OCCLUSAL OUTCOME OF NON-EXTRACTION AND ALL FIRST PREMOLARS EXTRACTION TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CLASS-I MALOCCLUSION

Authors

  • Adeel Tahir Kamal Aga Khan University Hospital
  • Attiya Shaikh Aga Khan University
  • Mubassar Fida Aga Khan University

Abstract

Background: Class-1 malocclusion commonly presents with crowding and poses an aesthetic concern to patients. An orthodontist may encounter a variety of dental problems and must handle them strategically to establish adequate occlusal relationships. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the occlusal characteristics of patients who have undergone non-extraction or all first premolars extraction treatment for class I malocclusion using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Methods: The pre-treatment and post treatment dental casts of 94 subjects with class-I malocclusion were retrospectively screened. The sample was distributed into two groups, i.e., non-extraction and all first premolars extraction groups. The Mann Whitney-U test was used to compare the mean percentage improvement in the PAR scores between the two groups. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean percentage improvement in the non-extraction group was 74.28% in the non-extraction group and 74.5% in the all first premolars extraction group. A significant difference (p=0.04) was found between the pre-treatment PAR scores for the two treatment modalities. There was no significant difference between the post treatment PAR scores (p=0.45) and the mean percentage improvement in PAR scores (p=0.41) between the treatment groups. Conclusions: The improvement in occlusal characteristics in patients who underwent non-extraction treatment and all first premolar extraction treatment was comparable as assessed through mean percentage improvement in PAR scores.Keywords: Angle class I; Index; Occlusion; Malocclusion

Author Biographies

Adeel Tahir Kamal, Aga Khan University Hospital

OrthodonticsResident II

Attiya Shaikh, Aga Khan University

Consultant Orthodontist/Assistant Professor,Program Director Orthodontics Residency ProgramSection of Dentistry, Department of Surgery,

Mubassar Fida, Aga Khan University

Consultant Orthodontist/Associate Professor,Section of Dentistry, Department of Surgery,

References

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, Akerman JL, editors. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013.

Illeri Z, Bascifti FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012;34(6):681–5.

Nazir R, Amanat N, Rizvi KR. Pattern, prevalence and severity of malocclusion among university students. J Pak Dent Assoc 2013;22(1):13–8.

Melo L, Ono Y, Takagi Y. Indicators of mandibular dental crowding in the mixed dentition. Pediatr Dent 2001;23(2):118–22.

Jansen G, Barros SE, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and non-extraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(4):490–8.

Konstantonis D, Anthopulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in class I malocclusions. Prog Orthod 2013;14:47.

Mahmood TMA, Qadir CA. Persuading factors for tooth extraction decision in treatment of class I malocclusion among orthodontists in Sulaimani city. J Dent Med Sci 2015;14(8):20–8.

Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs non-extraction treatment on soft tissue changes in class I borderline malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2012:82(2);209–17.

Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971;59(6):552–67.

Eismann D. A method of evaluating the efficiency of orthodontic treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1974:223–32.

Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontics treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11(3):309–20.

Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB. Jones R, Stephans CD, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14(2):125–39.

Dyken RA, Sadowsky LP, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Angle Orthod 2001;71(3):164–8.

Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 2000;27(2):149–62.

Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125(3);270–8.

Buchanan IB, Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Andrews M. A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR index and Summers’Occlusal index. Eur J Orthod 1993;15(1):27–31.

Pickering EA, Vig P. The Occlusal Index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1976;2(1):47–51.

Mascarenhas AK, Vig K. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in educational and private practice settings. J Dent Educ 2001;66(1):94–9.

Firestone AR, Beck FM, Beglin FM, Vig KW. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(5):463–9.

Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD. The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1995;107(1):1–10.

Akinci Cansunar H, Uysal T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(5):595–602.

Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarellia FP Freitas MR, Janson G. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78(2):270–4.

Bäckström H, Mohlin B. Quality assessment in orthodontics using the IOTN and PAR indices. Tandläkartidningen 1998;90:49–57.

Willems G, Heidbuchel R, Verdonk A, Carels C. Treatment and standard evaluation using the peer assessment rating index. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5(1):57–62.

Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(3):316–23.

Graber TM, Vanarsdall Jr RL, Vig KWL, editors. Orthodontics Current: principles and techniques. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2012.

Onyeaso CO, Begole EA. Orthodontic treatment-improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index. Angle Orthod 2006;76(2):260–4.

de Frietas KM, de Frietas MR, Janson G, Pinzan A, Henriques JF. Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to post treatment stability. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14(5):324–9.

Ahmad N, Fida M. Orthodontic treatment outcome assessment using peer assessment Rating (PAR) Index. Pak Oral Dent J 2010;30(2):380–6.

Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, Power MP. An assessment of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod 1998;68(6):527–34.

Birkeland K, Furevik J, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19(3):279–88.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>