ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF RENAL SIZE AND ITS CORRELATION WITH BODY MASS INDEX IN ADULTS WITHOUT KNOWN RENAL DISEASE
Abstract
Background: Many conditions affect renal size. To evaluate abnormalities in renal size, knowledge ofstandardised values for normal renal dimensions is essential as it shows variability in the values of
normal renal size depending on body size, age and ethnicity. Ultrasound, being an easily available, noninvasive, safe and less expensive modality, is widely used for evaluation of renal dimensions and
repeated follow-ups. The objectives of this study were to determine renal size by ultrasound in adults
without any known renal disease, and to determine the relationship of renal size with body mass index.
Methods: Study was conducted in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shifa International
Hospital and PIMS Islamabad. Renal size was assessed by ultrasound in 4,035 adult subjects with
normal serum creatinine and without any known renal disease, between November 2002 and December
2010. Renal length, width, thickness and volume were obtained and mean renal length and volume
were correlated with body mass index and other factors like age, side, gender, weight and height of the
subjects. Results: Mean renal length on right side was 101.6±8.9 mm, renal width 42.7±7.1 mm, and
parenchymal thickness 14.4±2.9 mm. On left side, mean renal length was 102.7±9.2 mm, width
47.6±7.0 mm, and parenchymal thickness 15.1±3.1 mm. Mean renal volume on right was 99.8±37.2
cm3 and on left was 124.4±41.3 cm3. Left renal size was significantly larger than right in both genders.
Relationship of mean renal length was significant when correlated with age, side, gender, height and
weight, and body mass index. Renal volumes also showed a similar relationship with side, gender,
height and weight, and body mass index; but with age such a relationship was seen only for left kidney.
Conclusion: Pakistani population has mean renal size smaller than reference values available in
international literature. Renal length and volume have a direct relationship with body mass index. Mean
renal size is related to the side, age, gender, height and weight as well.
Keywords: Body mass index, Renal size, Ultrasound
References
Bax L, Van der Graaf Y, Rabelink AJ, Algra A, Beutler JJ, Mali
WP; SMART Study Group. Influence of atherosclerosis on agerelated changes in renal size and function. Eur J Clin Invest
;33(1):34-40.
Weisenbach J, Horvath M, Jeges S, Adamovich K, Huszar T.
Normal percentiles of kidney size in children as measured by
ultrasonography. Orv Hetil 2001;142:71-4.
Segal MC, Lecky JW, Slasky BS. Diabetes mellitus: The
predominant cause of bilateral renal enlargement. Radiology
;153:341-2.
Kang KY, Lee YJ, Park SC, Yang CW, Kim YS, Moon IS, et al.
A comparative study of methods of estimating kidney length in
kidney transplantation donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant
;22:2322-7.
Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Ytte L. Sonographic
evaluation of renal appearance in 665 adult volunteers.
Correlation with age and obesity. Acta Radiol 1993;34:482-5.
Radermacher J. Ultrasonography of the kidney and renal vessels.
I. Normal findings, inherited and parenchymal diseases. Urologe
A 2005;44:1351-63. (Article in German)
Rafique M. Value of routine renal and abdominal
ultrasonography in patients undergoing prostatectomy. Int Urol
Nephrol 2006;38:153-6.
Mehmood T. Experience of intraoperative ultrasound compared to
CT, MR and percutaneous ultrasound. J Surg Pak 2003;8:35-8.
Widjaja E, Oxtoby JW, Hale TL, Jones PW, Harden PN, McCall
IW. Ultrasound measured renal length versus low dose CT
volume in predicting single kidney glomerular filtration rate. Br J
Radiol 2004;77:759-64.
Bakker J, Olree M, Kaatee R, Lange de EE, Beek FJ. In vitro
measurement of kidney size: Comparison of ultrasonography and
MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:683-8.
Buchholz NP, Abbas F, Biyabani SR, Afzal M, Javed Q, Rizvi I,
et al. Ultrasonographic renal size in individuals without known
renal disease. J Pak Med Assoc 2000;50:12-6.
Cheong B, Muthupillai R, Rubin MF, Flamm SD. Normal values
for renal length and volume as measured by magnetic resonance
imaging. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2:38-45.
Mazzotta L, Sarteschi LM, Carlini A, Antonelli A. Comparison
of renal ultrasonographic and functional biometry in healthy
patients and in patients with chronic renal failure. Arch Ital Urol
Androl 2002;74:206-9.
Miletić D, Fuckar Z, Sustić A, Mozetic V, Stimac D, Zauhar G.
Sonographic measurement of absolute and relative renal length in
adults. J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26:185-9.
Brandt TD, Neiman HL, Dragowski MJ, Bulawa W, Claykamp
G. Ultrasound assessment of normal renal dimensions. J
Ultrasound Med 1982;1:49-52.
Okoye IJ, Agwu KK, Idigo FU. Normal sonographic renal length
in adult southeast Nigerians. Afr J Med Med Sci 2005;34:129-31.
Barton EN, West WM, Sargeant LA, Lindo JF, Iheonunekwu
NC. A sonographic study of kidney dimensions in a sample of
healthy Jamaicans. West Indian Med J 2000;49:154-7.
Wang F, Cheok SP, Kuan BB. Renal size in healthy Malaysian
adults by ultrasonography. Med J Malaysia 1989;44:45-51.
Fernandes MM, Lemos CC, Lopes GS, Madeira EP, Santos OR,
Dorigo D, et al. Normal renal dimensions in a specific
population. Int Braz J Urol 2002;28:510-5.
Rasmussen SN, Haase L, Kjeldsen H, Hancke S. Determination
of renal volume by ultrasound scanning. J Clin Ultrasound
;6:160-4.
Akpinar IN, Altun E, Avcu S, Tüney D, Ekinci G, Biren T.
Sonographic measurement of kidney size in geriatric patients. J
Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:315-8.
Tajima M. Ultrasonic kidney size measurement. 2. In normal
adolescents. Hinyokika Kiyo 1987;33:1742-8.
Ameer S, Anjum MN, Rehman M, Haider SI, Farooq L, Ijaz MZ.
Sonographic assessment of renal length in normal Pakistani
children. Mother Child 1999;37:45-50.
McLachlan M, Wasserman P. Changes in sizes and distensibility
of the aging kidney. Br J Radiol 1981;54:488-91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
