REDUCING IATROGENIC ERRORS IN ENDODONTICS: USING THE BRITISH ENDODONTIC CASE ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-01-14221Keywords:
Endodontics, Perforation, Ledge formation Missed canal, British Endodontic Case Assessment Toolkit, Patients, Cross-sectional Analysis, Patient care, Dentists with Enhanced Skills PractitionerAbstract
Background: Endodontics is supposed to be specific and require high dexterity, errors occur which include perforation, ledge formation or missed canals, which in turn influence the treatment outcome and patients’ confidence. In hospitals, where multitudes of dentists, regardless of their experience, work in, proper case type and skill set alignment is influential. The British Endodontic Case Assessment Toolkit (BES) is used for evaluating the difficulty of cases, provides a system that will assist in categorizing cases based on the competent professional. This research aims at identifying the potential of using BES Toolkit to minimize the rate of errors, enhance care. Methods: This study was conducted as a cross-sectional analysis aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the British Endodontic Case Assessment Toolkit (BES Toolkit) in minimizing iatrogenic errors in endodontics. The study was carried out at Khyber College of Dentistry over six months, assessing 100 root canal treatment cases that had documented errors. Each case was scored using the BES Toolkit to determine difficulty levels: 17 Low (1 – 12) Medium (13 – 16) High (17 – 24) and High+ (>25) Ø Collected data included patient data, completion difficulty scores, practitioner type, and error characteristics. Outpatients, patients referred to the hospital from other hospitals, patients under 18 years of age and pregnant patients who refused X-ray examination in the hospital were excluded. Results: A breakdown of the results also showed that 40% of errors made were in average cases and another 40% were in the high-risk ones. Majority of errors were committed whenever GDPs practiced in areas which they were not properly conversant with especially when the score exceeded 16. For example, stronger team communication was observed when complex cases were attended by senior staff like Dentists with Enhanced Skills (DwESEs) or senior and more experienced members of the team. Conclusions: The BES Toolkit also assists in proper docketing of the case in the right practitioner depending on the level of difficulty in a way that reverses any mistakes and increases the patient’s quality of life. When this tool is integrated into practice as a common practice in hospitals then delivery of safe and effective patient care will be enhanced.
References
1. Singh A, Jala S, Agarwal P, Sharma A, Abraham D, Pratima M. Successful endodontic management of three rooted mandibular 1st molars: Radix Entomolaris-A Case Series. Int J Dent Sci Innov Res 2019;2(1):167–75.
2. Alamoudi RA, Alharbi AH, Farie GA, Fahim O. The value of assessing case difficulty and its effect on endodontic iatrogenic errors: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Libyan J Med 2020;15(1):1688916.
3. Chaniotis A, Sousa Dias H, Chanioti A. Negotiation of Calcified Canals. 2024;13(9): J Clin Med 2024;13(9):2703.
4. Eachempati P, Lambourn G, Harris A, Mccoll E. Top tips for treatment planning: tooth-by-tooth prognosis-Part 1: restorative prognosis. Br Dent J 2024;236:736–41.
5. Shah PK, Chong BS. A web-based endodontic case difficulty assessment tool. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(6):2381–8.
6. Shah PK, Zhang Q, Chong BS. Get Smart – technological innovations in endodontics part 2: case-difficulty assessment and future perspectives. Dent Update 2021;48(7):556–62.
7. Essam O, Boyle EL, Whitworth JM, Jarad FD. The Endodontic Complexity Assessment Tool (E-CAT): A digital form for assessing root canal treatment case difficulty. Int Endod J 2021;54(7):1189–99.
8. Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Factors that affect the outcomes of root canal treatment and retreatment—A reframing of the principles. Int Endod J 2023;56(Suppl 2):82–115.
9. Haji-Hassani N, Bakhshi M, Shahabi S. Original Research Conflicts of Interest: None Source of Support: Nil Frequency of Iatrogenic Errors through Root Canal Treatment Procedure in 1335 Charts of Dental Patients. 2015;7(Suppl 1)14–7.
10. Lazarski MP, Walker WA, Flores CM, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM. Epidemiological Evaluation of the Outcomes of Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment in a Large Cohort of Insured Dental Patients. J Endod 2001;27(12):791–6.
11. Liang YH, Li G, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The association between complete absence of post-treatment periapical lesion and quality of root canal filling. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(6):1619–26.
12. Yousuf W, Khan M, Mehdi H. Endodontic procedural errors: Frequency, type of error, and the most frequently treated tooth. Int J Dent 2015;2015:673914.
13. Mousa MA, Alshammari AM, Alshammari AZ, Alsharari MM, Baig MN, Srivastava KC, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Adequacy of Root Canal Treatment Performed by Interns and Undergraduate Dental Students—A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study. Appl Sci 2022;12(18):9079.
14. Marquis VL, Dao T, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: The Toronto Study. Phase III: Initial treatment. J Endod 2006;32(4):299–306.
15. Meckfessel S, Stühmer C, Bormann KH, Kupka T, Behrends M, Matthies H, et al. Introduction of e-learning in dental radiology reveals significantly improved results in final examination. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39(1):40–8.
16. Niazi SA, Bakhsh A. Association between Endodontic Infection, Its Treatment and Systemic Health: A Narrative Review. Medicina (Lithuania) 2022;58(7):931.
17. Almohaimede AA, AlShehri BM, Alaiban AA, AlDakhil RA. Significance of Endodontic Case Difficulty Assessment: A Retrospective Study. Int Dent J 2022;72(5):648–53.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fawad Ali Shah, Sumbal Khan, Shafqat Ali Shah, Laila Gul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
