QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT OF INTRA-ORAL PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPHS AT THE UNDERGRADUATE DENTAL SCHOOL

Authors

  • Anum Khan Clinical Demonstrator, Islamic International Dental College and Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. G7/4, 7th Avenue, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Qasim Javed Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dental Sciences and Endodontics, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
  • Rida Iqbal House officer, Islamic International Dental College and Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. G-7/4, 7th Avenue, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Fareeha Khan House officer, Islamic International Dental College and Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. G-7/4, 7th Avenue, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Syed Rashid Habib Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background The three fundamental principles of radiation protection are justification, dose optimization or limitation and subsequently following the As Low as Reasonably Practicable- (ALARP) principle. Quality assurance (QA) program for dental radiography is important in order to yield results with maximum diagnostic value, minimize errors, aid in interpretation, avoid unnecessary repetition of radiographs and therefore, additional radiation exposure. Methods This standard based audit was conducted at an undergraduate and postgraduate teaching hospital. One thousand and sixty four intra oral periapical radiographs were graded according to the set standards by NRPB by 3 examiners. Data were analyzed with SPSS-24. Results Out of the 532 conventional periapical radiographs, 313 radiographs were Grade 1, 177 radiographs were Grade 2 and 42 radiographs were Grade 3, requiring a repeat radiograph. For 532 digitally taken periapical radiographs, 255 radiographs were Grade 1, 192 radiographs were Grade 2 and 85 radiographs were Grade 3 and diagnostically unacceptable. Considering the aforementioned results, the findings of the first cycle did not meet the standards. Conclusion According to the results of the quality assurance audit, the radiographs were below the standards set by NRPB. Recommendations were made for improvement measures in the radiology department and plan to re-audit after six months.Keywords: Radiographs, Quality Assurance; Audit

References

Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Biological Effects of Radiation from Dental Radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;105(2):275–81.

Government of UK. The Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999. [Internet].1999. [Cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/3232/pdfs/uksi_19993232_en.pdf

Government of UK. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017. [Internet].2017. [Cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/1322/pdfs/uksi_20171322_en.pdf

WHO. Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology. [Internet]. World Health Organization 1980. [cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/39095/1/9241541644 .pdf

Ngoye WM, Motto JA, Muhogora WE. Quality Control Measures in Tanzania: Is it Done? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2015;46(3):S23–30.

Jabbari N, Zeinali A, Rahmatnezhad L. Patient dose from radiographic rejects/repeats in radiology centers of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Health 2012;4(2):94–100.

Lindell B, Dunster HJ, Valentin J. International Commission on Radiological Protection: History, Policies and Procedures. [Internet]. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, SE. 1998; 171:16. [cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.icrp.org/docs/histpol.pdf

European Commission. European Guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology, Radiation Protection 136. [Internet]. 2004. [Cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/136.pdf

Hirschmann PN. Guidelines on radiology standards for primary dental care: a resumé. Royal College of Radiologists and the National Radiological Protection Board. Br Dent J 1995;178(5):165–67.

Rout J, Brown J. Ionizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 3. quality assurance in dental radiography. Dent Update 2012;39(5):334–9.

Chong BS, Miller J, Sidhu S. The quality of radiographs accompanying endodontic referrals to a health authority clinic. Br Dent J 2015;219(2):69–72.

Emanuel RJ, Hussain N, O’Sullivan M. A retrospective audit of radiograph quality: completing the audit cycle. Qual Prim Care 2005;13(3):149–52.

Salami A, Al Halabi M, Hussein I, Kowash M. An Audit on the Quality of Intra-Oral Digital Radiographs Taken in a Postgraduate Paediatric Dentistry Setting. Oral Health Dent Manag 2017;16(1):1–4.

Tatapudi R, Myla S, UpendraGurugubelli J, Meenakshi K, SravaniBandru R. Comparison between the commonly used radiographic techniques for intra oral imaging in dentistry-A questionnaire study. Int J Dent Res 2017;5(2):157–62.

Ali S.A, Hussain M, Shahzad M, Irfan F. Quality Analysis of Periapical Radiographs Taken by Dental Assistants. J Liaquat Univ Med Health Sci 2018;17(4):260–4.

Okano T, Sur J. Radiation dose and protection in dentistry. Japanese Dent Sci Rev 2010;46(2):112–21.

Mallya S, Lam E. White and Pharoah's Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. Mosby; 2019.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-16

Most read articles by the same author(s)