• Mukhtar Ahmad
  • Kishwar Ali
  • Humera Latif
  • Saman Naz
  • Khalid Said


Background: Delayed primary closure in cases of acute appendicitis is debated among the surgeons as to whether it decreases the rate of wound infection in comparison to primary closure. The aim of this study was to find out the optimal method of wound closure in cases of perforated appendicitis. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at the surgical units of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from May to November 2012. A total of 158 patients having perforated appendicitis were included in the study. They were randomly divided two groups. The wounds were primarily closed in one group and left open with daily saline soaked dressing, to be closed on postoperative day 4 in case of the other group. The main outcome measure was wound infection. A wound was considered infected if it was discharging pus, was red and swollen on postoperative day 8th. The method of wound closure was considered efficacious if there was no wound infection till 8th postoperative day. Results: A total of 158 patients, 56 (35.4%) male and 102 (64.6%) female were included in the study. Primary closure group had a total number of 79 patients with 26 (32.9%) male and 53 (67.1%) female. Delayed primary group had also a total number of 79 patients with 30 (38%) male and 49 (62%) female. The mean age of patients in the primary closure group was 26.67±7.32 years while in the delayed primary group was 28.15±6.88 years. In the entire series, 36 (22.8%) patients developed wound infection. There was a significant association between wound infection and type of skin closure (Delayed Primary Closure 6.3% vs. Primary Closure 39.2%, p<0.000). Conclusion: Delayed Primary closure is the optimal management strategy in case of perforated appendicitis as it decreases the incidence of wound infection.Keywords: Delayed primary closure, primary closure, perforated appendicitis, wound, infection


O’Connell PR, The vermiform appendix. In: Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK, O’Connell PR, editors. Bailey and Love’s short practice of surgery. 25th ed. UK: Edward Arnold Ltd; 2008.p. 1204–11.

Mehrabi Bahar M, Jangjoo A, Amouzeshi A, Kavianifar K. Wound infection incidence in patients with simple and gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. Arch Iran Med 2010;13:13–6.

Chamisa I. A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009;91:688–92.

Bickel A, Gurevits M, Vamos R, Ivry S, Eitan A. Perioperative hyperoxygenation and wound site infection following surgery for acute appendicitis: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146:464–70.

Misteli H, Kalbermatten D, Settelen C. Simple and complicated surgical wounds. Ther Umsch. 2012;69:23–7.

Sookpotarom P, Khampiwmar W, Termwattanaphakdee T. Vigorous wound irrigation followed by subcuticular skin closure in children with perforated appendicitis. J Med Assoc Thai 2010;93:318–23.

Pauniaho SL, Lahdes-Vasama T, Helminen MT, Iber T, Mäkelä E, Pajulo O. Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies. Scand J Surg 2010;99:142–6.

Duttaroy DD, Jitendra J, Duttaroy B, Bansal U, Dhameja P, Patel G, et al. Management Strategy for Dirty Abdominal Incisions: Primary or Delayed Primary Closure? A Randomized Trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2009;10:129–36.

Chiang RA, Chen SL, Tsai YC, Bair MJ. Comparison of primary wound closure versus open wound management in perforated appendicitis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105:791–5.

Roger AD, Hampton MI, Bunting M, Atherstone AK. Audit of Appendicectomies at Frere hospital, Eastern Cape. S Afr J Surg 2008;46(3):74–7.

Towfigh S, Clarke T, Yacoub W, Pooli AH, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N, etal. Significant reduction of wound infections with daily probing of contaminated wounds: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 2011;146:448–52.

Davey PG, Nathwani D. What is the value of preventing postoperative infections? New Horiz 1998;6(2 Suppl):S64–71.

Shulkin DJ, Kinosian B, Glick H, Glen-Puschett C, Daly J, Eisenberg JM. The economic impact of infections. An analysis of hospital costs and charges in surgical patients with cancer. Arch Surg 1993;128:449–52.

Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sorensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV. Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;113:283–95.

Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Jr. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 1992;163:324–30.

Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284(6320):931–3.

Irvin TT, Stoddard CJ, Greaney MG, Duthie HL. Abdominal wound healing: a prospective clinical study. Br Med J 1977;2(6083):351–2.

Haddad V, Macon WL 4th. Abdominal wound dehiscence and evisceration: contributing factors and improved mortality. Am Surg. 1980;46:508–13.

Cohn SM, Giannotti G, Ong AW, Varela JE, Shatz DV, McKenney MG, et al. Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds. Ann Surg. 2001;233:409–13.

Hepburn HH. Delayed primary suture of wounds. Br Med J. 1919;1(3033): 181–3.

Wilke DP. Observations on mortality in acute appendicular disease. Br Med J 1931;1(3658): 253–5.

Coller FA, Valk WL. The delayed closure of contaminated wounds. A preliminary report. Ann Surg 1940;112:256–70.

Wilson H. Secondary Suture of War Wounds: A Clinical Study of 305 Secondary Closures. Ann Surg 1945;121:152–6.

Grosfeld JL, Solit RW. Prevention of wound infection in perforated appendicitis: experience with delayed primary wound closure. Ann Surg 1968;168:891–5.

Lemieur TP, Rodriguez JL, Jacobs DM, Bennett ME, West MA. Wound management in perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 1999;65:439–43.

Yellin AE, Berne TV, Heseltine PN, Appleman MD, Gill M, Chin A, et al. Prospective randomized study of two different doses of clindamycin admixed with gentamicin in the management of perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 1993;4:248–55.

Tsang TM, Tam PKH, Saing H. Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. Arch Surg 1992;127:451–53.

Pettigrew RA. Delayed primary wound closure in gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg 1981;68:635–8.

Andersen B, Bendtsen A, Holbraad L, Schantz A. Wound infections after appendicectomy. I. A controlled trial on the prophylactic efficacy of topical ampicillin in non-perforated appendicitis. II. A controlled trial on the prophylactic efficacy of delayed primary suture and topical ampicillin in perforated appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1972;138:531–6.

Henry MC, Moss RL. Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2005 Aug;21(8):625–30.

Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panagopoulos G, Schein M, Wise L. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: A meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily Surgery.2002;127:136–41.

Khan KI, Mahmood S, Akmal M, Waqas A. Comparison of rate of surgical wound infection, length of hospital stay and patient convenience in complicated appendicitis between primary closure and delayed primary closure. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:596–8.

Statistics by Country for Acute Appendicitis. US Census Bureau, International Data Base, 2004.

Chiang RA, Chen SL, Tsai YC. Delayed primary closure versus primary closure for wound management in perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Chin Med Assoc 2012;75:156–9



Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2