EFFECTIVENESS OF PLAIN SHOULDER RADIOGRAPH IN DETECTING DEGENERATE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS

Authors

  • Adnan Hussain Hinchingbrooke Hospital huntingdon, UNITED KINGDOM
  • Muhammad Muzzammil jinnah postgraduate medical center
  • Faisal Butt
  • Epaminondas Markos Valsamis
  • Amitabh J. Dwyer

Abstract

Background: Studies have demonstrated radiographic findings of sclerosis and cortical irregularity at the greater tuberosity can suggest a rotator cuff tear. Plain radiographs are the most easily attainable first-line investigations in evaluating shoulder injuries. This study determines the effectiveness in predicting degenerate rotator cuff tears by detecting radiographic changes on shoulder x-rays. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study with a consecutive series of patients conducted in Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, United Kingdom from January 2015 to June 2017. Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 150 symptomatic patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy were independently analysed by surgeons who were blinded from the arthroscopic results. Patients aged under 30 and over 70 years were excluded. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy evident on x-rays were also excluded. Sixty-five patients included in the study had rotator cuff tears on arthroscopy. Radiographic changes were correlated with arthroscopic findings to determine this test's ability to predict degenerate rotator cuff tears. Results: When both cortical irregularity and sclerosis were present on the plain radiograph, these signs had a sensitivity of 78.8% [95% CI 65.7, 87.8%] and specificity 77.4% [95% CI 67.2, 85.0%] with a positive predictive value of 68.3%, using contingency table analysis. The presence of cortical irregularity was found to be a better predictor of a tear as compared to sclerosis. Conclusions: This study concludes that plain radiograph are good modality for initial evaluation of rotator cuff tears and detecting when both cortical irregularity and sclerosis. Consideration of these radiographic findings serves as a useful adjunct in diagnostic workup and can guide subsequent investigations and treatment when evaluating rotator cuff tears of the shoulderKeywords: Effectiveness; Plain Radiograph; Shoulder; Degenerate; Rotator Cuff Tears

References

Crusher RH. Rotator cuff injuries. Accid Emerg Nurs 2000;8(3):129–33.

Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. Shoulder sonography: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37(4):767–85.

Seibold CJ, Mallisee TA, Erickson SJ, Bonton MD, Raasch WG, Timins ME. Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging. Radiographics 1999;19(3):685–705.

Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(1):10–5.

Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O, Evanoff BA, Teefey SA, Middleton WD. Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: A longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10(3):199–203.

Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, et al. Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(16):2623–33.

Kim HM, Dahiya N, Teefey SA, Keener JD, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. Relationship of tear size and location to fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(4):829–39.

Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(29):1–166.

Murrell GA, Walton JR. Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Lancet 2001;357(9258):769–70.

Jensen KL, Williams GR Jr, Russell IJ, Rockwood CA Jr Rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(9):1312–24.

Pearsall AW, Bonsell S, Heitman RJ, Helms CA, Osbahr D, Speer KP. Radiographic findings associated with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. J shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12(2):122–7.

Wohlwend JR, Van Holsbeeck M, Craig J, Shirazi K, Habra G, Jacobsen G, et al. The association between irregular greater tuberosities and rotator cuff tears: A sonographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(1):229–33.

Koh KH, Han KY, Yoon YC, Lee SW, Yoo JC. True anteroposterior (Grashey) view as a screening radiograph for further imaging study in rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22(7):901–7.

de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1701–7.

Moosikasuwan JB, Miller TT, Burke BJ. Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings. Radiographics 2005;25(6):1591–607.

Somerville LE, Willits K, Johnson AM, Litchfield R, LeBel ME, Moro J, et al. Clinical Assessment of Physical Examination Maneuvers for Rotator Cuff Lesions. Am J Sports Med 2014;42(8):1911–9.

Gismervik SØ, Drogset JO, Granviken F, Rø M, Leivseth G. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1):41.

Oh, EH, Imanaka, Y, and Evans, E. Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 2005;21(1):73–80.

Fongemie AE, Buss DD, Rolnick SJ. Management of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. Am Fam Physician 1998;57(4):667–74, 680–2.

Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ, Adkins MC, Emery RL, Jones TP, et al. Association of Biceps Tendon Tears with Rotator Cuff Abnormalities: Degree of Correlation with Tears of the Anterior and Superior Portions of the Rotator Cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(3):633–9.

Lo IK, Parten PM, Burkhart SS. Combined subcoracoid and subacromial impingement in association with anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: an arthroscopic approach. Arthroscopy 2003;19(10):1068–78.

Published

2018-01-04

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.