INDUCING AGENTS FOR BRONCHOSCOPY A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROPANIDID AND THIOPENTONE
Abstract
ABSTRACT:In this study comparison of induction characteristics of Thiopentone and Propanidid in two
groups of patients (25 each) scheduled for bronchoscopy was undertaken. The results show that
Propanidid maintains better cardio-respiratory stability. There is earlier recovery and shorter
anaesthetic period. Propanidid was therefore, found to be safer and more useful inducing agent than
Thiopentone in bronchoscopy, more so in outdoor cases.
References
Spoerel WE, Grant PA. Ventilation during bronchoscopy. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1971; 18:178.
Spoerel WE, Singh NP, Narayanan PS and Rao G. Pulmonary ventilation during bronchoscopy under
general anaesthesia. Ind. J. Anaesth. 1971; 19:123.
Singh NP, Mittal M, Banerjee N, Aggarwal A, Dhawan R, and Lall NG. Comparative elevation of ultrashort acting barbiturate methohexitone and Propanidid. Ind. J. Anaesth. 1968; 16:209.
Chaudhri LS, Narula M, Bhalt MM. Propanidid as sole anaesthetic agent for minor surgical procedures.
Ind. J. Anaesth. 1979; 27:1%.
Gaind S, Khanna SK, Purohit A, Narayanan PS. Anaesthetic management of tracheobronchial foreign
body in children. Ind. J. Anaesthesia. 1978; 26:281.
Dundee JW. Alteration in response to somatic pain associated with anaesthesia. Brit.. J. Anaesth. 1964;
:778.
Dundee JW and Clarke RSJ. Alteration in response to pain with propanediol anaesthesia. Brit. J. Anaesth.
; 37; 121.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.