CHOLEDOCHORRAPHY (PRIMARY REPAIR) VERSUS T-TUBE DRAINAGE AFTER OPEN CHOLEDOCHOTOMY
Abstract
Background: T-tube drainage used to be standard practice after surgical choledochotomy, but there isnow a tendency in some canters to close the common bile duct primarily. This study was designed tocompare the clinical results of primary closure with T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy andassess the safety of primary closure for future application. Methods: This study was conducted atsurgical Unit-3, ward 26 Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi, from January 2007 to January2008. Forty patients were included in this study out of which 20 underwent primary closure and 20 Ttube placements. It was Quasi-experimental, non-probability, purposive sampling. Main outcomemeasures were operating time, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. SPSS-10 wasused for data analysis. Results: The age of patients in the study ranged from 29–83 years. There were 3male while 37 female patients. Group-1 consisted of 20 patients underwent primary closure aftercholedocotomy, while Group-2 also consisted of 20 patients underwent T-tube drainage after ductexploration. Mean hospital stay in Group-1 patients was 7.63 days while in group 2 it was 13.6 days.Overall complication rate in group 1 was 15%, biliary leakage in 1 (5%), jaundice in 1 (5%), woundinfection in 1 (5%). No re-exploration was required in Group-1. In Group-2 overall complication ratewas 30%, biliary leakage in 2 (2%), jaundice in 1 (5%), dislodgement of T-tube in 1 (5%), woundinfection in 1 (5%), and sepsis in 1 (5%) patients. Re-exploration was done in one patient. Conclusion:Primary closure of Common Bile Duct (CBD) is a safe and cost-effective alternative procedure toroutine T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy.Keywords: Open choledocotomy, Primary closure, choledocholithiasisReferences
Perez G, Escalona A, Jarufe N, Ibáñez L, Viviani P, García
C, et al. Prospective randomized study of T-tube versus
biliary stent for common bile duct decompression after open
choledochotomy. World J Surg 2005;29:869–72.
Ahrendt SA, Pitt HA, Biliary tract. In: Townsend M, Ed.
Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;
p. 486–92.
Thornton JK. Observation on additional cases illustrating
hepatic Surgery. Lancet 1891;137:763–4.
Halstead WS. Contributions to surgery of the bile passages,
especially of the common bile duct. Bull John Hopkins Hosp
;106:1–11.
Mirrizi PL. Primary suture of the common bile duct in
choledocholithiasis. Arch Surg 1942;44(1):44–54.
Collin PG, Redwood C, Wynne-Jones J. Common bile duct
without intraductal drainage following choledochotomy. Br J
Surg 196;47:661–7.
Sawyer JL, Herrington JL, Edward WH. Primary closure of
the CBD. Am J Surg 1965;109:107–12.
Collin PG. Further experience with common bile duct suture
without intraductal drainage following choledochotomy. Br J
Surg 1967;54:854–6.
Keighley MBR, Burdon DW, Baddeley RM, Dorricott
NJ, Oates GD, Watts GT, et al. Complication of
supraduodenal choledochotomy: a comparison of three
methods of management. Br J Surg 1976;63:754–58.
Vassilakis JS, chattopadhyay DK, Irvin TT, Duthie Hl.
Primary closure of common bile duct after elective
choledochotomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1979;24(3):156–8.
Sorensen VJ, Buck JR, Chung SK, Fath JJ, Horst HM, Obeid
FN. Primary common bile duct closure following exploration
of the common bile duct: an effective alternative to routine
biliary drainage. Am J Surg 1994;60:451–4.
Seale Ak, Ledet WP. Primary common bile duct closure.
Arch Surg 1999;134:22–4.
Sheen-chen SM, Chou FF. Choledochotomy for biliary
lithiasis: is routine T-tube drainage necessary? A prospective
controlled trial. Acta Chir Scand 1990;156:387–90.
De Roover D, Vanderveken M, Gerard Y. Choledochotomy:
primary closure versus T-tube. A prospective trial. Acta Chir
Belg 1989;89:320–24.
William JA, Treacy PJ, Sidey P, Worthley CS, Townsend
NC, Russell EA. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage
following exploration of the common bile duct. Aust NZ J
Surg 1994;64:823–6.
Lygidakis NJ. Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube
drainage or primary closure. Effects on prospective
bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg
;46:254–6.
Gillat DA, May RE, Kennedy R, Longstaff AJ. Complication
of T-tube drainage of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg
;67:370–1.
Gharaibeh KI, Heiss HA, Biliary leakage following T-tube
removal. Int surg 2000;85:57–63.
Rovere J. Bile leakage following T-tube removal. Radiology
;144:267–70.
Kacker LK, Mittal BR, Sikora SS, Ali W, Kapoor
VK, Saxena R, et al. Bile leak after T-tube removal: a
scintigraphy study. Hepatogastroenterology 1995;42:975–8.
JelasoDV, Hirschfield JS. Jaundice from impacted sediment
in a T-tube: recognition and treatment. Am J Roentgenol
;127;413–5.
Haq A, Morris J, Goddard C, Mahmud S, Nassar AH.
Delayed cholangitis resulting from a retained T-tube
fragments encased within a stone: a rare complication. Surg
Endosc 2002;16:714.
Rozario A, Thomas PG, Pais A, Ravindra KV, Rao V
Asymptomatic T-tube remnant in common bile duct. Indian J
Gastroenterol 1999;18:180–1.
Chaudry A, Salunkhe S, Anand BS, Aranya RC. Post
cholecystectomy syndrome due to broken T-tube. Indian J
Gastroenterol 1991;10:18–9.
Lygidakis NJ. Hazards following T-tube removal after
choledochotomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;163:153–5.
Ahmad I, Pradhan C, Beckingham I, brooks J, Rowlands
BJ, Lobo DN. Is a T-tube necessary after common bile duct
exploration? World J Surg 2008;32:1485–8.
Ambreen M, Shaikh AR, Jamal A, Qureshi JN, Dalwani
AG, Memon MM. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage
after open choledochotomy. Asian J Surg 2009;321:21–5.
Zhang LD, Bie P, Wang SG, Ma KS, Dong JH. Primary duct
closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic
choledochotomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2004;42:520–3.
Makinen AM, Matikainen M, Nordback I. T-tube drainage is
needed after routine common bile duct: results of a
randomized trial. Surg Res Commun 1989:6(4):299–302.
Haidar J, Aziz A, Khan l, Alam SN. Primary closure of
common bile duct after open choledochotomy. J Surg Pak
;14(4):173–5.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.