COMPARISON OF THE ADAPTABILITY OF TWO FISSURE SEALANTS IN VARIOUS TOOTH FISSURE MORPHOLOGY PATTERNS: AN IN VITRO EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Tabinda Nawaz Khan, Farhan Raza Khan, Sadia Rizwan, Khush Bakht Nawaz Khan, Syeda Noureen Iqbal, Yawar Ali Abidi

Abstract


Background: This study was conducted to compare the adaptation of resin-based sealants with that of Resin modified glass ionome-based sealants in various tooth fissure morphologies. Methods: It was an in vitro experimental study done at the Dow University and NED University, Karachi, Pakistan. Ten extracted human molars were randomly assigned to two groups, (n=5) each. Fissure sealant material (Resin based sealant or resin modified glass ionomer-based sealant) was applied on the occlusal surface of the tooth according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Specimens were thermocycled and then sectioned into three longitudinal parts in the bucco–lingual direction. Specimens were examined using scanning electron microscope for the adaptation of the sealant in the occlusal fissure. Mann-Whitney –U test and Kruskall-Wallis test were applied to compare the adaptability scores of sealant materials in the tooth fissure. Level of significance was kept at 0.05.Results: There were no significant differences in the adaptability scores among U-shaped (p-value=0.35), V-shaped (p-value=0.89), IK-shaped (p-value=0.52), I-shaped (p-value-=0.41) and Y-shaped (p-value=1.00) fissure patterns. Similarly, there were no significant differences observed between the resin-based sealant (p-value=0.95) versus RMGIC based sealant (p-value=0.63) for the adaptability scores in various tooth fissure morphologies. Conclusions: No significant difference was found between resin-based sealants and resin modified glass ionomer-based sealants for the adaptation in various tooth fissure patterns.

Keywords: Fissure morphology; fissure sealants; RMGIC; flowable resin; scanning electron microscopy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nirwan M, Nigam AG, Marwah N, Nayak UA, Bansal A, Gahlot MS. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017;35(4):359–66.

Iyer RR, GopaPalakrishnapillai AC, Kalantharakath T. Comparisons of in vitro penetration and adaptation of moisture tolerant resin sealant and conventional resin sealant in different fissure types. Chin J Dent Res 2013;16(2):127–36.

Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Schmidl R, Schüller C, Frank W, Werth VD. Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int J Oral Sci 2017;9(2):117–24.

Tamasas BI. The effects of different concentrations of ethyl alcohol as drying agent on pit and fissure sealant treatment. Tufts Univ School Dent Med 2013.

Twetman S. The evidence base for professional and self-care prevention-caries, erosion and sensitivity. BMC Oral Health 2015;15(Suppl 1):S1–8.

Moreira KMS, Kantovitz KR, Aguiar JPD, Borges AFS, Pascon FM, Puppin-Rontani RM. Impact of the intermediary layer on sealant retention: a randomized 24-month clinical trial. Clin Oral Investiq 2017;21(5):1435–43.

Khanal S, Suprabha BS, Srikant N. Evaluation of microleakage and adaptability of glass ionomer and resin sealants with invasive and non invasive technique. J Nepal Dent Assoc 2010;11(1):4–10.

Beiruti N, Frencken J, van't Hof M, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006;34(6):403–9.

Khan TN, Ali Abidi SY, Nawaz Khan KB, Ahmed S, Rehman Qazi FU, Saeed N. Micromechanical Intervention in Sandwich Restoration. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015;25(11):781–4.

Wolf M, Küpper K, Reimann S, Bourauel C, Frentzen M. 3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique. Clin Oral Investiq 2014;18(1):155–61.

Ahuja L, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Walia R, et al. A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of new MTA based sealers with conventional resin based sealer: An in-vitro study. J Clin Diag Res 2016;10(7):ZC76–9.

Al-Jobair A, Al-Hammad N, Alsadhan S, Salama F. Retention and caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based sealants: An 18-month-randomized clinical trial. Dent Mater J 2017;36(5):654–61.

Nandana KL, Sankar AS, Kumar MM, Naveen K, Pranitha K, Manjula BS. Comparative evaluation of microleakage using three variables of glass-ionomer cement in primary and permanent teeth: An in vitro study. J Interdisc Dent 2016;6(3):110–5.

Al-Jobair A. Scanning electron microscope analysis of sealant penetration and adaptation in contaminated fissures. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013;31(3):169–74.

Luong E, Shayegan A. Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018;10:83–92.

Garg N, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sardana D. Comparative evaluation of penetration ability of three pit and fissure sealants and their relationship with fissure patterns. J Dent (Shiraz) 2018;19(2):92–9.

Zakaria MA, Hossain M, Moral MAA. Comparative efficacy of nanofilled and microfilled resin-modified glass ionomer as pits and fissure sealant in permanent molar teeth. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med Univ J 2017;10(2):53–7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] [ayubmed.edu.pk]