VAGINAL DELIVERY AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION
AbstractThe trend to deliver with caesarean section has increased in the recent years. The factors affecting thistrend need re-consideration. Most of the women would deliver normally after a trial of labour afterprevious caesarean section. The obstetricians should abide by ethics in clinical practice, carefullyevaluate the indication before every caesarean section, and take an unbiased decision before performinga caesarean section.Trend to deliver with caesarean section (CS) hasincreased recently. The underlying factors are increasedknowledge, availability of facilities and patients’ fear ofvaginal birth. Many women are now opting for acaesarean delivery, even when it is not absolutelyrequired. Moreover, some obstetricians find it easy toperform a CS rather than to wait longer in trial of labour.On the basis of the available evidence the concept of aprophylactic caesarean section being outrageous hasbeen shattered by the fact that almost a third of femaleobstetricians would choose it for themselves.1 Increasedrate of primary caesarean delivery in the United Statesin recent years, and a declining vaginal birth aftercaesarean (VBAC) rate has increased the overall rate ofcaesarean deliveries.2 Recent increases in the proportionof US women with a prior caesarean delivery mean thatan increasing number of women are faced with thechoice and associated risks of either VBAC or repeatcaesarean delivery.3A prior caesarean birth increases the risk ofboth elective and emergency caesarean births anduterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy.4 A trial oflabour after prior caesarean delivery is associated with agreater perinatal risk than is elective repeated caesareandelivery without labour, although absolute risks are low.This information is relevant for counselling womenabout their choices after a caesarean section.5 Womenwith a history of a prior caesarean birth may receiveconflicting information regarding options in futurepregnancies related to the choice of a trial of labour aftera caesarean (TOLAC) or having an elective repeatcaesarean delivery (ERCD).6 Need for induction andaugmentation of labour are both factors associated withan increased likelihood of unsuccessful vaginal birthand risk of uterine rupture.4Trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC)delivery is currently a hot obstetrical topic owing to theacute rise in the rate of caesarean deliveries, bothprimary and repeat.7 Certain labour managementpractices increase the risk for uterine rupture 2–3 times,although the absolute increase is small from a baselineuterine rupture rate.8 After accounting for labourduration, induction is not associated with an increasedrisk of uterine rupture in women undergoing TOLAC.9Ultrasonography can be a useful tool forevaluation of the uterus in planning a normal deliveryafter previous CS. Ultrasound measurements of the CSscar expressed as residual myometrial thickness (RMT)and the change in RMT between the first and the secondtrimester of pregnancy, can accurately predict asuccessful trial of labour in patients with one previousCS.10To meet patient expectations for a safe andsuccessful outcome with a trial of labour after caesareandelivery (TOLAC), specific management plans,checklists, practical coverage arrangements, andsimulation drills are necessary.11The reports Health Committee MaternityServices and Changing Childbirth suggested thatwomen should have a pivotal role in their obstetric care.On the basis of the available evidence the concept of aprophylactic caesarean section being outrageous hasbeen shattered by the fact that almost a third of femaleobstetricians would choose it for themselves.1 A motherto-be must be explained in detail the benefits and risksof a CS before she opts for or is made to accept the CSfor delivery of her child. The obstetrician must neithersimply be a technician to receive dictation from herpatient, nor should be deciding herself alone about themode of delivery. The option of CS should be left onlyfor a really deserving case with genuine reasons for aprimary or a subsequent CS, and not only because of aprevious caesarean section. Excluding a small numberof cases who require an elective CS, labour may safelybe permitted in women who have had one previouscaesarean section, and most will deliver vaginally.12Induction of labour does not increase the riskof repeat caesarean section or uterine rupture. Thoughoxytocin may be administered to augment inefficientlabour, the combined use of oxytocin to acceleratelabour and analgesia significantly increases the risk ofuterine rupture.12Obstetricians should abide by ethics in clinicalpractice and carefully evaluate the indication in everyCS and take an unbiased decision before performing CSon demand/request. Although the debate will continueregarding the appropriateness of CS on demand, anydiscussion of risks and benefits must include theJ Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2012;24(1)2 http://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/24-1/Editorial.pdfpotential for long term risks of repeated CS, includinghysterectomy and maternal and foetal death.13
Paterson-Brown. Should doctors perform an elective
caesarean section on request. BMJ 1998;317(7156):462–3.
MacDorman M, Declercq E, Menacker F. Recent trends and
patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC)
deliveries in the United States. Clin Perinatol
Macdorman MF, Declercq E, Mathews TJ, Stotland N.
Trends and characteristics of home vaginal birth after
cesarean delivery in the United States and selected States.
Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(4):737–44.
Grivell RM, Barreto MP, Dodd JM. The influence of
intrapartum factors on risk of uterine rupture and successful
vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol
Woo GM, Twickler DM, Stettler RW, Erdman WA, Brown
CE. The pelvis after cesarean section and vaginal delivery:
normal MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol
Care for women desiring vaginal birth after cesarean:
American College of Nurse-Midwives. J Midwifery Womens
Clark SM, Carver AR, Hankins GD. Vaginal birth after
cesarean and trial of labor after cesarean: what should we be
recommending relative to maternal risk:benefit? Womens
Health (Lond Engl), 2012;8(4):371–83. doi:
Barger MK, Weiss J, Nannini A, Werler M, Heeren
T, Stubblefield PG. Risk factors for uterine rupture among
women who attempt a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean:
a case-control study. J Reprod Med 2011;56(7–8):313–20.
Harper LM, Cahill AG, Boslaugh S, Odibo AO, Stamilio
DM, Roehl KA, Macones GA. Association of induction of
labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth
after cesarean: a survival analysis. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2012;206(1):51.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.
Epub 2011 Sep 24.
Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Stalder
C, Sayasneh A, et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after
cesarean section using a model based on cesarean scar
features examined using transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 2013. doi: 10.1002/uog.12423. [Epub ahead
Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a commonsense approach. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(2 Pt 1):342–50.
Molloy B, Sheil O, Duignan N. Delivery after caesarean
section: review of 2176 consecutive cases. Br Med J (Clin
Res Ed) 1987;294(6588):1645–7.
Mukherjee SN. Rising cesarean section rate. The Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2006;56(4):298–300.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.