BEDSIDE MANNERS: DO WE CARE?
AbstractBackground: Teaching bedside manner might prove to be one of the most challenging tasks in medical education as it is not easy to structure or formalise such training. Besides, the rigorous training process for acquiring clinical and technical skills often overshadows the humanistic aspect of medical care. The aim of this study was to assess the perception of final year medical students as well as the faculty regarding the teaching and practice of bedside manner including a brief evaluation of students’ bedside manner. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving final year medical students from five medical colleges (n=193) and faculty from a single institution (n=29). Sample was selected using systematic random or convenient sampling techniques. Data was collected using self administered, anonymous, structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using SPSS-17. Results: While evaluating students’ bedside manner, 85% of the students reported they always take consent while interacting with a patient whereas, only 17% of the faculty members agreed with this. Only 3% of the faculty members reported that students take care of privacy of patients and none of them thought that students reassure a patient during an encounter whereas the percentages among students were 76% and 48%, respectively. Though students thought they need to improve, majority (56%) of them was confident of their bedside manner. On the other hand, 83% of the faculty members rated students’ bedside manner from fair to poor. A large proportion (69%) of the faculty members were not satisfied with the quality of teaching regarding bedside manner, reporting lack of focus on this particular aspect of medical care as the most important cause. Majority of the students (87%) believed doctors have a better bedside manner in private as compared to public hospitals. Conclusion: Students have an inflated evaluation of their bedside manner but majority felt a need to improve. A sharp contrast exists between students’ and faculty’s opinion regarding the practice of bedside manner by students. An outright lack of focus on bedside manner was reported as the most important cause for inadequate emphasis on teaching this particular aspect of medical care.Keywords: Bedside manners, medical care, medical education, medical student, consent, ethics
Silverman BD. Physician behavior and bedside manners: the influence of William Osler and The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25(1):58–61.
Haynes RB, McDonald HP, Garg AX. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical applications. JAMA 2002;288:2880–3.
Johna S, Rahman S. Humanity before science: Narrative medicine, clinical practice, and medical education. Perm J 2011;15(4):92–4.
Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, Wenghofer E, Jacques A, Klass D, et al. Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. JAMA 2007;298:993–1001.
Stewart M, Brown BJ, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49:796–804.
Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 2007;29:648–54.
Ioannidou F, Konstantikaki V. Empathy and emotional intelligence: what is it really about? Int J Caring Sci 2008;1(3):118–23.
Ucko BC. Poked and prodded again and again. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(5):1400–6.
Shapiro J. How do physicians teach empathy in the primary care setting? Acad Med 2002;7:323–8.
Hausberg MC, Hergert A, Kröger C, Bullinger M, Rose M, Andreas S. Enhancing medical students’ communication skills: development and evaluation of an undergraduate training program. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:16.
Boehm FH. Teaching Bedside Manners to Medical Students. Acad Med 2008;83:534.
Fazel I, Aghamolaei T. Attitudes toward learning communication skills among medical students of a university in Iran. Acta Med Iran 2011;49:625–9.
Shankar RP, Dubey KA, Mishra P, Deshpande YV, Chandrasekhar TS, Shivananda PC. Student attitudes towards communication skills training in a medical college in Western Nepal. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2006;19(1):71–84.
Anvik T, Grimstad H, Baerheim A, Bernt Fasmer O, Gude T, Hjortdahl P, et al. Medical students’ cognitive and affective attitudes towards learning and using communication skills –a nationwide cross-sectional study. Med Teach 2008;30:272–9.
Hafferty FW, Franks R, The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 1994;69:861–71.
Stern DT. In search of the informal curriculum: when and where professional values are taught. Acad Med 1998;73(10 Suppl):S28–30.
Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 1998;73:403–7.
Bellini LM, Baine M, Shea JA. Variation of mood and empathy during internship. JAMA 2002;287:3143–6.
Hojat M, Magione S, Nasca TJ, Rattner S, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS, et al. An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Med Educ 2004;38:934–41.
Weissmann PF, Branch WT, Gracey CF, Haidet P, Frankel RM. Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Acad Med 2006;81:661–7.
Reuler JB, Nardone DA. Role modeling in medical education. West J Med 1994;160:335–7.
Gracey CF, Haidet P, Branch WT, Weissmann P, Kern DE, Mitchell G, et al. Precepting Humanism: strategies for fostering the human dimensions of care in ambulatory settings. Acad Med 2005;80:21–8.
Shapiro J, Rucker L. Can poetry make better doctors? Teaching the humanities and arts to medical students and residents at the University of California, Irvine, College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003;78:953–7.
Kaba R, Sooriakumaran P. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int J Surg 2007;5(1):57–65.
Sokol KD. How the doctor’s nose has shortened over time; a historical overview of the truth-telling debate in the doctor-patient relationship. J R Soc Med 2006;99:632–636.
Conti AA, Gensini GF. Doctor-patient communication: a historical overview. Minerva Med 2008;99:411–5.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.