LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: AN EXPERIENCE AT LADY READING HOSPITAL, PESHAWAR
AbstractBackground: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy originally a minimal invasive surgical techniqueinvolving less hospital stay less economical burden decreased post op complication and early mobility.The objective was to analyse data of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a surgicalsetup. Methods: This study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital,Peshawar from 11th January 2006 till 10th January 2009. Patients aged above 14 year, presenting in theoutpatient department with clinical and ultrasonographic evidence of cholecystitis and undergoinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. The procedure performed was predominantlythe four port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A proforma was prepared to collectpreoperative, operative, and postoperative data. Operative data included the technique used and thedifficulties ascertained during those procedures. Data was analysed using SPSS-13.0. Results: Of 421patients, 387 patients fulfilled the criteria for admission to undergo the procedure. The mean age of allpatients was 38.6±7.1 year ranging from 16 years to 72 year with a male to female ratio of 1:8.09.During the first six months 57 patients underwent the procedure for which the mean operating time was67.4 min. During the last six months the mean operating time was 39.1±8.9 minutes. The overall rate ofconversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 6.4%. In comparison the last six months of the studyshowed one case (1.16%) in 86 patients being converted to open cholecystectomy. The most commoncause foe conversion of the laparoscopic procedure to an open cholecystectomy was dense adhesionsmaking dissection of the triangle of Calot’s difficult. In 73 cases (21.4%) the gall bladder wasperforated during dissection of gall bladder from the gall bladder bed. Conclusion: The out comes ofthis study during the last six months is comparable to studies conducted at more experienced centresmaking laparoscopic more than just an early experience in this part of the world.Keywords: Laparoscopic, Cholecystectomy, Complications, Cholecystitis
Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H. Coelioscopic
cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg
Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: a
comparison with minilap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc
Hannan EL, Imperato PJ, Nemer RP, Starr H. Laparoscopic
and open cholecystectomy in New York State. Mortality,
complications and choice of procedure. Surgery
The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518
laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Eng J Med 1991;324:1073–8.
Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones RS.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for
symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg 1991;213:665–77.
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Gallstones and
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Gallstones and laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. JAMA 1993;269:1018–24.
Hugo WT, James M. Principles and present status of
laparoscopic general surgery. Surg Int 1997;37:73–5.
Testas P, Dewatteville JC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann
Gastroenterol Hepatol 1993;29:300–3.
Suter M, Meyer A. A 10-year experience with the use of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe?
Surg Endosc 2001;15:1187–92.
Lekawa M, Shapiro SJ, Gordon LA, Rothbart J, Hiatt JR. The
laparoscopic learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:455–8.
Dashow L, Friedman I, Kempner R, Rudick J, McSherry C.
Initial experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Beth
Israel Medical Center. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:25–30.
Gadacz TR, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1990;70:1249–62.
Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess
G, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991;161:385–7.
Cameron JC, Gadacz TR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
(editorial). Ann Surg 1991;214:251.
Wilson RG, Macintyre IMC, Nixon SJ, Saunders JH, Varma JS,
King PM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective
treatment for severe acute chlecystitis. BMJ 1992;305:394–6.
Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw A. Factors associated with
successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Ann Surg 1993;217:233–6.
Wiesen SM, Unger SW, Barkin JS, Edelman DS, Scott JS, Unger
HM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for
acute cholecystitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:334–7
Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Graham SM, Buell J,
Imbembo AL. Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis.
Am J Surg 1993;165:508–14.
Suhocki PV, Meyers WC. Injury to aberrant bile ducts during
cholecystectomy: a common cause of diagnostic error and
treatment delay. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:955–9.
Mohammad S, Hinduja T, Fatima S. Complications of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. J Surg Pak
Walker AT, Shapiro AW, Brooks DC, Braver JM, Tumeh SS.
Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: imaging evaluation. Am J Roentgenol
Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano
JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A
prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg
Peters JH, Ollila D, Nichols KE, Gibbons GD, Davanzo
MA, Miller J, et al. Diagnosis and management of bile leaks
following laparoscopic eholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc
Tarcoveanu E, Nicculesce D, Georgescu S, Bradea C, Epure O.
Conversion in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirugia
Ishiazaki Y, Miwa K, Yoshimoto J, Sugo H, Kawasaki S.
Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy between
and 2004. Br J Surg 2006;93:987–91.
Iqbal J, Ahmed B, Iqbal Q. Rashid A. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy, morbidity
comparison. Professional Med J 2002;9:226–35.
Roviaro GC, Macioco M, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani V,
Rabughino G, et al. Complications following cholecystectomy. J
R Coll Surg Edinb 1997;42:324–8.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(2)
Raza M, Wasty WH, Habib L, Farhat J, Saria MS, Sarwar M. An
audit of Cholecystectomy. Pak J Surg 2006;23(2):100–3.
Bhopal FG, Rai MA, Iqbal MA. A comparative study of
morbidity in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Surg Pak
Cheema MA, Munir A, Zahid MA, An experience of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Lahore General Hospital.
Elder S, Qunin J, Chourih, Sabo E, Matter I, Nashe E, Schein M.
Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching services: A
prospective trial. Surg Lap Endosc 1996;6(3):218–20.
Jaffary SA, Shamim MS, Raza SJ, Dastagir A. Instrument
failure; a preventable cause of conversion in laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Pak J Surg 2006;23(2):92–5.
Mufti TS, Ahmad S, Naveed D, Akbar M, Zafar A. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: an early experience at Ayub Teaching Hospital
Abbottabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2007;19:42–4.
Abbassi SA, Azami R Haleem A, Tariq GR, Iqbal A, Almas D,
et al. An audit of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed at
PNS Shifa. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2003;53(1):51–8.
Tayab M, Ahsan RS, Khan MR, Azami R. Conversion from
laproscopic to open cholecystectomy. Multivariant analysis of
preoperative risk factors. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:17–20.
Singh K, Ohri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy –is there a need
to convert? J Min Acces Surg 2005;1:59–62.
Arain GM, Hassan A, Randhawa MH, Malik SA. Laparoscopic
Cholecystectomy and its complications: a study of 1100 cases.
Pak J Gastroentrol 1998;12(1-2):29–35.
Z’graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber
C. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in
Switzerland: a prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Swiss
Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Surg
McDonald MP, Munson JL, Sanders L, Tsao J, Buyske J.
Consequence of lost gallstone. Surg Endosc 1997;11:774–7.
MacFayden BV Jr, Vennichio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR. Bile
duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United
States experience. Surg Endosc 1998;12:315–21.
Anwar S, Rahim R, Agwunobi A, Bancewicz J. The role of
ERCP in management of retained bile duct stones after
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J N Z Med Assoc
;117(1203):U1102. Available at: http://www.nzma.org.nz/
Rogers AL, Fraha GJ, Beamer RL, Chang FC. Incidence and
associated mortality of retained common bile duct stones. Am J
Shaw MJ, Mackie RD, Moore JP, Dorsher PJ, Freeman
ML, Meier PB, et al. Results of a multicenter trial using a
mechanical lithotripter for the treatment of large common bile
duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:730–3.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.