VAGINAL BREECH DELIVERY: STILL A SAFE OPTION
AbstractBackground: Elective caesarean section has replaced vaginal delivery for term breech foetuses due to fear of complications of vaginal breech delivery. This increasing rate of caesarean section worldwide is alarming. It has not only led to increase in adverse consequences in subsequent pregnancies and future fertility but also loss of skills for vaginal breech delivery. This study was conducted to determine the safety of vaginal breech birth in terms of maternal and neonatal complications. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad from January 2004 to December 2011. One seventy-eight women having successful vaginal breech delivery of singleton term foetuses from 2004–2008 were selected. They were studied for neonatal complications like low Apgar score (AS) <7 at 5 min, birth trauma, admission to neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality. Maternal complications including any genital tract trauma and post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) were also noted. Results: There were 11243 deliveries during this period, including 674 breech presentations at term (incidence of breech 6%). Out of 178 successful vaginal breech deliveries, 8 (4.49%) neonates had AS <7 at 5 min, and 6 (3.37%) neonates needed NICU admission. There were no cases of birth trauma or perinatal morbidity. Maternal complications occurred in only 5 (2.8%) patients, 2 (1.1%) having perineal tears, 2 (1.12%) retained placenta and one (0.56%) case of post partum haemorrhage. Conclusion: Vaginal breech delivery can be safely undertaken without compromising maternal and neonatal outcome if strict criteria are met before and during labour.Keywords: Vaginal breech delivery, foeto-maternal outcome, breech, delivery
Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;1375–83.
Collea JV, Chein C, Quilligan EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: A study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:235–44.
Hauth JC, Conningham FG. Vaginal breech delivery is still justified. Obstet Gynecol (Am) 2002;99:1115–6.
Ezechi OC, Fasubaa OB, Kalu BEK, Nwokoo CA, Obiesssie LO. Caesarean Delivery: Why the Aversion? Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;21(2):164–7.
Keirse MJ. Evidence-based child birth only for breech babies? Birth 2002;29:55–9.
Kotaske A. Inappropriate use of randomized trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ 2004;329:1039–42.
Dean CL, Penn Z. The case for and against vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynaecol 2008;10:139–44.
Mazhar SB, Kausar S. Outcome of singleton breech deliveries beyond 28 weeks Gestation: the experience at MCH centre, PIMS. J Pak Med Assoc 2002;52:471–5.
Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtol D et al. PREMODA Study Group is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1002–11.
Jadoon S, Jadoon SM, Shah R. Maternal and neonatal complications in term breech delivered vaginally. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008;18:555–8.
Igwegbe AO, Monago EN, Ugboaja JO. Cesarean Versus Vaginal Delivery for Term Breech Presentation: A Comparative Analysis. Afr J Bio Med Res 2010;13:15–8.
Alarab M, Regan CO, O’Connell M, Keane DP, O’Herlihy C, Foley ME. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option. Obstet Gynaecol 2004;103:407–12.
Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD000166.
Krebs L, langhoff-Roos J. Elective cesarean delivery for term breech. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:690–6.
Rauf B, Ayub T. Maternal and perinatal outcome in term singleton breech presentation. J Postograd Med Inst2004;18:373–9.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.