COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES FOR DENGUE VIRUS INFECTION-A PIOLT STUDY
Abstract
Background: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of commercially available rapid diagnostic testdevices for Dengue serology. To find out the sensitivity and specificity of rapid diagnostic devices
with Elisa results as the Gold standard. Methods: During the dengue virus epidemic in Lahore a
pilot study was conducted in order to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of two most frequently used
immunochromatographic rapid test devices in public sector hospitals. The results of both the kits
were compared to each other. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated against results of ELISA
as the reference gold standard. Results: Results of kit-A revealed a very high false negative rate
when compared to ELISA where actual prevalence rate shown by ELISA was 96.0% compared to
prevalence rate of 44.0% with rapid diagnostic test device kit-A. Similarly the results of rapid test
device Kit-B showed high false negative results for dengue virus prevalence. Actual prevalence
rate of dengue fever shown by ELISA was 96.0% where as it turned out to be 50% with the kit-B
rapid test device. Comparison of Results of two kits revealed no significant difference of test
positivity rates. Conclusion: Rapid test devices based on immunochromatographic method
supplied in the public sector hospitals are not reliable diagnostic tools for screening for dengue
virus infection Health authorities need to review their strategy for supply of more reliable tools
during epidemics in order to avoid false negative results.
Keyword: Immunochromatographic rapid test, Dengue virus, ELISA, Screening tests
References
Branch SL, Levett PN. Evaluation of four methods for
detection of IgM antibodies to Dengue virus. Clin Diag Lab
Immunol 1999;6:555-7.
Groen J, Koraka P, Velzing J, Copra C, Osterhous AD.
Evaluation of six Immunoassays for detection of dengue
virus specific IgM and IgG antibodies. Clin Diag Lab
Immunol 2000;7:867-71
Blacksell SD, Neuton PN, Bell D, Kelly J, Mammen MP Jr,
Vaughn DW, Wathiekanun V, Sungkakum A, Nisalak A,
Day NP. The comparative accuracy of 8 commercial rapid
immunochromatographic assays for the diagnosis of acute
Dengue virus infection. Clin Infec Dis 2006;42:1127-34.
Vaugn DW, Nisalak A, Kalayanarooj S, Solomon T, Dung
NM, Cuzzobo A, Devine PL. Evaluation of a rapid
immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of Dengue virus
infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:234-8.
Sang TC, Hoon LS, Cuzzubbo A, Devine P. Clinical
evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the
diagnosis of Dengue virus infection. Clin Diag Lab
Immunol. 1998;5:407-9.
Kittigul L, Suankeow K. Use of a rapid
Immunochromatographic test for early diagnosis of Dengue
virus infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infec Dis.2002;21:224-6.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.