• Gulfreen Waheed
  • Mohammad Amin Mengal
  • Zahra Zafar Sapru
  • Abdul Waheed Sheikh


Background: Autopsies continue to have a multifactorial role in the delivery of modern undergraduatemedical education, despite the radical educational reforms and decline in autopsy rates over the lastdecade. This study was conducted to highlight the usefulness or otherwise of autopsy as a part ofMBBS curriculum from students’ point of view, especially in the backdrop of the controversy amongstthe medical educators on whether Forensics was to be kept as a part of MBBS curriculum. Methods:The study design is descriptive cross-sectional study. All the students of 3rd year MBBS who hadrecently completed their autopsy visits, accompanied by dedicated members of the faculty, were invitedto mark their comments on a especially designed questionnaire with 5 point Likert scale. Theircomments were analysed about how useful and necessary is autopsy is in medical education; theirpersonal distaste for the procedure; staff attitudes; and exploration of alternative teaching methods. Thedata was analysed to determine simple frequency distribution and mode of the students’ responses. Thedifference between male and female students’ responses was calculated by using Chi Square throughcrosstab. All analyses were carried out using SPSS Version 19. Results: The data collated from thequestionnaire showed that, students regard the autopsy as useful in medical education, and alternativeslike videos and printed literature would not be as effective. For some, autopsy was a stressful event andfew actually found it an unpleasant and distasteful experience. Majority students agreed that the attitudeof the teaching staff was supportive of the learning process. Conclusions: It is concluded that teachingbased on autopsy teaches valuable skills, some of which are not easily learnt elsewhere, however, theunpleasant aspects of the autopsy demonstration should be kept to a minimum to encourage attendanceand promote a sense of its value.Keywords: Students, views, autopsy, medical curriculum


Biachat, MFX. Anatomie Generale. In: ER Long (ed). Selected

readings in Pathology. Springfield, Illionios: Charles C Thomas;

Hill RB, Anderson RE. The recent history of the autopsy. Arch

Pathol Lab Med 1996;120:702–12.

Lauder I. Auditing necropsies - learning from surprises.

[Editorial]. BMJ 1991;303:1214–5.

Start RD, McCulloch TA, Benbow EW, Lauder I, Underwood

JC. Clinical necropsy rates during the1980's: the continued

decline. J Pathol 1993;171:63–6.

McKelvie PA, Rode J. Autopsy rate and a clinicopathological

audit in an Australian metropolitan hospital —cause for concern?

Med J Aust 1992;156:456–62.

Anderson NH, Shanks JH, McCluggage GW, Toner PG.

Necropsies in clinical audit. J Clin Pathol 1989;42:897–901.

Burton JL. The autopsy in modern undergraduate medical

education: a qualitative study of uses and curriculum

considerations. Med Educ 2003;37:1073–81.

Loughrey MB, McCluggage WG, Toner PG. The declining

autopsy rate and clinicians’ attitudes. Ulst Med J 2000;69:83–9.

Lundberg GD. Medicine without the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab

Med 1984;108:449–54.

O’Grady G. Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 2003;327:802–3.

Anderson RE, Hill RB. The current status of the autopsy in

academic medical centers in the United States. Am J Clin Pathol


Hill RB, Anderson RE. The uses and value of autopsy in medical

education as seen by pathology educators. Acad Med


Galloway M. The role of the autopsy in medical education. Hosp

Med 1999;60:756–8.

Cameron HM, McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152

hospital autopsies: II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical

diagnoses and their significance. J Pathol 1981;133:285–300.

Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement.

London: Heinemann; 1984.

Benbow EW. Medical students’ views on necropsies. J Clin

Pathol 1990;43:969–76.

Hoda SA, Gerber MA. The value of the autopsy for the 1990s.

Hum Pathol 1990;21:980–1.

Benbow EW. The attitudes of second- and third-year medical

students to the autopsy. A survey by postal questionnaire. Arch

Pathol Lab Med 1991;115:1171–6.

Hoda SA, Horenstein M, Gerber MA. Additional comments on

the value of the autopsy for the 1990s. Hunm Pathol


Sanner MA. Medical students' attitudes toward autopsy. How

does experience with autopsies influence opinion? Arch Pathol

Lab Med 1995;119:851–8.

Conran P, Nowacek G, Adams T, Smith L. Medical students'

attitudes toward the autopsy. Acad Med 1996;71:681–3.

Hill RB, Anderson RE. (editors) The autopsy-Medical practice

and public policy. Boston: Butterworths; 1988.

Charlton R. Autopsy and medical education: a review. J R Soc

Med 1994;87:232–6.

McGoogan E, Cameron HM. Clinical attitudes to the autopsy.

Scott Med J 1978;23:19–22.

Sherwood SJ, Start RD, Birdi KS, Cotton DWK, Bunce D. How

do clinicians learn to request permission for autopsies? Med Educ


Botega NJ, Metze K, Marques E, Cruvinel A, Moraes ZV,

Augusto L, et al. Attitudes of medical students to necropsy. J

Clin Pathol 1997;50:64–6.

D’Souza D. Reduction in the required number of faculty of

forensic medicine in medical colleges of India. Available at:

Sidorov J. An attempt to motivate internal medicine house staff

to obtain consent for autopsies. Acad Med 1990;65:647–9

Anderson RE, Fox RC, Hill RB. Medical uncertainty and the

autopsy: Occult benefits for students. Hum Pathol 1990;21:128–35.

Boers M. The prospects of autopsy: mortuivivosdocuerunt?

(‘Have the dead taught the living?’). Am J Med 1989;86:322–4.