PRACTICE OF ENDODONTIC RE-TREATMENT IN FOUR CITIES OF PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Sana Ehsen Nagi Aga Khan university and hospital
  • Farhan Raza Khan
  • Munawar Rahman

Abstract

Background: Root canal re-treatment is the procedure of choice when the primary root treatment fails but patient is inclined toward salvage of the tooth. The re-treatment is often a challenging procedure owing to lack to the predictability in the outcomes. Since, there is a no single way of planning and executing such procedure, a study was planned to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding endodontic re-treatment among Pakistani dentists. The effect of clinical experience on the re-treatment planning was also determined. Methods: A survey was conducted by distributing a questionnaire among 240 dentists practicing in four major cities of Pakistan. Frequency distribution of the gender, experience, designation of the participants etc. was determined. A case scenario was also shared and responses upon decision making were noted. Chi square test was applied to see if re-treatment decision of experienced dentists (>5 years’ practice) was significantly different than less experienced dentists. Results: Out of 240 forms, 160 were received (response rate of 66.67%). The most commonly reported reason for endodontic re-treatment was under prepared/ under filled canals. Nearly 40% participants reported doing re-treatment with hand instruments only and 15% did not employ any solvent during re-treatment. There were no significant differences between the less experienced and the more experienced dentists on re-treatment decisions. Conclusions: Almost half of the dentists reported inappropriate decision making in re-treatment. This shows that in endodontic re-treatment practice in major cities of Pakistan falls short of internationally accepted standards. There is a significant difference in treatment planning done by more experienced dentists compared to ones with <5 years’ clinical experience.Keywords: Endodontics; Failed root canals: Re-treatment; Survey; Root canal 

Author Biography

Sana Ehsen Nagi, Aga Khan university and hospital

resident operative dentistry. AKUH

References

Chandra A. Discuss the factors that affect the outcome of endodontic treatment. Aust Endod J 2009;35(2):98–107.

Barletta FB, de Sousa Reis M, Wagner M, Borges JC, Dall'Agnol C. Computed tomography assessment of three techniques for removal of filling material. Aust Endod J 2008;34(3):101–5.

Rios Mde A, Villela AM, Cunha RS, Velasco RC, De Martin AS, Kato AS, et al. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. J Endod 2014;40(4):543–6.

Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF Jr. Exuberant biofilm infection in a lateral canal as the cause of short-term endodontic treatment failure: Report of a case. J Endod 2013;39(5):712–8.

Bodrumlu E, Uzun O, Topuz O, Semiz M. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2008:74(8):721.

Faria-Júnior NB, Loiola LE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Berbert FL, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and resilon. Braz Dent J 2011:22(1):41–4.

Aminsobhani M, Meraji N. A case of successful retreatment of a maxillary lateral incisor with a supernumerary root. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12(10):784–8.

Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S. Outcomes of Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Endod 2009;35(7):930–7.

Shemesh H, Roeleveld AC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Damage to root dentin during retreatment procedures. J Endod 2011;37(1):63–6.

Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J 2007;40(12):921–39.

Jawad S, Taylor C, Roudsari RV, Darcey J, Qualtrough A. Modern Endodontic Planning Part 1: Assessing Complexity and Predicting Success. Dent Update 2015;42(7):599–608.

Song M, Kim SG, Lee SJ, Kim B, Kim E. Prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: A prospective study. J Endod 2013;39(12):1491–7.

Tsesis I, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Rosen E. Outcome of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod 2009;35(11):1505–11.

Kang M, In Jung H, Song M, Kim SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19(3):569–82.

Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 2 Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008;41(1):6–31.

Nagi SE, Khan FR, Rahman M. Endodontic retreatment. Pak Oral Dent J 2014;34(4):722–5.

Cruz EV, Jimena ME, Puzon EG, Iwaku M. Endodontic teaching in Philippine dental schools. Int Endod J 2000;33(5):427–34.

Good ML, McCammon A. Removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealer: A literature review and an audit comparing current practice in dental schools. Dent Update 2012;39(10):703–8.

Khan FR, Mahmud S, Rahman M. Comparison of knowledge regarding endodontic materials and techniques among dentists employed at dental institutions and private practices in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Dent Assoc 2015;24(1):11–6.

Hommez GM, De Moor RJ, Braem M. Endodontic treatment performed by Flemish dentists. Part 2. Canal filling and decision making for referrals and treatment of apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2003;36(5):344–51.

Hussain SM, Khan FR. A survey on endodontic irrigants used by dentists in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J 2014;34(4):730–4.

Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod 2014;40(5):618–24.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-25

Most read articles by the same author(s)