COMPARISON OF PENCIL BEAM AND COLLAPSED CONE ALGORITHMS, IN RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING FOR 6 AND 10 MV PHOTON
AbstractBackground: In radiotherapy treatment, the calculation of radiation dose distribution in target volumelead to an optimum set of planning parameters. This worked has been aimed to compare two photonbeam dose calculation algorithms in the Oncentra Treatment Planning system for Varian LinearAccelerator, to assure the quality of treatment planning. Methods: Monitor Units to be delivered onnormalization depth in patient has been calculated using the pencil beam and collapsed cone algorithmsfor two photon energies 6 and 10 MV. The percentage depth dose and beam profiles for 21 treatmentfields, for both the calculation systems have been compared for both photon energies. Results: Thepercentage depth doses and beam profiles for both calculation systems are comparable in large fieldsizes as well as central axis field settings. The doses at normalization depth deviate for some fieldsettings, but in central axis large field sizes the difference in within tolerance limits. Conclusion: Bothcalculation algorithms are in close agreement in most of the field settings (mainly in central axis fields),within tolerance level. The difference is relatively greater in small field sizes and off-axis field settings.Keywords: Radiotherapy, treatment planning, dose distribution, pencil beam, collapsed cone
Podgorsak EB. Radiation Oncology Physics: a handbook for
teachers and students. Vienna: IAEA; 2005.
Mohan R, Chui C, Lidofsky L. Differential pencil beam dose
computation model for photons calculations. Med Phys
Murray DC, Hoban PW, Metcalfe PE, Round WH. 3-D
superposition for radiotherapy treatment planning using fast
Fourier transforms. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 1989;12:128–37.
Boyer AL, Zhu YP, Wang L, Francois P. Fast Fourier transform
convolution calculations of x-ray dose distributions in
homogeneous media. Med Phys 1989;16:248–53.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(3)
Ahnesjo A, Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for
photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Med. Phys
Metcalfe PE, Hoban PW, Murray DC, Round WH. Beam
Hardening of 10 MV radiotherapy x-rays: Analysis using a
convolution/superposition method. Phys Med Biol
Traberg Hansen A, Petersen JB, Høyer M, Christensen JJ.
Comparison of two dose calculation methods applied to
extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning.
Radiother Oncol 2005;77(1):96–8.
Nisbet A, Beange I, Vollmar HS, Irvine C, Morgan A, Thwaites
DI. Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone
algorithm in simulated clinical situations. Radiother Oncol
Hasenbalg F, Neuenschwander H, Mini R, Born EJ. Collapsed
cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose
calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in
clinical cases. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:3679–91.
Dobler B, Walter C, Knopf A, Fabri D, Loeschel R, Polednik M,
et al. Optimization of extracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
of small lung lesions using accurate dose calculation algorithms.
Radiat Oncol 2006;1:45.
Carlsson Tedgren A, Ahnesjo A, Optimization of the
computational efficiency of a 3D, collapsed cone dose calculation
algorithm for brachytherapy. Med Phys 2008;35:1611–8.
Treutwein M, Bogner L, Electron fields in clinical application. A
comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm.
Strahlenther Onkol 2007;183:454–8.