CORRELATION BETWEEN FACIOLINGUAL INCLINATION OF MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORS AND MOLARS WITH MAXILLARY AND MANDIBULAR MORPHOLOGY

Authors

  • Abdul Muqeet Chughtai College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan
  • Waqar Jeelani College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan
  • Maheen Ahmed College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan
  • Muhammad Aman College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan

Keywords:

Cone-beam computed tomography, correlations, esthetics

Abstract

Background: The torque of maxillary incisors and molars forms an important component of smile esthetics. The inclination of these teeth may be affected by maxillary and mandibular dimensions. The study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the faciolingual inclinations of maxillary incisors and first molars with palatal width (PW), palatal depth (PD), maxillomandibular angle (MMA) and mandibular width (MW) using cone beam computed tomography scans. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 66 adult subjects (males-37; females-29) was performed. The Planmeca Romexis viewer 6.2.1 software was utilized to determine the faciolingual inclination of the maxillary central incisor (UIPP) and first molars (right-MMR; left-MML). The correlation of UIPP, MMR and MML with age, PW, PD, MW and MMA was determined using Pearson’s correlation. Results: The mean age of the sample was 32.8±11.4 years. The UIPP showed a mild negative correlation with age (r=-0.430; p<0.001). Only the PW showed a mild significant correlation with MMR (r=-0.287; p=0.019) and MML (r=-0.343; p=0.005). All the other maxillomandibular parameters had insignificant (p>0.05) correlations with the inclinations of maxillary incisors and molars. Conclusion: The current study concludes that the PW had a significant inverse correlation with bilateral maxillary molar inclinations. Other parameters such as MMA, MW and PD had no statistically significant correlation with incisors and molars inclinations.

Author Biographies

Abdul Muqeet Chughtai, College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan

 

Waqar Jeelani, College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan

 

Maheen Ahmed, College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan

 

Muhammad Aman, College of Dentistry, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Northern Bypass, Multan-Pakistan

 

References

Havens DC, McNamara Jr JA, Sigler LM, Baccetti T. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 2010;80(2):322–8.

Majumder D, Hegde MN, Singh S, Gupta A, Acharya SR, Karunakar P, et al. Recommended clinical practice guidelines of aesthetic dentistry for Indians: An expert consensus. J Conserv Dent 2022;25(2):110–21.

Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, D O'Brien K. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3(3):CD003452.

Nascimento DC, Santos ÊR, Machado AW, Bittencourt MA. Influence of buccal corridor dimension on smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17:145–50.

Graber LW, Vig KW, Huang GJ, Fleming P. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.

Mah JK, Yi L, Huang RC, Choo H. Advanced applications of cone beam computed tomography in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011;17:57–71.

Janson G, Bombonatti R, Cruz KS, Hasunuma CY, Santo Jr MD. Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125(3):316–22.

Eraydin F, Cakan DG, Tozlu M, Ozdemir F. Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types. Korean J Orthod 2018;48(5):333–8.

Badiee M, Ebadifar A, Sajedi S. Mesiodistal angulation of posterior teeth in orthodontic patients with different facial growth patterns. J Dent Res Clin Dent Prospects 2019;13(4):267–73.

Bin Dakhil N, Bin Salamah F. The Diagnosis Methods and Management Modalities of Maxillary Transverse Discrepancy. Cureus 2021;13(12)e20482.

Kumar SS, Thailavathy V, Srinivasan D, Loganathan D, Yamini J. Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017;9(Suppl 1):S92.

Ganeiber T, Bugaighis I. Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya. J Orthod Sci 2018;7:14.

Puri T. Panoramic radiographs for investigating skeletal patterns-A comparative study. Int J Dent Res 2019;4(2):66–78.

Wei D, Zhang L, Li W, Jia Y. Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors. Turk J Orthod 2020;33:85–91.

Arvind TR, Sravana Dinesh SP. Can palatal depth influence the buccolingual inclination of molars? A cone beam computed tomography-based retrospective evaluation. J Orthod 2020;47:303–10.

Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:1–19.

Fontana M, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Nucera R, Militi A, Lucchese A, et al. Correlation between mesio-distal angulation and bucco-lingual inclination of first and second maxillary premolars evaluated with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Appl Sci 2021;11:1–10.

Moreno Uribe LM, Miller SF. Genetics of the dentofacial variation in human malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18:91–9.

Vasquez JM, Escobar C, Fuentes LI, Sánchez CA. Correlation between transverse maxillary discrepancy and the inclination of first permanent molars. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2017;28:354–73.

Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Keilig L, Patcas R, Affolter S, Eliades T, et al. Torque differences according to tooth morphology and bracket placement: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:411–8.

Kotrashetti VS, Mallapur MD. Radiographic assessment of facial soft tissue thickness in South Indian population–An anthropologic study. J Forensic Leg Med 2016;39:161–8.

Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:15–23.

Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:102–21.

Björk A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method. Acta Odontol Scand 1966;24(2):109–27.

Sharma A, Garg A, Marothiya S, Thukral R, Tripathi A. Comparison of dentoalveolar height and central incisor inclination in maxilla and mandible among different facial growth pattern individual in vertical plane in cosmopolitan samples of Malwa region of Madhya Pradesh. J Contemp Orthod 2021;5(4):21–5.

Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;124:4–12.

Lee KJ, Jeon HH, Boucher N, Chung CH. Transverse Analysis of Maxilla and Mandible in Adults with Normal Occlusion: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Imaging 2022;8(4):1–11.

Published

2024-03-31