ULTRASOUND GUIDED TUNNELLED CUFFED CATHETER PLACEMENT WITHOUT FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE BY ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; ACCURACY AND SAFETY

Wahaj Wahaj, Malik Nadeem Azam, Batool Butt, Salahuddin Salahuddin, Taleah Tahir, Nudrat Jehangir Khan, Muhammad Khalid Rahman, Khalid Mehmood Raja, Abdul Rehman Arshad, Abdul Wahab Mir

Abstract


Background: Chronic kidney disease is a growing disease with high morbidity and mortality. Haemodialysis remains the most common option available for all those not planning for renal transplantation. Vascular access is the most important aspect of haemodialysis. Though not recommended but central venous catheters remain the most common vascular access in starters on haemodialysis. There is a growing trend towards placement of tunnelled cuffed catheters (TCC). TCC placement requires fluoroscopic guidance which is not available in all centres. The rationale of this study was to describe safety and accuracy of a catheter placement technique not dependent on fluoroscopic guidance for resource limited settings. Methods: Dialysis dependent patients of a single hospital without long term vascular access were selected over a period of 15 months after getting informed written consent. A new technique was described in which depth of catheter was estimated by superficial anatomical and ultrasound guided measurements for TCC placement which were checked by conventional chest radiography post procedure. Results: A total of 209 catheters were placed over a period of 15 months, 189 males and 30 females. Various sites were used predominantly right Internal jugular vein (IJV) (85.6%). Overall success rate was 97.1% (98.3% males, 90% females, p=0.08). Right IJV was successful 98.9%, left IJV 87.5% (p<0.001). Multiple thrombosed/stenosed veins were associated with higher failure rate (p<0.001). Conclusion: TCC can be placed successfully and safely in right IJV under ultrasound guidance using anatomical landmark measurement technique without fluoroscopic guidance.

Keywords: Chronic Kidney Disease; Haemodialysis; Central Venous Catheter; Tunnelled Cuffed Catheter; Anatomical Landmarks; Carina; Fluoroscopy; Chest Radiograph

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 2013;382(9888):260–72.

Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, Neal B, Patrice HM, Okpechi I, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet 2015;385(9981):1975–82.

Vascular Access 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48(Suppl 1):S176–247.

Foley RN, Chen SC, Collins AJ. Hemodialysis access at initiation in the United States, 2005 to 2007: Still “catheter first”. Hemodial Int 2009;13(4):533–42.

Nasir Mahmood S, Naveed Mukhtar K, Iqbal N, Umair SF. Pre Dialysis care and types of Vascular Access Employed in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A study from Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29(3):828–31.

Register COR. Annual report: Treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada, 2003 to 2012. Don Mills, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2014.

Noordzij M, Jager JK, van der Ver SN, Kramar R, Collart F, Heaf JG, et al. Use of vascular access for haemodialysis in Europe: a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29(10):1956–64.

Cohen AB, Dagli M, Stavropoulos SW Jr, Mondschein JI, Soulen MC, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Silicone and polyurethane tunneled infusion catheters: a comparison of durability and breakage rates. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22(5):638–41.

Force FT. Precautions necessary with central venous catheters. FDA Drug Bull 1989;19:5.

Oncology Nursing Society. Access Device Guidelines: Recommendations for Nursing Practice and Education. Oncology Nursing Press; 1996.

National Association of Vascular Access Networks. NAVAN Position Statement. J Vasc Access Devices 1998;3:8–10.

Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle M, McGoldrick M, Orr M, Doellman D. The 2016 Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs 2016;39(1 Suppl.):S1–159.

Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central Vein Catheterization: Failure and Complication Rates by Three Percutaneous Approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146(2):259–61.

Stonelake PA, Bodenham AR. The carina as a radiological landmark for central venous catheter tip position. Br J Anaesth 2006;96(3):335–40.

Albrecht K, Nave H, Breitmeier D, Panning B, Tröger HD. Applied anatomy of the superior vena cava-the carina as a landmark to guide central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 2004;92(1):75–7.

Chen PT, Ting CK, Wang YC, Cheng HW, Chan KH, Chang WK. Practical preprocedure measurement to estimate the required insertion depth and select the optimal size of tunneled dialysis catheter in uremic patients. Semin Dial 2010;23(4):431–9.

Calabria M, Zamboli P, D'Amelio A, Granata A, Di Lullo L, Floccari F, et al. Renal Ultrasound Study Group of the Italian Nephrology Society (SIN-GSER). G Ital Nefrol 2012;29(1):49–57.

Salimi F, Imani MR, Ghasemi N, Keshavarzian A, Jazi AH. The mid-sternal length, a practical anatomical landmark for optimal positioning of long-term central venous catheters. J Res Med Sci 2013;18(5):383–6.

Kjelstrup T, Ludwig M, Hüsch M. Positioning of central venous catheters using ECG. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1991;111(5):599–601.

Ender J, Erdoes G, Krohmer E, Olthoff D, Mukherjee C. Transesophageal echocardiography for verification of the position of the electrocardiographically-placed central venous catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23(4):457–61.

Na HS, Kim JT, Kim HS, Bahk JH, Kim CS, Kim SD. Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2009;102(6):820–3.

Ezri T, Weisenberg M, Sessler DI, Berkenstadt H, Elias S, Szmuk P, et al. Correct Depth of Insertion of Right Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheters Based on External Landmarks: Avoiding the Right Atrium. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007;21(4):497–501.

Kim KO, Jo JO, Kim HS, Kim CS. Positioning internal jugular venous catheters using the right third intercostal space in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47(10):1284–6.

Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med 2015;373(13):1220–9.

Engstrom BI, Horvath JJ, Stewart JK, Sydnor RH, Miller MJ, Smith TP, et al. Tunneled internal jugular hemodialysis catheters: impact of laterality and tip position on catheter dysfunction and infection rates. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24(9):1295–302.

Smith RN, Nolan JP. Central venous catheters. BMJ 2013;347:f6570.

Bodenham A, Babu S, Bennett J, Binks R, Fee P, Fox B, et al. Association of anaesthetists of great Britain and Ireland: Safer vascular access guidelines 2016. Anaesthesia 2016;71(5):573–85.

Aslamy Z, Dewald CL, Heffner JE. MRI of central venous anatomy: implications for central venous catheter insertion. Chest 1998;114(3):820–6.

Rutherford JS, Merry AF, Occleshaw CJ. Depth of central venous catheterization: an audit of practice in a cardiac surgical unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994;22(3):267–71.

Schuster M, Nave H, Piepenbrock S, Pabst R, Panning B. The carina as a landmark in central venous catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 2000;85(2):192–4.

Kwon HJ, Jeong YI, Jun IG, Moon YJ, Lee YM. Evaluation of a central venous catheter tip placement for superior vena cava-subclavian central venous catheterization using a premeasured length: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(2):e9600.

Lee JB, Lee YM. Pre-measured length using landmarks on posteroanterior chest radiographs for placement of the tip of a central venous catheter in the superior vena cava. J Int Med Res 2010;38(1):134–41.

Maceira AM, Cosín-Sales J, Roughton M, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ. Reference right atrial dimensions and volume estimation by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:29.

Li W, Wan K, Han Y, Liu H, Cheng W, Sun J, et al. Reference value of left and right atrial size and phasic function by SSFP CMR at 3.0 T in healthy Chinese adults. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):3196.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Contact Number: +92-992-382571

email: [jamc] [@] [ayubmed.edu.pk]