ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY VERSUS CORE BIOPSY IN THE PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF NON-PALPABLE BREAST LESIONS
AbstractBackground: Breast screening is a method of detecting breast cancer at a very early stage. Most of thelesions detected by screening are not malignant. Objective of this study was to compare ultrasoundguided fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of non-palpablebreast lesions. Methods: The study was conducted prospectively at Department of Radiology, ShaukatKhanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Pakistan from March 2004 to February 2005.All the patients underwent fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy. Later on, all of them hadexcision biopsy/ mastectomy. Prospectively 80 patients were studied; information was collected on aspecifically designed form according to inclusion criteria. The patient age, sex, medical record numberand side of lesion were recorded. Clinical history of duration of lump was also taken. Informed consentwas obtained. Results: The age of patients were ranges from 20–71 years, with mean of 44.31±11.002and the maximum number of patients 28 (35.3%) was between the ages 50–59 years. The sensitivity ofFNAC was 92.85%, while the specificity of was 90% and the accuracy rate was 92.1%. The sensitivityof core biopsy was 94.64%, specificity 91.30% and accuracy rate was 94.87%. Conclusion: FineNeedle Aspiration has been found to be an extremely useful method for the diagnosis of lumps ofbreast. The accuracy and the sensitivity of diagnosis on fine needle aspiration cytology were high.Keywords: fine needle biopsy, core biopsy, ultrasound guided, non-palpable breast cancer, breast lesion
Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ, Gierson
ED, Rosser RJ, Handel N, et al. Nonpalpable breast
lesions: diagnosis with slightly overpenetrated screen-film
mammography and hook wire-directed biopsy in 1014 cases.
Alexander HR, Candela FC, Dershaw DD, Kinne DW.
Needle-localized mammographic lesions: results and
evolving treatment strategy. Arch Surg 1990;125:1441–4.
Layfield LJ, Parkinson B, Wong J, Giuliani AE, Basset LW.
Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of
nonpalpable breast lesions Can it replace open biopsy?
Thompson WR, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, Pricolo VE,
Shahinian TK, Soderberg CH. Mammographic localization
and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Surg
Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg
WA, Connolly J, et al. Stereotactic and sonographic largecore biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Acad Radiol
Apestegu´a L, Pina L, Inchusta M, Mellado M, Franquet
T, De Miguel C, et al. Nonpalpable, well-defined, probably
benign breast nodule: management by fine-needle aspiration
biopsy and long-interval follow-up mammography. Eur
Thurfjell E. Mammographically-guided fine needle aspiration
in differential diagnosis of cystic versus solid rounded
masses smaller than 2 cm detected at mammographic
screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;75:221–6.
Frable WJ. Thin needle aspiration biopsy. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders Co; 1983. p.1–71.
Pennes DR, Naylor B, Rebner M. Fine needle aspiration
biopsy of the breast. Influence of the number of passes and
the sample size on the diagnostic yield. Acta Cytologica
Bibbo M. Scheiber M, Cajulis R, Keebler CM, Wied
GL, Dowlatshahi K. Stereotaxic fine needle aspiration
cytology of clinically occult malignant and premalignant
breast lesions. Acta Cytol 1988;32:193–201.
Das DK, Sodhani P, Kashyap V, Parkash S, Pant
JN, Bhatnagar P. Inflammatory Lesions of the Breast:
Diagnosis by Fine Needle Aspiration. Cytopathology
Dejmek A, Lindholm K. Frequency of Cytologic features in
fine needle aspirates from histologically and cytologically
diagnosed fibroadenomas. Acta Cytol 1991;35:695–9.
Bottles K, Chan JS, Holly EA, Chiu SH, Miller TR.
Cytology criteria for fibroadenoma: A step-wise logistic
regression analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 1988;89:707–9.
Bright RA, Morrison AS, Brisson J. Burstein
NA, Sadowsky NL, Kopans DB, et al. Histologic and
mammographic specificity of risk factors for benign breast
disease. Cancer 1989;64:653–7.
Garre Sánchez MC, Sola Pérez J, Bas Bernal
A, Mercader Martínez J, López Alanis A. Ultrasound
guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Study of the cost per
patient and comparison with computed tomograpgy guided
biopsy. Rev ESP Enferm Diag 1997;89:297–304.
Collacol M, deLima RS, Werner B, Torres IFB. Value of fine
needle aspiration in the diag of breast lesions. Acta Cyto
Alderson MR, Hamlin I, Staunton MD. The relative
significance of prognostic factors in breast carcinomas. Br J
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(2)
Howat AJ, Hoda RS. Correspondence. Why pathologists
should take needle aspiration specimens. Cytopathology
Wells CA, Ellis I. O, Zakhour HD, Wilson AR. Cytology
subgroup of the national coordinating committee for breast
cancer screening pathology. Guidelines for cytology
procedures and reporting of fine needle aspirates of the
breast. Cytopathology 1994;5;316–34.
Abele AS, Miller TR, Goodson WH 3rd, Hunt TK, Hohn
DC. Fine needle aspiration of palpable breast masses: A
Program for staged implementation. Arch Surg
Rimm DL, Stastny J, Rimm EB, Ayer S, Frable WJ.
Comparison of the costs of fine needle aspiration and open
surgical biopsy as methods for obtaining a pathological
diagnosis. Cancer 1997;81:51–6.
Adye B, Jolly PC, Bauermeister DE. The role of fine-needle
aspiration in the management of solid breast masses. Arch
Dixon JM, Clarke PJ, Crucioli Vl. Dehn TC, Lee
EC, Greenall MJ. Reduction of the surgical excision rate in
bening breast disease using fine needle aspiration cytology
with immediate reporting. Br J Surg 1987;74:1014–6.
Quershi N, Usman N. Comparison of fine needle aspiration
cytology with histology in palpable breast lesions. Biomedica
Bodó M, Döbrössy L, Sugár I, Boeck’s sarcoidosis of the
Breast: Cytologic findings with aspiration biopsy cytology: a
case clinically mimicking carcinoma: Acta Cytol 1978;22:1–2.
National Health System Breast Screening program.
Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting in breast
cancer screening. Sheffield: NHSBSP publication; 1993.
Hirst C, Davis N. Core biopsy for microcalcification in the
breast. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67:320–4.
Schimazu K, Masana N, Yamada T, Okamoto K, Kanda K.
Cytologic evaluation of phylloides tumour as compared to
fiberadenoma of breast. Acta Cytol 1994;38:891–7.
Lifrange E, Kaidelka F, Collin C. Stereotaxic needle-core
biopsy and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of
nonpalpable breast lesions: controversies and future
prospects. Eur J Radiol 1997;24:39–47.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.