• Kanwal Saeed
  • Marina Baptist
  • Fatima Mukhtar


Background: Anatomy has always been considered as an essential basis for clinical sciences. In recent decades there has been an increased trend towards incorporation of clinical problems in the teaching of anatomy. To promote clinical knowledge clinico-anatomical conferences have been conducted in our department for the last five years. This study has been undertaken to determine perception of medical students regarding these conferences and to formulate recommendations for their improvement based on feedback obtained from students. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2013 to January 2014 at the Lahore Medical & Dental College (LMDC), Lahore. A sample of 200 students of first and second year MBBS classes was selected for the study through convenience sampling technique. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) was used to determine students’ perception about clinic-anatomical conferences, using a self-administered questionnaire. Data was analysed using SPSS-19.0. Results: Out of total 144 (72%) students were of the opinion that clinico-anatomical conferences were a good source of clinical knowledge, 126 (63%) opined that these conferences promoted understanding rather than memorization, 122 (61%) found them interesting, and 15 (30%) found improvement in their grades in the subject of anatomy after attending the conferences. Conclusion: The clinico-anatomical conferences were found interesting and reported to be a good source of clinical knowledge. It is recommended that these conferences should be conducted frequently, made interactive and patients should be presented as case studies during the conferencesKeywords: Clinico-anatomical conference, teaching methodology, anatomy, students’ perceptions.


Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy:a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 2010;3(2):83–93.

Udaya KP, Madan S. Teaching methodology of Anatomy: a modern outlook. Int J Cur Res Rev 2013;5(4):130–4.

Wader JV, Kumbhar SS, Mankar DV. An appraisal of innovation in practical teaching in anatomic pathology - a students’ and teachers’ perspective. J Med Sci 2014;7(1):58–64.

Patel KM, Moxham BJ. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists. Clin Anat 2008;21(2):182–9.

Sandhu S, Afifi TO, Amara FM. Theories and practical steps for delivering effective lectures. J Community Med Health Educ 2012;2(6):158.

Schmidt HG, Dauphinee WD, Patel VL. Comparing the effects of problem-based and conventional curricula in an international sample.J Med Educ 1987;62(4):305–15.

Ali IS, Khan M, Khan A, Shah MF, Ali G. Trainees' feedback on the prevailing teaching methods in postgraduate medical institute, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22(5):317–9.

Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem based learning medical course? Perception of first year and second year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29(2):173–80.

Jamieson S. Likert Scales: How to (Ab)Use them. Med Educ 2004;38(12):1217–8.

Norman, G . Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics”. Adv Health Sci Educ 2010;15(5):625–32

Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-Based learning: an approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing;1980

Sabbagh MA. Application of case discussions to improve anatomy learning in Syria. Avicenna J Med 2013;3(4):87–91.

Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007;41(1):15–22.

Bergman EM, Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJ. Why don’t they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Med teach 2011;33(5):403–9.

Snelling J, Sahai A, Ellis H. Attitudes of medical and dental students to dissection. Clin Anat 2003; 16(2):165–72.



Most read articles by the same author(s)