FREQUENCY OF DENTOFACIAL ASYMMETRIES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS

Authors

  • Nita Kumari Bhateja
  • Mubassar Fida
  • Attiya Shaikh

Abstract

Background: Correction of orthodontic asymmetries is crucial to achieve functional occlusion, aesthetics and stability of post orthodontic treatment results. To date valid frequency data of dentofacial asymmetries in Pakistani orthodontic patients do not exist to document orthodontic treatment need. The objectives of this study were to determine frequency of dento-facial asymmetries, severity of dental asymmetries and to determine difference in frequency of dentofacial asymmetries in mixed and permanent dentition. Methods: The sample of this cross-sectional study comprised of 280 patients (177 females and 103 males) with no history of previous orthodontic treatment having no craniofacial anomalies. Dento-facial asymmetries were assessed from pre-treatment records of patients. Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequency of dentofacial asymmetries and severity of dental asymmetries. Chi-square test was used to determine difference in frequency of dentofacial asymmetries in mixed and permanent dentition. Results: Seventy eight percent (219) of patients had noncoincident midlines, 67.5% (189) had mandibular midline asymmetry, 43.2% (122) had molar asymmetry, 15.7% (44) had mandibular arch asymmetry, 14.3% (40) had maxillary midline asymmetry, 13.6% (38) had maxillary arch asymmetry, 6.1% (17) had nose deviation, and 12.1% (34) had facial asymmetry and chin deviation. In most patients dental midlines were deviated from one another and from facial midline by ¼ lower incisor widths, while molar asymmetry was found in most patients by ¼ cusp width. Mandibular arch asymmetry was more frequent in permanent than mixed dentition (p=0.054). Conclusions: Non-coincident dental midline is most commonly seen. Nose deviation is least commonly observed. Mandibular arch asymmetry is more frequent in permanent than mixed dentitionKeywords: Dentofacial, asymmetry, orthodontic, frequency

References

Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod 1994;64:89–98.

Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997;12:171–6.

Mullikan JB, Ferraro NF, Vento AR. A retrospective analysis of growth of the constructed condyle-ramus in children with hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J 1989;26:312–7.

Proffit WR, Viq KW, Turvey TA. Early fracture of the mandibular condyles: Frequently an unsuspected cause of growth distrubances. Am J Orthod 1980;78:1–24.

Huang YL, Pogrel MA, Kaban LB. Diagnosis and management of condylar resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:114–9.

Walters M, Claes P, Kakulas E, Clement JG. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:36–42.

Travieso R, Chang CC, Terner JS, Beckett J, Wong K, Teng E, et al. A range of condylar hypoplasia exists in Treacher Collins syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:393–7.

Myung Y, Lee YH, Chang H. Surgical correction of progressive hemifacial atrophy with onlay bone graft combined with soft tissue augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1841–4.

Demant S, Hermann NV, Darvann TA, Zak M, Schatz H, Larsen P et al. 3D analysis of facial asymmetry in subjects with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:586–92.

Zhang X, Chen M, Wu Y, Wang B, Yang C. Management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis associated with mandibular asymmetry in infancy. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1316–9.

Arendt DM, Whitt JC, Hon CB, Curran TJ, Bate WS. Facial asymmetry. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:688–90.

Kennedy DB. Treatment strategies for ankylosed primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009;10:201–10.

Barberia-Leache E, Suarez-Clúa MC, Saavedra-Ontiveros D. Ectopic eruption of the maxillary first permanent molar: characteristics and occurrence in growing children. Angle Orthod 2005;75:610–5.

Park JH, Okadakage S, Sato Y, Akamatsu Y, Tai K. Orthodontic treatment of a congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisor. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:297–312.

Reagan SE. Correcting space loss caused by severe decay: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:878–9

Nowak AJ, Creedon RL, Musselman RJ, Troutman KC. Summary of the conference on radiation exposure in pediatric dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1981;103:426–8.

Shroff B, Siegel SM. Treatment of patients with asymmetries using asymmetric mechanics. Semin Orthod 1998;4:165–79.

Rebellato J. Asymmetrical extractions used in the treatment of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:180–8.

Legan HL. Surgical correction of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:189–98.

McCarthy JG, Williams JK, Grayson BH, Crombie JS. Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible: device development and clinical application. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:322–9.

Jeon YJ, Kim YH, Son WS, Hans MG. Correction of a canted occlusal plane with miniscrews in a patient with facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:244–52.

Sheats RD, McGorray SP, Musmar Q, Wheeler TT, KingGJ. Prevalance of orthodontic asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;40:138–45.

Behbehani F, Roy R, Al-Jame B. Prevalence of asymmetric molar and canine relationship. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:686–92.

Murshid ZA, Amin HE, Al-Nowaiser AM. Distribution of certain types of occlusal anomalies among Saudi Arabian adolescents in Jeddah city. Community Dent Health 2010;27:238–41.

Borzabadi-Farahani A, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Eslamipour F. Malocclusion and occlusal traits in an Arban Iranian population. An epidemiological study of 11- to 14-year-old children. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:477–84

Downloads

Published

2014-06-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>