PREVALANCE OF SECOND MESIOBUCCAL CANAL IN MAXILLARY SECOND MOLARS ON THE BASIS OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS

Authors

  • Iftikhar Akbar Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Junaid Islam Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Abbottabad International Dental College Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Abdul Majeed Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental college Peshawar-Pakistan
  • Rizwan Qureshi Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad-Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-04-11877

Keywords:

Endodontic treatment, Maxillary Molar, Root canal anatomy

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of the second mesiobuccal canal in permanent maxillary second molar in patients presenting to Peshawar Dental College and Hospital. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients advised for root canal treatment in the maxillary second molars participated in the study. Two detection procedures, clinical and radio graphical examination were used. Two pre-operative radiographs with different angulations and one post-operative radiograph were taken to examine roots and root canals. Access cavities were prepared and the second mesiobuccal canal was explored using magnifying dental loupes (3.5 x), endodontic explorer (DG16) and size 10 K-file. Descriptive statistics were recorded as percentages, frequencies and mean. The chi-square test was used for gender, age-wise comparison and right and left side of the maxillary jaw. Results: One hundred and twenty patients were recruited in the study. There were 65 (54.2%) males and 55 (45.8%) females. The second mesiobuccal canal was more common in males compared to females (p-value=0.434). The second mesiobuccal canal was most commonly found in 3rd decade with mean age, of 40.5±12.31, (p-value =0.51). The frequencies and percentages of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary second molars on the right and left side of the jaw were 70 (58.3%) and 50 (41.7%) respectively (p-value =0.310). Conclusion: The second mesiobuccal canal was found in less than half of the second molars. The most successful method of detection in this study was both clinical and radiographic.  

Author Biographies

Iftikhar Akbar, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan

 

Junaid Islam, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Abbottabad International Dental College Abbottabad-Pakistan

 

Abdul Majeed, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peshawar Dental college Peshawar-Pakistan

 

Rizwan Qureshi, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad-Pakistan

 

References

Fernandes NA, Herbst D, Postma TC, Bunn BK. The prevalence of second canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: A cone beam computed tomography study. Aust Endod J 2019;45(1):46–50.

Khademi A, Naser AZ, Bahreinian Z, Mehdizadeh M, Najarian M, Khazaei S. Root Morphology and Canal Configuration of First and Second Maxillary Molars in a Selected Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation. Iran Endod J 2017;12(3):288–92.

Naseri M, Ali Mozayeni M, Safi Y, Heidarnia M, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Norouzi N. Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Second Molars according to Age and Gender in a Selected Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation. Iran Endod J 2018;13(3):373–80.

Alfouzan K, Alfadley A, Alkadi L, Alhezam A, Jamleh A. Detecting the Second Mesiobuccal Canal in Maxillary Molars in a Saudi Arabian Population: A Micro-CT Study. Scanning 2019;2019:9568307.

Betancourt P, Navarro P, Cantín M, Fuentes R. Cone-beam computed tomography study of prevalence and location of MB2 canal in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(6):9128–34.

Olczak K, Pawlicka H. The morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a polish population. BMC Med Imaging 2017;17(1):68.

Zeng C, Shen Y, Guan X, Wang X, Fan M, Li Y. Rare Root Canal Configuration of Bilateral Maxillary Second Molar Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning. J Endod 2016;42(4):673–7.

Natanasabapathy V, Randhya R, Sundar S, Kowsky D, Arul B. Unusual Location of a Second Mesiobuccal Canal in the Maxillary First Molar managed with the Aid of Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Ope Dent Endod 2016;1:35–8.

Ratanajirasut R, Panichuttra A, Panmekiate S. A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study of Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Permanent Molars in a Thai Population. J Endod 2018;44(1):56–61.

Lee SJ, Lee EH, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the prevalence and location of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars. Restor Dent Endod 2020;45(4):46.

Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J 2011;44(2):162–9.

Coelho MS, Lacerda MFLS, Chagas Silva MH, Rios MA. Locating the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary molars: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018;10:195–202.

Mashyakhy M, Jabali A, Albar N, AbuMelha A, Alkahtany M, Bajawi H, et.al. Root and canal configurations of maxillary molars in a Saudi subpopulation (Southern region): In vivo cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J 2022;12(2):180–5.

Anirudhan S, Suneelkumar C, Uppalapati H, Anumula L, Kirubakaran R. Detection of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars of the Indian population-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent 2022;4:1.

Verma P, Love RM. A Micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth. Int Endod J 2011;44(3):210–7.

Yasser F, bin Shehzad H, Chaudry A. Frequency of Second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molar detected through cone beam computed tomography. Pak Oral Dent J 2022;42(1):36–8.

Alnowailaty Y, Alghamdi F. The Prevalence and Location of the Second Mesiobuccal Canals in Maxillary First and Second Molars Assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Cureus 2022;14(5):e24900.

Magalhães J, Velozo C, Albuquerque D, Soares C, Oliveira H, Pontual ML, et al. Morphological Study of Root Canals of Maxillary Molars by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Sci World J 2022;2022:4766305.

Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod 2010;36(5):867–70.

Martins JN, Marques D, Silva EJ, Caramês J, Mata A, Versiani MA. Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars—a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol 2020;113:104589.

Additional Files

Published

2023-10-10