: beyond the usual suspects. Annal Saudi Med 2009;29(1):1–3.

Napoli N, Giannelli G, Parisi CV, Antonaci A, Maddalena G, Antonaci S. Predictive value of early virological response to treatment with different interferon-based regimens plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. New Microbiol 2005;28(1):13–21.

Davis GL, Wong JB, McHutchison JG, Manns MP, Harvey J, Albrecht J. Early Virologic Response to Treatment With Peginterferon Alfa-2b plus Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003;38(3):645–52.

Druyts E, Thorlund K, Wu P, Kanters S, Yaya S, Cooper CL, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a or Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56(7):961–7.

Farooqi JI, Farooqi RJ. Efficacy of Conventional Interferon alpha–2 b plus Ribavirin combination in the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C naive patients. Rawal Med J 2005;30(1):9–11.

Jadoon SM, Jadoon S, Muhammad I. Response to standard Interferon A2b and Ribavarin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C treatment naïve patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(4):164–6.

Shepherd J, Waugh N, Hewitson P. Combination therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4(33):1–67.

Lukasiewicz E, Gorfine M, Freedman LS, Pawlotsky JM, Schalm SW, Ferrari C, et al. Prediction of nonSVR to Therapy with Pegylated Interferon-α2a and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Patients after 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of treatment. J Viral Hepat 2010;17(5):345–51.

Chen CH, Yu ML. Evolution of Interferon-Based Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C. Hepar Rest Treat 2010;2010:140953.

Davis GL. Monitoring of viral levels during therapy of hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002;36(5 Suppl 1):S145–51.

Lo Re V 3rd, Amorosa VK, Localio AR, O'Flynn R, Teal V, Dorey-Stein Z, et al. Adherence toHepatitis C virus therapy and early viriologic outcomes . Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(2):186–93.

Witthöft T. Review of consensus interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Biologics 2008;2(4):635–43.

Published

2016-03-10

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 1 (2016): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.

Most read articles by the same author(s)