Nazeer Khan, Yasmin Mumtaz


Background: Statistics is mainly used in biological research to verify the clinicians and researchers
findings and feelings, and gives scientific validity for their inferences. In Pakistan, the educational
curriculum is developed in such a way that the students who are interested in entering in the field of
biological sciences do not study mathematics after grade 10. Therefore, due to their fragile background
of mathematical skills, the Pakistani medical professionals feel that they do not have adequate base to
understand the basic concepts of statistical techniques when they try to use it in their research or read a
scientific article. The aim of the study was to assess the attitude of medical faculty towards statistics.
Methods: A questionnaire containing 42 close-ended and 4 open-ended questions, related to the
attitude and knowledge of statistics, was distributed among the teaching faculty of Dow University of
Health Sciences (DUHS). One hundred and sixty-seven filled questionnaires were returned from 374
faculty members (response rate 44.7%). Results: Forty-three percent of the respondents claimed that
they had ‘introductive’ level of statistics courses, 63% of the respondents strongly agreed that a good
researcher must have some training in statistics, 82% of the faculty was in favour (strongly agreed or
agreed) that statistics was really useful for research. Only 17% correctly stated that statistics is the
science of uncertainty. Half of the respondents accepted that they have problem of writing the statistical
section of the article. 64% of the subjects indicated that statistical teaching methods were the main
reasons for the impression of its difficulties. 53% of the faculty indicated that the co-authorship of the
statistician should depend upon his/her contribution in the study. Gender did not show any significant
difference among the responses. However, senior faculty showed higher level of the importance for the
use of statistics and difficulties of writing result section of articles as compared to junior faculty.
Conclusion: The study showed a low level of knowledge, but high level of the awareness for the use of
statistical techniques in research and exhibited a good level of motivation for further training.
Keywords: Attitude, statistics, knowledge of medical faculty, knowledge about SPSS.


Reznick RK, Dawso-Saunders E, Folse JR. A rational for the

teaching of statistics to surgical residents. Surgery 1987;101:611–

Wulff HR, Anderson B, Brandenhoff P, Gittler F. When do

doctors know about statistics? Stat Med 1987;6:3–10.

Altman DG, Bland JM, Improving doctors’ understanding of

statistics J R Stat Soc [A] 1991;154 (pt 2):223–67.

O’Donnel CA. Attitudes and knowledge of primary care

professionals towards evidence-based practice, a postal survey. J

Eval Clin Pract 2004;10(2):197-205..

West CP, Ficalora RD. Clinician attitudes towards Biostatistics.

Maya Clin Prac 2007;82:939–43.

Horton NJ, Switzer SS. Statistical methods in the journal. N Engl

J Med 2005;353:1977–9.

Altman DG. Statistical reviewing for medical journals. Stat Med


Morris RW. Does EBM offer the best opportunity yet for

teaching medical statistics? Stat Med 2002;21:969–77.

Shah SI. Viewpoint: pancakes and medical statistics. Acad Med


Scheutz F, Andersen B, Wulff HR. What do dentists know about

statistics? Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:281–7.

Windish DM, Huot SJ, Green MI. Medicine residents’

understanding of the Biostatistics and results in the medical

literature. JAMA 2007; 298(9):1010-22.

Altman DG, Goodman SN, Schroter S. How statistical expertise

is used in medical research? JAMA 2002;287:2817–20.

Godwin M, Seguin R. Critical appraisal of family physicians in

Ontario, Canada. BMC Med Educ 2003;3:10.

Adily A, Westbrook J, Colera E, Ward J. Use of on-line evidence

databases by Australian public health practitioners. Med Inform

Internet Med 2004;29:127–36.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] []