OUTCOME OF THE RUBBER BAND LIGATION WITH MILLIGAN MORGAN HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY

Authors

  • Syed Asad Ali
  • Agha Taj Mohammad
  • Mohammad Jarwar
  • Javeria Imran
  • Akmal Jamal Siddique
  • Abdul Ghafoor Dalwani

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoids is a common anorectal disease seen in our society. Conservativemanagement is usually adopted for 1st and 2nd degree haemorrhoids. Patients who do not respond toabove management are the candidates for other modalities of treatment which includes sclerotherapy,rubber band ligation, cryosurgery and stapler gun or open haemorrhoidectomy. The purpose of studywas to compare the outcome of the Rubber band ligation with Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy inpatients with 2nd and 3rd degree haemorrhoids. Methods: Hundred diagnosed admitted patients ofuncomplicated 2nd and 3rd degree piles were treated either with rubber band ligation (RBL) or openmethod of Milligan Morgan (OH) for the period from January 2007 to December 2007 were includedin the study. Both procedures were evaluated regarding effectiveness, safety, complications afterprocedures, hospital stay and return to work on a written Performa. Patients with 1st and 4th degreehaemorrhoids, below the age of 12 years, bleeding diathesis, associated local anorectal conditionsrequiring surgery, complicated haemorrhoids, recurrent and secondary haemorrhoids were excludedfrom the study. Follow up of all these patients was done in OPD to assess any complication andrecurrence. Data was analysed through SPSS-16.0. Results: One hundred indoor patients with 2nd and3rd degree haemorrhoids were treated either with rubber band ligation or open technique. Most (>90%)of the patients were males. Majority of the patients were in 30–33 years age group. Fresh bleeding(90%) and constipation (45%) were the commonest symptoms followed by prolapsed, discharge andirritation. Second degree was more common than 3rd degree haemorrhoids. Intensive pain was thecommonest complain after both the procedures, however faecal incontinence was not reported in eithergroup. Hospital stay was longer in open technique (70%) compare to few hours to one day in rubberband ligation group. Return to work was earlier in patients treated with rubber band ligation.Conclusion: Rubber band ligation is safe and effective method compare to open technique in 2nd and3rd degree symptomatic haemorrhoids.Keywords: Haemorrhoids, rubber band ligation, Milligan Morgan Procedure, Outcome

References

Bhat SM. Rectum and anal canal. SRB’s manual of surgery.3rd

edition. New Dehli: Jaypee Brother; 2009. p. 888–927.

Tan EK, Cornish J, Darzi AW, Papagrigoriadis S, Tekkis PP.

Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes of randomized controlled

trials of Ligature vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg

;142:1209–8.

William NS, Russell RCG, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK. The

anus and anal canal. In: Bailey & Love Short Practice of Surgery.

th ed. London: 2006;1255–62.

Ohning GV, Machicado GA, Jensen DM. Definitive Therapy for

Internal Hemorrhoids—New Opportunities and Options. Rev

Gastroenterol Disord 2009;9(1):16–26.

Wallis de Vries BM , Van der Beek ES, Wijkerslooth LR, Zwet

WC, Van der Hoeven JA, Schattenkerk M, et al. Treatment of

Grade 2 and 3Hemorrhoids with Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal

Artery Ligation. Dig Surg 2007;24:436–40.

Sandhu PS, Singh K. A randomized comparative study of

micronised flavonoids and rubber band ligation in the treatment

of acute internal haemorrhoids. Indian J Surg 2004;66:281–5.

Acheson AG, Scholefield JH. Management of haemorrhoids.

BMJ 2008;336:380–3.

Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Inceoglu R.

Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective,

randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:70–75.

Johanson JF. Nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids. J

Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:290–4.

Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg

;62:542–52.

Sardinha TC, Corman ML. Hemorrhoids. Surg Clin North Am

;82:1153–67.

Onso-Coello P, Guyatt G, Heels-Ansdell D, Johanson JF,

LopezYarto M, Mills E, et al. Laxatives for the treatment of

hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD004649.

Evans CFM, Hyder SA, Middleton SB. Modern surgical

management of haemorrhoids. Pelviperineology 2008;27:139–42.

Su MY, Chiu CT, Wu CS, Ho YP, Lien JM, Tung SY, et al.

Endoscopic hemorrhoidal ligation of symptomatic internal

hemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:871–4.

MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal

treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum

;38:687–94.

Milligan E, Morgan C. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and

operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:1119–24.

Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon

Rectum 1959;2:176–9.

Majid A, Malik AM, Butt MQ. Hemorrhoids;management by

rubber band ligation. Professional Med J 2006;13:664–8.

Gebbensleben O, Hilger Y , Rohde H. Do we at all need surgery

to treat thrombosed external hemorrhoids? Results of a

prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2009:2 69–74.

Talley NJ. How to Do and Interpret a Rectal Examination in

Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:820–2.

Fraser A. Office proctoscopy and sigmoidoscopy. Australian

family physician 1990; 19(5): 661-3.

Gearhart SL. Symptomatic hemorrhoids. Adv Surg

;38:167–82.

Perez-Miranda M, Gomez-Cedenilla A, Leon-Colombo T,

Pajares J, Mate-Jimenez J.. Effect of fiber supplements on

internal bleeding hemorrhoids. Hepatogastroenterology

;43:1504–7.

Dodi G, Bogoni F, Infantino A, Pianon P, Mortellaro LM, Lise

M. Hot or cold in anal pain? A study of the changes in internal

anal sphincter pressure profiles. Dis Colon Rectum

;29:248–251.

Shafik A. Role of warm-water bath in anorectal conditions. The

thermosphincteric reflex. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993;16:304–8.

Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Micronized purified flavonidic

fraction compared favorably with rubber band ligation and fiber

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(4)

http://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/PAST/22-4/Asad.pdf

alone in the management of bleeding hemorrhoids: randomized

controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:66–69.

Misra MC, Parshad R. Randomized clinical trial of micronized

flavonoids in the early control of bleeding from acute internal

haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2000;87:868–72.

La Torre F, Nicolai AP. Clinical use of micronized purified

flavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after

hemorrhoidectomy: results of a randomized, controlled, clinical

trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:704–10.

Madoff RD, Fleshman JW, Clinical Practice Committee,

American Gastroenterological Association. American

Gastroenterological Association technical review on the

diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids. Gastroenterology

;126:1463–73.

Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p.177–253.

Jr Zollinger RM, Zollinger RM. Open haemorrhoidectomy.

Atlas of surgical operations.17th edi.Mc Graw Hill Inc USA

:174–87.

Tan WTL. Rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Singapore

Med J 1980;21:517–21.

Hashmi F, Siddiqui FG, Jamal A. Role of topical glyceryl

trinitrate as an adjunct following milligan-morgan’s

haemorrhoidectomy. J Surg Pak 2008;13(3):108–11.

Parks AG. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Brit J Surg

;43:337–51.

Holzheimer RG. Hemorrhoidectomy: Indications and risks. Eur J

Med Res 2004:9:18–36.

McArthur DR, Badiani S, Karandikar S. Current Trends in the

Management of Haemorrhoids. Bombay Hospital Journal

;50:343–8.

Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. Stapled

vs Excision Hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:337–40.

Qureshi S, Aziz T, Afzal A, Maher M. Rubber band ligation of

symptomatic Internal haemorrhoids; result of 450 Cases. J Surg

Pak 2009;14(1):19–22.

Lyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Long term outcome of rubber

band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal

hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum2004;47:1364–70.

Cho SW, Lee RA, Chung SS, Kim KH. Early Experience of

Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal

Repair (DG-HAL & RAR) for the Treatment of Symptomatic

Hemorrhoids. J Korean Surg Soc 2010;78:23–8.

Ali U, Samad A. Rubber band ligation versus open

haemorrhoidectomy: A study of 100 cases. J Pakistan Med

Institute. 2005;19:317–22.

Bernal JC, Enquix M, Lopez Garcia J, Garcia Romero J,

Trullenque Peris R. Rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids in a

colorectal unit. A prospective study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig

;97:38–45.

Law WL, Chu KW. Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids:

prospective randomized trial of use of local anesthetic injection.

Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 363–6.

Pokharel N, Chhetri RK, Malla B, Joshi HN, Shrestha RKM.

Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson’s (closed) vs Milligan Morgan’s

technique (open). Nepal Med Coll J 2009;11(2):136–7.

Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB. Anal pressures

in hemorrhoids and anal fissure. Am J Surg 1977; 134:608–10.

Wrobleski DE. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Rhode

Island Med 1995;78:172–3.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)