TRENDS IN COMPLETE DENTURE IMPRESSIONS IN PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Fahim Vohra
  • Haroon Rashid
  • Ayesha Hanif
  • Siti Mariam Ab Ghani
  • Shariq Najeeb

Abstract

Background: Multiple materials and techniques have been reported for complete denture impressions in literature. The aim of the study was to assess the trends in complete denture impression materials and techniques among general dental practitioners (GDP) and specialists (SP) in Pakistan. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, self-designed-structured questionnaires were distributed among 500 dentists in Pakistan. The three-part questionnaire enquired about the demographic features, preferred impression materials, impression techniques and related procedures commonly used in their clinical practice. A comparison between the responses of SP and GDP was also drawn. Frequency distribution and Chi-square test were performed to compare the responses. Results: A total of 294 questionnaires were completed at a response rate of 58.8%. 75% of GDP used alginate for primary impressions and 66% of SP preferred impression compound for the same. A majority of both SP and GDP favoured the used of custom trays (SP 81%, GDP 85%) and selective pressure technique (SP 84%, GDP 53%) for final impression. However, 85% of GDP used zinc-oxide eugenol and 62% of SP favoured elastomeric materials for the same. Most of the SP and GDP used chemical cured resin custom trays (SP 54%, GDP 75%), however, 86% of SP used spaced trays and almost 60% of GDP preferred close-fitting trays. Conclusions: The practice of GDP and SP with regards to CD impression materials and techniques differed significantly. Continued education and training for GDP and SP with respect to procedures and techniques related to CD is recommended.Keywords: Practice, Complete denture, Impression materials, Impression techniques, General dental practitioner, Specialist

References

United Nations . Report of the Second World Assembly on Aging. Madrid, Spain: United Nations. 2002.

Rao S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. A systematic review of impression technique for conventional complete denture. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(2): 105–11.

Rashid H, Vohra FA, Haidry TZ, Karmani GD. Stabilizing mandibular complete dentures using the neutral zone impression technique. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2013;22(2):154–9.

McCord JF. Contemporary techniques for denture fabrication. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(2):106–11.

Drago CJ. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2003;12(3):192–7.

Makzoume JE. Morphologic comparison of two neutral zone impression techniques: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(6):563–8.

McCord JF, Grant AA. Impression making. Br Dent J 2000;188(9):484–92.

Boucher CO. Complete denture prosthodontics--the state of the art. 1975. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(4):309–15.

Carlsson GE. Facts and fallacies: an evidence base for complete dentures. Dent Update 2006;33(3):134–6.

Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Current concepts and techniques in complete denture final impression procedures. J Prosthodont 2003;12(4):280–7.

Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2005;14(4):253–62.

Hanif A, Khan J, Banghash MFK. Impression Techniques And Materials Used For Fabrication Of Complete Denture. A Survey. Pak Oral Dent J 2014;34(1):170–3.

Baruch Y, Brooks CH. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations. 2008;61(8):1139–60.

Arbree NS, Fleck S, Askinas SW. The results of a brief survey of complete denture prosthodontic techniques in predoctoral programs in North American dental schools. J Prosthodont 1996;5(3):219–25.

Ozkurt Z, Dikbas I, Kazazoglu E. Predoctoral prosthodontic clinical curriculum for complete dentures: survey in Turkish dental schools. J Dent Educ 2013;77(1):93–8.

Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Complete denture education in U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont. 2005;14(3): 191–7.

Kakatkar VR. Complete denture impression techniques practiced by private dental practitioners: a survey. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13(3):233–5.

Mehra M, Vahidi F, Berg RW. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States. J Prosthodont 2014;23(4):320–7.

Khan SB, Geerts G. Determining the dimensional stability, fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured acrylic resin custom tray material. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17(2):67–72.

Ferreira FM,Novais VR, Simamoto Jr PC, Soares CJ, Fernandes Neto AJ. Evaluation of knowledge about disinfection of dental impressions in several dental schools. Rev Odontol Bras Central 2010;19(51):285–9.

Shaba OP, Adegbulugbe IC, Oderinu OH. Dimensional stability of alginate impression material over a four hours time frame. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2007;17(1):1–4.

Garcia Lda F, Roselino Lde M, Mundim FM, Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Consani S. Influence of artificial accelerated aging on dimensional stability of acrylic resins submitted to different storage protocols. J Prosthodont 2010;19(6):432–7.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-01