ASSESSMENT DRIVEN INTEGRATED LEARNING (ADIL): ASSESSMENT DIRECTED MEDICAL EDUCATION (ADME) CURRICULUM
AbstractAssessment has been shown to drive learning. For assessment to drive learning in the right direction,it needs to fulfil certain criteria including reliability, validity, educational impact, feasibility,acceptability to stakeholders, cost-effectiveness etc. Assessment has the greatest effect as a drivingforce in learning if it is authentic, context relevant and samples widely. In this paper, we present anew curriculum design and a model for experiential learning through assessment. We call itAssessment Directed Medical Education (ADME) Curriculum using Assessment Driven IntegratedLearning (ADIL). In this model, we propose a cent percent rightest shift in the curriculum design andlearning strategy by using assessment as the sole tool to a self-directed learning process throughsupervised simulated and real-patient encounters testing competencies in cognitive, psychomotor andaffective domains in an integrated approach utilising key resources for active learning. It is presumedthat, this will, in the long term improve health care delivery by producing competent healthcareprofessionals that have learned through direct student-‘patient’ encounters from day one of theirmedical education and are competent in making professional judgments, exhibit appropriate skillsand behaviours.Keywords: Assessment, Learning technique, CME, Curriculum, Evaluation, Competency based
Van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional
competence: developments, research and practical implications.
Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1(1):41–67.
Gibbs G, Simpson C. How Assessment Influences Student
Learning – a Conceptual Overview. Centre for Higher Educ Prac;
McLachlan JC. The relationship between assessment and learning.
Med Educ 2006;40:716–7.
Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking
memory tests improves longterm retention. Psychol Sci
Woollard M, Whitfield R, Newcombe RG, Colquhoun M, Vetter
N, Chamberlain D. Optimal refresher training intervals for AED
and CPR skills: a randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(4)
Wheeler MA, Ewers M, Buonanno JF. Different rates of
forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory
Downing SM. The metric of medical education. Validity: on the
meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ
Arthur W Jr. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a
quantitative review and analysis. Hum Perform 1998;11:57–102.
Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1:
The cognitive domain. New York. David McKay Co Inc. 1956.
Druckman D, Bjork RA. Optimising longterm retention and
transfer. In the Mind’s Eye: Enhancing Human Perform. National
Academy Press; 1991. p. 23–56.
Berden H, Willems F, Hendrick J, Knape J. How frequently
should basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training be repeated to
maintain adequate skills? BMJ 1993;306:1576–7.
Kuo TM, Hirshman E. Investigations of the testing effect. Am J
Karpicke JD, Roediger HL. Repeated retrieval during learning is
the key to enhancing later retention. J Mem Lang 2007;57:151–62.
Carpenter SK, DeLosh EL. Impoverished cue support enhances
subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval
explanation of the testing effect. Mem Cognit 2006;34:268–76.
van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth WT, Lambert. Assessing
professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med
Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL. Performance-based
assessment: lessons from the health professions. Educ Res
Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability
validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient
management problem item formats in assessment of clinical
competence. Med Educ 1985;19:238–47.
Rethans JJ, Norcini JJ, Baron-Maldonado M, Blackmore D, Jolly
BC, LaDuca T, et al. The relationship between competence and
performance: implications for assessing practice performance.
Med Educ. 1985;36(10): 901–9.
Smith SR, Dollase RH, Boss JA. Assessing students’ performance
in a competency-based curriculum. Acad Med 2003;78:97–107.
Williams, RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and
environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.
Teach Learn Med 2003;15:270–92.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills⁄competence⁄
performance. Acad Med 1990;65(9):63–7.
van der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, de Graaff E. Pitfalls in the
pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ
Epstein RM. Comprehensive Assessment Manual. New York:
Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals.
Med Educ 2002;36:800–4.
Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional
competence. JAMA 2002;287:226–35.
Turnbull J, van Barneveld C. Assessment of clinical performance:
In-training evaluation. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM,
Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical
Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers;
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese
RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that
lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach
Rosenbaum DA, Carlson RA, Gilmore RO. Acquisition of
intellectual and perceptual motor skills. Annu Rev Psychol
Wass V, Jones R, van der Vleuten C. Standardized or real patients
to test clinical competence? The long case revisited. Med Educ
Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik J. Effects of frequent classroom
testing. J Educ Res 1991;85(2):89–99.
Kromann BC, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on
skills learning. Med Educ 2009;43:21–7.
Schoonheim-Klein ME, Habets L, Aartman IHA, van der Vleuten
CP, Hoogstraten J, van der Velden, U. Implementing an objective
structured clinical examination (OSCE) in dental education:
effects on students’ learning strategies. Eur J Dent Educ
Coles C. Developing professional judgment. J Contin Educ Health
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation
technology for health care professional skills training and
assessment. JAMA 1999;282:861–6.
Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic
research and implications for educational practice. Perspect
Psychol Sci 2006;1:181–276.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.