PROBLEMS OF GROUP DYNAMICS IN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING SESSIONS
Abstract
Background: Beneficial effects of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in medical education are often emphasized. However, there is another side of the coin. This study was conducted to find out frequency of PBL group problems in our setup and the influence of these problems on students’ learning. We also compared the perception of students and tutors as regard to frequency and level of hindrance caused by these problems in PBL sessions. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad. 100 students of 3rd year MBBS of 2011 and their 17 PBL tutors were asked to fill a questionnaire. They were asked to rank the factors according to frequency (perceived frequency) and according to the level of hindrance to learning these factors are causing. All data was entered and analysed using SPSS-12. Results: Students ranked “Dominant student” as the most important problem and “Psychosocial factors” as the least important problem. Tutors ranked “Quiet student” as the most important problem and “Personality clash” as the least important factor. Student’s ranked “Dominant student” as the problem causes most hindrance and “Quiet student” as the problem causing least hindrance. Tutors ranked “Lack of commitment” as the problem causing most hindrance and “Personality clash” as the problem causing least hindrance. There was good agreement between the students and the tutors on all the factors regarding important problem except “Lateness, absenteeism” (p=0.04) and “Personality clash” (p=0.001).Similarly there was good agreement between the students and the tutors on all the factors regarding hindrance except “Lack of commitment” (p= 0.015) and “Personality clash” (p=0.023). Conclusion: The present study showed that from both students’ and tutors’ perspectives, the ranking of most important problems that can disturb PBL session function and the level of hindrance they cause were statistically similar for majority of the problems.Keywords: Problem-based learning, tutorial group problems, teachers’/students’ perceptions, group’s dysfunction, problems’ frequency/importanceReferences
Khoo HE. Implementation of problem-based learning in Asian medical schools and students' perceptions of their experience. Med Educ 2003;37:401–9
Birgegard G, Lindquist U. Change in student attitudes to medical school after the introduction of problem-based learning in spite of low ratings. Med Educ 1998;32:46–9.
Khan H, Taqui AM, Khawaja MR, Fatmi Z. Problem-Based Versus Conventional Curricula: Influence on Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical Students Towards Health Research. PLoS One 2007;2(7):e632.
Faidley J, Evensen D H, Salisbury-Glennon J, Glenn J, Hmleo CE. How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context, in: D.H. Evensen & C.E. Hmleo (Eds) Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions 2000 pp.109–135 (Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum).
Fendry GD, Frommer M, Walker RA. Constructivism and problem-based learning, Journal of Further and Higher Education 1999;23(3):359–71.
Hendry GD, Ryan G, Harris J. Group problems in problem-based learning University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Med Teach 2003;25(6):609–16.
Tipping J, Freeman RF, Rachlis AR. Using faculty and student perceptions of group dynamics to develop recommendations for PBL training. Acad Med 1995;70:1050–2.
Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993;38:52–81.
Dolmans DH, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research, Med Educ 2005;39(7):732–41.
Hendry GD. Tutors’ perceptions of dysfunctional behaviour in problem-based learning tutorial groups, HERDSA News 2002; 24(1),pp. 27–30.
Hitchcock MA, Anderson AS. Dealing with dysfunctional tutorial groups, Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1997;9(1):19–24.
Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Van Der Vleuten CP. Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groups. Acad Med 1998;73(Suppl):S22¬4
Zonolli MB, Boshuzen HP, De Grave WS. Students’ and tutors’ perceptions of problems in PBL tutorial groups at a brazilian medical school. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2002;15(2):189-201
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
