MEDICAL EXPULSIVE TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL STONE USING TAMSULOSIN
AbstractBackground: Many minimally invasive interventional techniques as well as expectant treatments exist for the management of lower ureteric calculi. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin as an expulsive pharmacologic therapy for the treatment of distal ureteral stone. Methods: This randomized control trial included 100 patients over 18 years of age with stone Size ≤8mm in distal 1/3 of ureter. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (A & B). Group A Patients were given Capsule Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 1 daily up to 4 weeks while group B patients were given placebo, 1 Capsule daily up to 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was expulsion rate. A written informed consent was taken from all the patients. Expulsion time, need for analgesics, need for hospitalization and drug side effects were secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 49 patients in group A and 48 patients in group B reported back, therefore 97 out of 100 patients were evaluated. Mean age of the patients was 36.34 years (range 18–57 years). Mean stone size was 5.78 mm (range 4–8 mm) in greatest dimension. A stone expulsion rate of 85.71% (42 patients) was noted in group A and 54.20% (26 patients) in group B. Group A revealed a statistically significant advantage in term of stone expulsion rate (p=0.032). Considering expulsion time in days group A showed statistically significant advantage (p=0.015). Regarding age, sex, stone size and stone lateralization (right/left), there was no significant difference between the group A and B. No drug side effects were noted in both the groups. Conclusion: By using tamsulosin a higher stone expulsion rates can be achieved in a shorter time. More randomized control trials are required to establish tamsulosin as a standard medical expulsive treatment for small distal ureteric calculus.Keywords: Tamsulosin, expulsive pharmacologic therapy, ureteral stone
Lingeman JE, Matlaga BR, Evan AP. Surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. In: Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters AC, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell- Walsh urology. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2007;1431–1507.
Finlayan B, Ackermann D. Overview of surgical treatment of urolithiasis with special reference to lithotripsy. J Urol 1989;141:778–9.
Eisenberger F, Fuchs G, Miller K, Bub P, Rassweiler J. Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endourology: an ideal combination for the treatnent of kidney stones. World J Urol 1985;3:41–7.
Stoller ML. Urinary stone disease. In: Tanagho EA, McAninch JW. Smith’s general urology. 17th ed. Mc Graw hill, New York 2008;246–77.
De Sio M, Autorino R, Di Lorenzo G, Damiano R, Giordano D, Cosentino L, et al. Medical expulsive treatment of distal ureteral stone using tamsulosin: a single- center experience. J Endourol 2006;20(1):12–5.
Ferre RM, Wasielewski JN, Strout TD, Perron AD. Tamsulosin for ureteral stone in the emergency department: a ramdamized control trial. Ann Emerq Med 2009;54(3):432–9.
Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int 2003;63:1817–23.
Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Management of ureteral calculi: A cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol 2002;167(4):1621–9.
Ueno A, Kawamura T, Ogawa A, Takayasu H. Relation of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to size. Urology 1977;10(6):544–6.
Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. J Urol 1999;162(3):688–90.
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Ghipnone G, Vaccino D, Billia M, Morra I et al. A second cycle of tamsulosin in patients with distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized trial. BJU Int 2009;103(12):1700–3
Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigo G. Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxta vesical ureteral stones. J Urol 2003;170:2202–5.
Kupeli B, Irkilata L, Gurocak S, Tunc L, Kirac M, Karaoglan U, et al. Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearness with or without shock wave lithotripsy? Urology 2004;64(4):1111–5.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.