Kefi I Kefi, Maria A Maria, Majid Z Majid, Sana J Sana, Afreen M Afreen, Fareed M Fareed, Feroze A Feroze, Sajid H Sajid, Adel S Adel, Iftikhar A Iftikhar, Yawer A Yawer, Kaleem M Kaleem


Background: Silver dental amalgam is one of the oldest filling materials used in dentistry. The
American Dental Association (ADA) has estimated that billions of amalgam restorations have been
placed in patients in the last 150 years. Due to the presence of mercury and mishandling during the
filling make it more controversial. The objective of this study was to conduct a survey of the use of
different brands and to assess any deviations in practice from the hand mixing manual method of
elemental mercury and alloy in a pestle/mortar and encapsulated form. Methods: A questionnaire was
sent to 250 of randomly selected dental practitioner in various localities of Karachi. Data was analysed to
record the specified brands used along with their powder/liquid (P/L) ratio and the different methods for
disposing off mercury in this study. Results: The most commonly used form of dispensing method was
hand mixing (57%) and only 30% of the dentists followed the manufacturer instruction for hand mixing
ratio. Eighty-seven percent of dental amalgam restoration was performed and 13% removed by the
dentist per month and the method of disposing the amalgam wastage that 55%, 25%, and 20% dentists
were used the sink, bin and other methods respectively in their dental clinics. Conclusion: Amalgam
restoration is still popular filling material in the posterior region of the mouth but we need to create
awareness among the dentists who do not follow the ADA specifications.
Keywords: Dental amalgam, alloy mercury ratio, amalgam wastage, amalgam dispensing

Full Text:



Xibio Y, Haojun Q, Peicheng X, Lin Z, Matthew PL, Hua F.

Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and mercury exposure among

children with and without dental amalgam filling. Int J Hyg

Environ Health 2009;212:378–6.

Lorscheider FL, Vimy MJ, Summer AO. Mercury exposure from

silver tooth fillings: emerging evidence questions a tradional

dental paradigm. FASEB J 1995;9:504–8.

Riethe P. The historical development of amalgams. Dtsch

Zahnarztl Z 1980;35:443–9.

Hyson JM, Jr. Amalgam: Its history and Perils. J Calif Dent Assoc


Sortur SH (Editor). Essential of dental material 1st ed. New Delhi:

Jaypee Brother Medical Publisher Pt (Ltd); 2002.p. 202.

Richard AD, Shaghayegh A, Wei-Hua M, Kun T, Fariborz F,

Brian WD, Gregory AC. Geometric, electronic and elastic

properties of dental silver amalgam g-(Ag3Sn),g1-(Ag2Hg3), g2-

(Sn8Hg) phases, comparison of experiment and theory.

Intermetallics 2010;18:756–60.

Sonja MM. The children’s amalgam trial study group. The Children’s

amalgam trial: design and methods. The children’s amalgam trial

study group. Controlled Clinical Trial 2003;24:795–814.

Mc Cabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials 9th ed. U.K:

Blackwell; 2008.p. 181–3, 192.

Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials.

th ed., 11830, St Louis, Missouri: Mosby; 2006. p. 248.

Swedish Council for Planning and Coordinating Research (FRN)

Stockholm. Report No. 2652, 19 February 1998. Helsetilsynet

[Norwegian Board of Health Supervision] Available at: (accessed 26 August 2009).

Lundberg S. Swedish views on questions put at the stakeholder

meeting concerning the mercury export ban and storage

obligations of mercury 8th September 2005. Brussels, European

Commission, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Division for

Eco-management and Chemicals, 2005.

Anderson BA. Dental amalgam: a report with reference to the

medical devices directive 93/42/EEC from an Ad Hoc Working

Group mandated by DGIII of the European Commission.

Angelholm, Sweden: Nordiska Dental AB; 1998.

Dental mercury use banned in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

Reuters, January 3, 2008. Available at:


Best management practices for amalgam waste. American Dental

Association [online article]. Available at:

prof/resources/topics/amalgam_bmp.asp. (accessed 26 Aug 2009).

Hörsted-Bindslev P. Amalgam toxicity-environmental and

occupational hazards. J Dent 2004;32:359–65.

Best Management Practices for Amalgam Waste. 211East

Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2678 American Dental

Association. October 2007. Available at:


Dowling AH, Fleming GJ. Is encapsulation of posterior glassionomer restoratives the solution to clinically induced variability

introduced on mixing? Dent Mater 2008;24:957–66.

Mumtaz R, Ali Khan, Noor N, Humayan S. Amalgam use and

waste management by Pakistani dentists: an environmental

perspective. East Mediterr Health J 2010;16:334–9.

American Dental Association. When your patients ask about

mercury in amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:395–8.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] []