PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT TO AMPUTATION: VARIATIONS ON THE BASES OF SEX, AGE AND CAUSE OF LIMB LOSS

Authors

  • Shaista Ali college of home economics, university of peshawar
  • Syeda Kaniz Fatima Haider college of home economics, university of peshawar

Abstract

 Background: Amputation is the removal of a limb or part of a limb by a surgical procedure in order to save the life of a person. The underlying reasons behind the occurrence of this tragic incidence may be varied. However, irrespective of its cause limb loss is associated with wide range of life challenges. The study was done to investigate the psychological sequel of an individual after losing a limb and to know the level of strain and pressure they experience after this traumatic event. It also attempts to examine the moderating role of some demographic traits such as age, sex and cause of limb loss in psychosocial adjustment to amputation. Methods: The study includes 100 adult amputees of both genders and the data was collected from major government and private hospitals of Peshawar district. Demographic data sheet was constructed in order to know the demographics traits of amputees and a standardize Psychological Adjustment Scale developed by Sabir (1999) was used to find out the level of psychological adjustment after limb loss. Results: Nearly all the amputees’ exhibit signs of psychological maladjustment at varying degrees. Males showed much greater signs of maladjustment than women and young adults were much psychologically shattered and disturbed as a result of limb loss. Amputation caused by planned medical reasons leads to less adjustment issues as compared to unplanned accidental amputation in which patient were not mentally prepare to accept this loss. Conclusion: Psychological aspect of amputation is an important aspect of limb loss which needs to be addressed properly in order to rehabilitate these patients and helps them to adjust successfully to their limb lossKeywords: Amputation; Psychological aspect; Adjustment; limb loss; demographic traits; anxiety; Stress

Author Biographies

Shaista Ali, college of home economics, university of peshawar

lecturer. department of human development and family studies. college of homeeconomics

Syeda Kaniz Fatima Haider, college of home economics, university of peshawar

professor. department of human development and family studies. college of homeeconomics

References

Soomro N, Bibi R, Ahmed SI, Kamran B, Minhas MA, Siddiqui KY. Epidemiology of amputation; low resource community: Sindh Province, Pakistan. Professional Med J 2013;20(2):261–5.

Mayfield JA, Sugarman JR. The use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and other threshold tests for preventing foot ulceration and amputation in persons with diabetes. J Fam Pract 2000;49(11 Suppl ):S17–29.

De Godoy JM, Braile DM, Buzatto SH, Longo OJ, Fontes OA. Quality of life after amputation. J Psychol Health Med 2004;7(4):397–400.

Williams MR, Ehde MD, Smith GD, Czernieck MJ, Hoffman JA, Robinson R. A two-year longitudinal study of social support following amputation. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(14-15):862–74.

Breakey JW. Body image: The lower limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1997;9(2):58–66.

Gallagher P, Allen D, MacLachlan M. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: a descriptive analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23(12):522–30.

Lai AM, Stanish WD, Stanish HI. The young athlete with physical challenges. Clin Sports Med 2000;9(4):793–819.

Cansever A, Uzun O, Yildiz C, Ates A, Atesalp AS. Depression in men with traumatic, lower part amputation: A comparison to men with surgical lower part amputation. Mil Med 2003;168(2):106–9.

Sabir F. Academic self-concept and achievement among university student as related to their psychological adjustment. Unpublished M.Phil thesis. National Institute of Psychology. Quai-e-Azam University. Islamabad; 1999.

Dunn D. Well-Being Following Amputation: Salutary Effects of Positive Meaning, Optimism, and Control. Rehabil Psychol 1996;41(4):285–302.

Ssbzi Sarvestani A, Taheri Azam A. Amputation: A Ten-Year Survey. Trauma Mon 2013;18(3):126–9.

Horgan O, Maclchlan M. Psychological adjustment to lower-limb amputation:A review. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(14-15):837–50.

Shukla GD, Sahu SC, Tripathi RP, Gupta DK. A psychiatric study of amputees. Br J Psychiatrys 1982;141:50–3.

van der Schans CP, Geertzen JH, Schoppen T, Dijkstra PU. Phantom pain and health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;24(4):429–36.

Washington J. The Relations among Psychological and Demographic Factors in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation. 2013.

Mugo NN. The effects of amputation on Body image and ,well-being - a systematic literature review. Dockside, Cockle Bay Wharf: Sydney; 2010.

Aziz A. Prosthetic problems of transtibial amputee. J Postgrad Med Inst 2011;23(2):153–8.

Crosby l, Miller C. Body image, self‐esteem, and quality of life in older individual with lower limb amputation. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2005;28(3):113–4.

Abou-Zamzam AM Jr, Teruya TH, Killeen JD, Ballard JL. Major lower, extremity amputation in an academic vascular center. Ann Vasc Surg 2003;17(1):86–90.

Jawaid MA, Ali R, Kaimkhani GM, Ghulam MK. Current indications for major lower limb amputations at civil Hospital, Karachi. Pak J Surg 2008;24(4):228–31.

Olasinde AA, Oginni LM, Bankole JO, Adegbehingbe, Oluwadiya KS. Indications for amputations, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Niger J Med 2002;11(3):118–21.

Fisher K, Hanspal RS. Phantom pain, anxiety, depression and their relation in consecutive patients with amputated limbs: Case reports. Br Med J 1998;316(7135):903–4.

Livneh H, Antonak RF, Gerhardt J. Psychosocial adaptation to amputation: The role of socio-demographic variables disability-related factors and coping strategies. Int J Rehabil Res 1999;22(1):21–31.

Williamson GM, Walters AS. Perceived impact of limb amputation on sexual activity. A study of adult amputees. J Sex Res 1996;33(3):221–30.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-08