REACTIVE BLOOD DONOR NOTIFICATION; THEIR RESPONSES AND PERCEPTIONS: EXPERIENCE FROM SOUTHERN PAKISTAN
AbstractBackground: Donor notification of reactive status is important to prevent the spread of disease. Response of reactive donors to seek confirmation and treatment is a direct reflection of their knowledge and attitudes towards transfusion transmittable infections. Method: A cross sectional observational study was conducted from August 2014 to July 2015 at the blood bank of a tertiary care hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Reactive donors’ notification and responses were noted with reasons of failure. A cross-sectional analytical survey with non-probability purposive sampling was done on 350 potential consenting blood donors using a pre-tested questionnaire to assess their knowledge and attitude about disease awareness, transmission routes, financial implications and disease sensitization. Result: Out of 16660 donations, 5.57% were rejected on positive screening tests. Repeat donors (69.5%) with primary to secondary qualifications constituted the bulk of reactive donors. Donor notification rate were 54.25% whereas 28.68% donors responded to blood bank in person. The survey showed limited awareness about transfusion transmitted infections. Respondents who were ignorant of disease spread through blood transfusion comprised of 48%. 96.6% donors did not know the financial impact of treatment and 69.7% were unable to afford it. Moreover, 94.9% donors were not protected against hepatitis B. Participants with secondary education had significantly less odds of being adequately knowledgeable (OR=0.372, 95% CI: 0.203–0.681, p value <0.01) but more likely to have a positive attitude. Conclusion: There is need for structured pre-donation counselling to sensitize donors about transfusion related diseases in resource limited countries where treatment costs are high and out of reach for most donors.Keywords: Blood donors; Donor notification; Transfusion transmittable diseases
WHO. Global Database on Blood Safety. World Health Organization. [Internet] Geneva. (Switzerland) 2011. [Cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/global_database/GDBS_Summary_Report_2011.pdf
US. Department of Health and Human Services: Screening for Hepatitis during the Domestic Medical Examination for Newly Arrived Refugees. [Internet] USA.2014 [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/pdf/domestic-hepatitis-screening- guidelines.pdf
Ali SA, Donahue RM, Qureshi H, Vermund SH. Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Pakistan: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Infect Dis 2009;13(1):9–19.
Arif A. Hepatitis B and C: Prevention is better than cure. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63(2):154–5.
WHO. Blood donor counseling: implementation guidelines. [Internet] Geneva. (Switzerland) 2014 [cited 2015 Nov 28]. Available from: http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/voluntary_donation/Blooddonorcounselling.pdf
Ownby HE, Korelitz JJ, Busch MP, Williams AE, Kleinman SH, Gilcher RO, et al. Loss of volunteer blood donors because of unconfirmed enzyme immunoassay screening results. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Transfusion 2003;37(2):199–205.
Kotwal U, Doda V, Arora S, Bhardwaj S. Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India. Asian J Transfus Sci 2015;9(1):18–22.
Kaur G, Kaur P, Basu S, Kaur R, Sharma S. Donor notification and counseling--experience and challenges. Transfus Apher Sci 2013;49(2):291–4.
Moyer LA, Shapirog CN, Shulman G, Brugliera PD, Alter MJ. A survey of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive blood donors: Degree of understanding and action taken after notification. Transfusion 1992;32(8):702–6.
Chaurasia R, Zaman S, Das B, Chatterjee K. Screening donated blood for transfusion transmittable infections by serology along with NAT and response rate to notification of reactive results: An Indian experience. J Blood Transfus 2014;2014.
Patel P, Patel S, Bhatt J, Bhatnagar N, Gajjar M, Shah M. Evaluation of response to donor notification of reactive transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) result. Natl J Integr Res Med 2012;3(2):20–5.
Agarwal N. Response rate of blood donors in the Uttarakhand region of India after notification of reactive test results on their blood samples. Blood Transfus 2014;12(Suppl 1):51–3.
Roshan TM, Rosline H, Ahmed SA, Rapiaah M, Khattak MN. Response rate of Malaysian blood donors with reactive screening test to transfusion medicine unit calls. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009;40(6):1315–21.
Franco E, Bagnato B, Marino MG, Meleleo C, Serino L, Zaratti L. Hepatitis B: Epidemiology and prevention in developing countries. World J Hepatol 2012;4(3):74–80.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.