PERCEPTIONS OF MEDICAL TEACHERS ABOUT INTEGRATED CURRICULUM: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
AbstractBackground: Curriculum is a plan of educational experiences and activities offered to a learner. Curricular reform is a dynamic process. To make a curricular change impactful the curriculum needs to be accepted and followed by all stakeholders otherwise it will be unsuccessful. Change is not readily accepted as evidence suggests that there have been frequent curricular reforms but with little change in medical education.Evidence suggests that teachers agree for upgrading themselves towards recent trends in the field of medical education.In light of these facts perceptions of medical teachers of AJK Medical College were evaluated for the purpose of identification of issues and continuation of this process. Methods: Qualitative study design was used. Study setting was AJK Medical College; duration of study was six months from February 1 to July 31 2014. The interviews conducted with the help of a semi structured guide were recorded, and all the recordings were then fully transcribed. Transcripts were read several times by investigators separately to select units of significance and identifying themes. Results: Four themes namely curricular design, integrated curricular implementation, teacher’s issues and student’s issues were identified. Regarding integrated curriculum teachers think that it should be continued in the institution. Teachers believe that proper training is mandatory for the integrated curriculum to be successfully implemented. Conclusion: It is concluded that teachers should be aware of universal practices in medical education, and the curriculum of their university. Teacher’s training is mandatory for implementation and continuation of this curricular reform.Keywords: Integration, curriculum; perceptions; curriculum development; organ-system-based; medical; Teachers; AJK Medical College; thematic analysis; mix-methods research
Harden R. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. Med Teach 2001;23(2):123–37.
Culbert AJ, Blaustein EH, Sandson JI. The modular medical integrated curriculum: an innovation in medical education. N Eng J Med 1982;306(24):1502–4.
Papa FJ, Harasym PH. Medical curriculum reform in North America, 1765 to the present: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Acad Med 1999;74(2):154–64.
Dashputra A, Kulkarani M, Chari S, Manohar T. Perception of medical teachers toward present day medical education. Int J Educ Sci 2012;4(2):91–5.
Ali SK, Baig LA. Problems and issues in implementing innovative curriculum in the developing countries: the Pakistani experience. BMC Med Educ 2012;12(1):31.
Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B. Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach 2013;35(5):381–7.
Bloom SW. Structure and ideology in medical education: an analysis of resistance to change. J Health Soc Behav 1988:29(4):294–306.
Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311(6996):42–5.
Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012; p.555–86.
Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 2004;22(2):63–75.
Huberman M. Teacher careers and school improvement. J Curric Stud 1988;20(2):119–32.
Brown S, McIntyre D. Influences upon teachers’ attitudes to different types of innovation: a study of Scottish Integrated Science. Curric Inq 1982;12(1):35–51.
Richardson V. How and why teachers change. In: Conley SC, Cooper BS, editors. The school as a work environment: Implications for reform. Allyn & Bacon, 1991; p.66–87.
Chan CK, Luk LY. Faculty Perspectives on the “3+3+4” Curriculum Reform in Hong Kong: A Case Study. Int Educ Stud 2013;6(4):56.