REVIEW OF PRESCRIBER APPROACH TOWARDS RATIONAL DRUG PRACTICE IN HOSPITALISED PATIENTS
AbstractBackground: The rational drug prescribing practice is an important health concern around the globethat not only interferes patient’s life but also the socioeconomic issues. Objective: The aim ofcurrent study was to evaluate the rational use of drug, prescribing behaviour of consultant physicians,role of medical team members in irrational therapy and form the basis for providing necessaryinformation to the policy makers. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted involving aset of 340 medication orders containing about 1,755 medications prescribed to patients in DHQTeaching Hospital DI Khan, Pakistan from March to July 2009. The WHO operational package formonitoring and assessing country pharmaceutical situations indicators were used for data collection.Results: Among drugs prescribed per average encounter, 75% were dispensed from hospitalpharmacy. Generally about 22.3% encounters of overdosing, 16.16% drug duplication, 24.25% drugdrug interactions, 3.5% adverse drug effects and 3.8% cases of contraindications were recorded. Theproportion of consultations with antibiotics and injectables prescribed was 80% and 57%respectively. Likewise not less than 70% patients were prescribed NSAIDS, 67% steroids, 55%vitamin supplements, and 34% oral re-hydration solutions. Minimum 5 drugs per prescription wererecorded and 70% of prescriptions were reported with high cost of therapy. Conclusion: The drugpractice among hospitalised patients was clearly irrational accompanied by high levels of medicationerror. An accurate prescribing decision, appropriate treatment, and rational use of drugs are majorneeds of the day to ensure safe medication practice.Keywords: Rational drug use, adverse drug effects, generic drugs, medication profile
Amanda LG, Hans V.H, Flora MHR. Intervention Research in
rational use of drugs: a review. Health Pol Plan 1999;14:89–102.
Alam K, Mishra P, Prabhu M, Shankar PR, Palaian S, Bhandari
RB, et al. Study on rational drug prescribing and dispensing in
outpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Western Nepal.
Kathman Uni Med J 2006;4(4):436–43.
The rational use of drugs: report of the conference of experts.
Nairobi, 25–29 November 1985. Geneva, WHO, 1987.
Pharmacy communication. In: Hassan WE (editor) Hospital
Pharmacy. 5th edition. Phildelpia: Lea and Febiger; 1985.p.154–9.
Puthawala AK, Mansuri SM. Pharmacy practicals for medical
students. 2nd ed. Ahmedabad: 1986.p.13–5.
Paphassarang C, Tomson G, Choprapawon C, Weerasuriya K.
The Lao National Drug Policy: Lessons along the journey.
Ansari KU. Health for all by 2000 AD- Do we achieve it? Ther
Popovich NG. Ambulatory patient care. In: Gennaro AR (editor)
Remington: The science and practice of pharmacy. 19th edition.
Pensylvania: Mack Publishing Company; 1995.p. 1695–719.
Management Sciences for Health. Managing drug supply. West
Hartford, Connecticut, USA: Kumarian Press; 1997.
Quick JD, Hogerzeil HV, Velasquez G, Rago L. Twenty-five
years of essential medicines. Bull WHO 2002;80:913–4.
Victora CG, Facchini LA, Grassi FM. Drug use in southern
Brazilian hospitals. Trop Doct 1982;12:231–5.
Hazra A, Tripathi SK, Alam MS. Prescribing and dispensing
activities at the health facilities of a nongovernmental
organization. Natl Med J India 2000;13(4):177–82.
Flaherty JH, Perry HM, Lynchard GS, Morley JE. Polypharmacy
and hospitalization among older home care patients. J Gerontol A
Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:554–9.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR,
Lawthers AG, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence
in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice
Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370–6.
Ridge KW, Jenkins, DB, Noyce, PR, Barber ND. Medication
errors during hospital drug rounds. Qual Health Care.
Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D,
et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug
events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study
Group. JAMA 2004;274:29–34.
Yoon KL, Sheena D. Reporting of adverse drug reactions in
randomized controlled trials: A systematic survey. BMC Clin
Cooper JW. Reduction of irrational drug duplication in geriatric
nursing homes. Nurs Home Sr Citiz Care 1988;37(1):5–8.
Ayesha DC, Shekhawat B, Amani E, Sunil N. Vinod KD.
Patterns of drug use in the public sector primary health centers of
Bhopal district. Pharm World Sci 2008:30:584–9.
Moghadamnia AA, Mirbolooki MR, Aghili MB. General
practitioner prescribing patterns in Babol City, Islamic Republic
of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 2002;8(4&5):550–5.
Majeed A, Moser K. Age- and sex-specific antibiotic prescribing
patterns in general practice in England and Wales in 1996. Brit J
Gen Pract 1999;49:735–6.
Lindbaek M, Berild D, Straand J, Hjortdahl P. Influence of
prescription patterns in general practice on anti-microbial
resistance in Norway. Brit J Gen Pract 1999;49:436–40.
Visser LE, Bruno H, Stricker C, Graatsma HH. Contraindicated
NSAIDs are frequently prescribed to elderly patients with peptic
ulcer disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002;53:183–8.
William LG, Robert JD, Audrius P. A Trial of Automated
Decision Support Alerts for Contraindicated Medications Using
Computerized Physician Order Entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc
Tamblyn R, Berkson L, Dale Dauphinee W, Gayton D, Roland
G, Huang A, et al. Unnecessary prescribing of NSAIDs and the
management of NSAID-related gastropathy in medical practice.
Ann Intern Med 1997;127:483–5.
Cuninngam CE. Thai ‘injection doctor’, Antibiotic mediators.
Soc Sci Med 1970;4(1):1–24.
Birungi H, Asiimwe D, Reynolds WS. Injection use and practices
in Uganda. DAP Research Series No. 14, Geneva, Action
Programme on Essential Drugs, World Health Organization.
Garner P, Kale R, Dickson R, Dans T, Sakinas R. Implementing
research findings in developing countries. Br Med J
Haaijer RFM, Deining P. New approaches to influencing
physicians drug choices practice based strategy. In: Devis P (ed).
contested Ground. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.