GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE

Authors

  • Nousheen Aziz
  • Sajida Yousfani
  • Irfanullah Soomro
  • Firdous Mumtaz

Abstract

Background: Molar pregnancy represents a significant burden of disease on the spectrum ofGestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD). The incidence appears to be quite high in South Asia. Theobjective of this study was to determine the frequency of GTD, and clinical presentation, managementand outcome of patients with molar pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive study wasconducted at Nuclear Institute of Medicine and Radiotherapy (NIMRA), Jamshoro from 1st Jan to 31stDec 2009. All patients diagnosed and registered as GTD were included in the study. The clinicalrecords of all molar patients were reviewed regarding presentation, treatment, and follow-up. Results:There were a total of 167 patients presenting with different female genital tract neoplasia at NIMRAduring the study period, including 39 (29.35%) cases of GTD. Hydatidiform mole was seen in 33(84.61%) patients. Complete mole in 31 (79.48%), partial mole in 2 (5.12%) patients, invasive mole in1 (2.56%) patient, and choriocarcinoma in 5 (12.82%) patients. The mean age of the patients was27±9.8 years. The highest incidence was found in nulliparous and para 1. Thirty-two patients hadsuction evacuation and 1 patient underwent hysterectomy. Patients received chemotherapy, 17(54.54%) patients followed protocol for 3–6 months. Conclusion: Frequency of molar pregnancy washigh, more common in low-parous, poor socioeconomic class women, and usually presented late.Keywords: Gestational trophoblastic disease, Hydatidiform mole, management, outcome, women

References

Gerulath AH. Gestational Trophoblastic Disease 2000. Available

from: http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/public/114E.CPG.pdf

Therasa kvichya S, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease in 2005. J

Med Assoc Thai 2005;88(2):119–23.

Howkins and Bourne. Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia or

Diseases. In Shaws (Ed) Textbook of Gynaecology, 14th edition.

Elsevier 2008:226.

Nizam K, Haider G, Memon N, Haider A. Gestational

Trophoblastic Disease: Experience at Nawabshah hospital. J

Ayub Med Coll 2009;21(1):94–97.

Zivaljevic M, Tesic M, Vujkov T, Rajovic J, Popovic M.

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. Archive of Oncology

;10(2):71–5.

Feltmate CM, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Current status of the

cytotoxic treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. CME J

Gynaecol Oncol 2002;7:10–5.

Tham BW, Everard JE, Tidy JA, Drew D, Hancock BW.

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease in the Asian population of

Northern England and North Wales. BJOG 2003;110:555–9.

Smith HO, Qualls CR, Prairie BA, Padilia LA, Rayburn WF, Key

CR. Trends in gestational choriocarcinoma: A 27 years

perspective. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:978–87.

Sadiq S, Panjwani S. Gestational trophoblastic disease experience

at the basic medical sciences institute, JPMC, Karachi. Pak J Med

Sci 2006;22:483–5.

Moodley M, Tunkyl K, Moodley J. Gestational Trophoblastic

syndrome: an audit of 112 patients. A South African Experience.

Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13(2):234–9.

Talati NJ. The Pattern of Benign Gestational trophoblastic disease

in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc 1998;48(10):296–300.

Kim SJ, Placental site trophoblastic tumor. Best Pract Res Clin

Obstet Gynaecol 2003;17:849–8.

Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Molar pregnancy. N Engl J Med

;360(16):1639–45.

Rauf B, Hassan L, Ahmed S. Management of Gestational

Trophoblastic Tumor: A Five-year Clinical Experience. J Coll

Physicians Surg Pak 2004;14(9):540–4.

Jain KA, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Pictorial review.

Ultrasound Q 2005;21:245–53.

Zhou Q, Lei XY, Xie Q, Cardoza JD. Sonographic and Doppler

Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gestational

Trophoblastic Disease. A 12-Year Experience. J Ultrasound Med

;24;15–24.

Marrow CP. Postmolar Trophoblastic Disease: Diagnosis,

management, and prognosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;27:211–

Wasim T. Gestational trophoblastic disease - A study. Ann King

Edward Med Uni 2001;7(2);129–30.

Batorfi J, Vegh G, Szepesi J, Szigetvari I, Doszpod J, Fulop V.

How long should patients be followed after molar pregnancy?

Analysis of serum hCG follow-up data. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol

Reprod Bio 2004;112(1);95–7.

Published

2012-03-01

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2012): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.