Faris QB Alenzi, Mahmoud Lotfy, Wasam Nasif, Mohamed El- Shahat, Hasan Abusini, Mohamed Alenazi, Fawwaz A Alenazi, Waleed G Tamimi, Mohamed L Salem


Background: There is a dire need in the Arab world and Middle Eastern countries to reform the
higher education, research policy and planning for improving the quality to meet the needs of
modern society. The impact factor (IF) was developed in the 1960s by Eugene Garfield of the
Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) in the USA. It has been extensively used for more than 40
years. The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator belongs to this new family of indicators based
on eigenvector centrality was introduced since 2007. The SJR indicator is a size-independent
metric aimed at measuring the current ‘average prestige per paper’ of journals for use in research
evaluation processes. Methods: We present the status of the biomedical scientific research in the
Middle Eastern countries through the newly developed SJR indicator showing some of the
proposed ways that clearly can be applied for enhancing and development of that field in the
Middle Eastern countries. Results: During the period from 1996 to 2008, Northern America,
Western Europe and Asiatic region are the major contributors of the scientific research
Worldwide. In the Middle East, the prominent two main Arab countries are Egypt and Saudi
Arabia, nevertheless, they need more planned strategies for optimal contribution to their Middle
East, Arab region and the World, despite the tangible achievements of the Arab states in the higher
education and scientific research during the last decade. Conclusion: The SJR is seemingly
satisfactory for ranking the countries for their scientific contribution and impact.
Keywords: Biomedical Research, Middle East, SJR

Full Text:



Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

JAMA 2006;295:90–3.

Garfield E. How can impact factors be improved? BMJ


Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.

Science 1972;178:471–9.

Schöpfela J, Prostb H. Le JCR facteur d’impact (IF) et le

SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR) des revues françaises:

une étude (comparative comparison of SCImago Journal Rank

Indicator (SJR) with JCR journal impact factor (IF) for French

journals). Psychologie Française 2009;54(4):287–305.

Flisher AJ. Does the impact factor have too much impact? S Afr

Med J 2009;99(4):226–8.

Kurmis AP. Understanding the limitations of the journal impact

factor. J Bone Joint Surg 2003;85-A:2449–54.

Whitehouse GH. Impact factors: facts and myths. Eur Radiol


Lankhorst GJ, Franchignoni F. The ‘impact factor’ –an

explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals. Clin

Rehabil 2001;15:115–8.

Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used

for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:498–502.

Campbell P. Escape from the impact factor. Ethics Sci Environ

Polit 2008;8:5.

Hobbs R. Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ 2007;334:569.

Falagas, ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R,

Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of SCImago journal rank

indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J 2008;22:2623–8.

SCImago Research Group. Description of SCImago Journal

Rank Indicator. Retrieved April 16, 2010, from and the

SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals’ scientific prestige.

Retrieved from


bin Tareef A. Scientific research in Jordanian higher education

institutions: an evaluation of the status and obstacles. J

Instructional Psychol June 2009.

Badr AZ, EI-Nazer H, EI-Tayeb M. Practical solutions of

scientific research problems in Egypt. J Egypt Wom Dermatol

Soc 2009;6:1–2.

A decade of higher education in the Arab States: achievements &

challenges. Regional report for UNESCO regional bureau for

education in the Arab States, Beirut, Lebanon, June 29, 2009. pp



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] []