EFFECT OF GENDER ON ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH MITRAL STENOSIS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Muhammad Saeed
  • Inam -ul- Haq
  • Muhammad Amer Saleem

Abstract

Background: To assess the gender-based differences in the echocardiographic outcomes of patientswith mitral stenosis presenting at a tertiary care hospital and the clinical implications of suchdifferences. Methods: A total of 90 echocardiographs of both men and women (aged≥15 years) havingmitral valve area (MVA) less than 4 cm2 were assessed. In addition to MVA, pressure half time and leftatrial diameter (LAD) of the patients was also recorded. Other co-existing valvular lesions were alsoassessed in addition to mitral stenosis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS-17. Results: A higherprevalence of mitral stenosis (MS) was found in women than men (76.66% vs 24.44%). Men werehaving more severe mitral stenosis as compared to women (MVA=1.19 cm2 vs 1.32 cm2). This alsoresulted in significantly higher left atrial dilatation in males as compared to women (45.09 vs 41.75,p=0.0422). Most of the patients had other coexisting valvular lesions and isolated MS was rare.However, men had a predominance of aortic stenosis along with mitral stenosis (27% vs 4%, p=0.0059)whereas women had a higher prevalence of mitral regurgitation along with mitral stenosis than the men(65% vs 36%, p=0.0258). Conclusion: There were certain significant differences in echocardiographicoutcomes of patients based upon their gender. A gender-specific management approach towards thepatients with mitral stenosis is essential to have better outcome.Keywords: Mitral stenosis, Rheumatic heart disease, Echocardiography, Gender

References

Turi ZG. Cardiology patient page. Mitral valve disease.

Circulation 2004;109(6):e38–41.

Carabello BA, Crawford FA Jr. Valvular heart disease. N Engl J

Med 1997;337:32–41.

Ates M, Sensoz Y, Abay G, Akcar M. Giant left atrium with

rheumatic mitral stenosis. Tex Heart Inst J 2006;33:389–91.

Hurst JW. Memories of patients with a giant left atrium.

Circulation 2001;104:2630–1.

Chiang CW, Kuo CT, Chen WJ, Lee CB, Hsu TS. Comparisons

between female and male patients with mitral stenosis. Br Heart J

;72(6):567–70.

Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista

A, Griffin BP, et al. Baumgartner H. Echocardiographic

assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for

clinical practice. European Journal of Echocardiography

;10:1–25.

Guilherme L, Cunha-Neto E, Coelho V, Snitcowsky R,

Pomerantzeff PM, Assis RV, et al. Human heart-infiltrating T-cell

clones from rheumatic heart disease patients recognize both

streptococcal and cardiac proteins. Circulation 1995;92(3):415–20.

Agarwal BL. Rheumatic heart disease unabated in developing

countries. Lancet 1981;2:910–1.

Fairweather D, Rose NR. Women and autoimmune diseases.

Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:2005–11.

Health and Vital Statistics 2. Vital Statistics 1990; Department of

Health, the Executive Yuan, Republic of China.

Islam AKMM, Azhar MA, Islam MF, Haque MZ, Yeasmin L. A

Clinical Study on the Pattern of Mitral Valvular Disease in a

Peripheral Tertiary Hospital in Bangladesh. Cardiovascular

journal 2010;3(1):11–21

Plowman SA, Smith DL. Exercise Physiology for Health,

Fitness, and Performance. Philedelphia; Lippincott Williams &

Wilkins: 2007.

Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K,

Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography

in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of

the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods.

Circulation 1988;77:78–85.

Downloads

Published

2011-06-01