COMPARISON OF DISTANCE BETWEEN MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORS AND INCISIVE PAILLA IN DENTATE INDIVIDUALS WITH DIFFERENT ARCH FORMS

Majid Zia, Azad Ali Azad, Salman Ahmed

Abstract


Background: After loss of natural teeth, provision of prosthodontic services almost becomes necessity in the
present day living. To provide effective mastication teeth have peculiar forms. To make it more efficient both
functionally and biologically, they are arranged in particular geometric manner referred to as dental arch. The
objective of this study was to compare the distance between mesial edge of the maxillary central incisors and
posterior border of the incisive papilla in dentate individuals with different arch forms. Methods: After
sample selection, impressions were made for upper and lower arches and the resultant casts were standardised.
Arch forms were assessed by their morphological description. Measurements on cast were recorded for
incisive papilla (IP) and maxillary central incisor (CI) distance after securing it on cast surveyor. Results:
Ovoid arch form was the most frequently observed arch form both in males (57%) and females (68%) while
their combination (Ovoid Square and Ovoid tapered) were the least commonly observed arch forms (4% and
5% each). Gender seems to be important in about 1/4th of the dentate individuals, regarding both the type of
the arches and CI-IP distance. Conclusion: Ovoid type of arches was the commonest arch form seen in either
sex. There is no significant difference between males and females in ¾th of dentate individuals, regarding the
type of dental arch as well as CI-IP distance.
Keywords: Incisive papilla, arch forms, anatomic landmarks

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bolender CL. The try in appointment. In: Zarb GA. Bolender

CL. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: complete

dentures and implant supported prostheses. 12th ed. India:

Elsevier Publishers; 2004. p.329–78.

Pound E. Applying harmony in selecting and arranging teeth.

Dent Clin North Am 1962;241–58.

Nelson AA. The esthetic triangle in the arrangement of teeth.

Nat Dent Assoc 1922;9:392–401.

Heartwell CM, Rahn AO. Syllabus of complete dentures. 4th ed.

Bombay: Varghese Publisfing House;1992.

Nagda SJ. Good laboratory practice in prosthodontics. J Indian

Prosthodont Soc 2006;6:3.

Roraff AR. Arranging artificial teeth according to anatomic

landmarks. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:120–30.

Watt DM, Durran CM, Adenubi JO. Biometric guides to the

design of complete maxillary dentures. Dent Mag Oral Top

;84:109–11.

Sharry JJ, editor. Complete Denture Prosthodontics.2nd ed.

New york: Mcgraw-Hill Book;1968.

Demirel F, Oktemer M. The relations between alveolar ridge

and the teeth located in neutral zone. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac

;2:562–6.

Schiffman P. Relation of the maxillary canines to the incisive

papilla. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:469–72.

Ehrlich J, Gazit E. Relationship of the maxillary central

incisors and canines to the incisive papilla. J Oral Rehabil

;2:309–12.

Huang SJ, Chou TM, Lee HE, Wu YC, Yang YH, Ho CD, et al.

Exploring the distance between upper central incisor edge and

incisive papilla in Taiwanese population. Taiwan J Oral Med

Health Sci 2004;20:4–10.

Ortman HR, Tsao DH. Relationship of the incisive papilla to

the maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42: 492–6.

Mersel A, Ehrlich J. Connection between incisive papilla,

central incisor and rugae canina. Quintessence Int

;12:1327–9.

Ryge G, Fairhurst CW. The contour meter. J Prosthet Dent

;9:676–82.

Choudhary SC, Terry JM, Gehl DH, Ryge G. Dimensional

stability and fluid sorption in porcelain base dentures. J

Prosthet Dent 1964;14:442–55.

Grove HF, Christensen LV. Relationship of first primary

palatine rugae to the maxillary canines in man. J Oral Rehabil

;15:133–9.

McGee GF. Tooth placement and contour in denture

construction. J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:651–7.

Nagle RJ, Sears VH. Denture Prosthetics: Complete

Dentures.2nd ed. St.Louis: The CV Mosby; 1962.

Lau GC, Clark RF. The relationship of the incisive papilla to

the maxillary central incisors and canine teeth in southern

Chinese. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:86–93.

Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. Nasal width and incisive papilla

as guides for the selection and arrangement of maxillary

anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:592–7.

Grave AM, Becker PJ. Evaluation of the incisive papilla as a

guide to anterior tooth position. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:712–4.

Kharat DU, Madan RS. An investigation into the distance

between incisive papilla and incisal edge of maxillary central

incisor. J Indian Dent Assoc 1984;56:425–8.

Hock DA. Qualitative and quantitative guides to the selection

and arrangement of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthod

;1:106–111.

Kook YA. Nojima K. Moon HB. McLaughlin RP. Sinclair PM.

Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North

American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

;126:680–6.

Nakatsuka M, Iwai Y, Jue SS, Oh SH, Guo L, Tominaga Y, et

al. A morphological study on the classification of maxillary

dental arches. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2004;81:5–13.

Grove HF, Christensen LV. Relationship of the maxillary

canines to the incisive papilla. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:51–3.

Kawahata N, Ono H, Kamashita Y, Hamano T, Nagaoka E.

Application of a three-dimensional reconstruction method to

analysis of the residual ridge. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:936–41.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] [ayubmed.edu.pk]