MEASURE OF FREQUENCY OF ALVEOLAR OSTEITIS USING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF OSTEOTOMY IN MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR IMPACTIONS: A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Authors

  • Hina Rashid DOW UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Azmina Hussain
  • Abdul Hafeez Sheikh
  • Kehkishan Azam
  • Sofia Malik
  • Muhammad Amin

Abstract

Background: Dento-alveolar surgical procedures involving third molar teeth are the most common surgical procedure in the field of surgery. The objective of this research was to analyse the impact of surgery on the incidence of alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of mandibular third molar and to compare two different bone cutting methods following impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Methods: This double blinded randomized clinical trial was executed at the OPD of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi. The study duration was four months. It was conducted on 60 patients needing unilateral mandibular third molar impaction removal. Patients were randomized to two groups (i.e., physio dispenser group and slow speed handpiece group) before surgery. The surgical procedure was performed under local anaesthesia by using standardized cross infection protocol. The frequency of alveolar osteitis was evaluated on third-day postoperatively. Alveolar osteitis was diagnosed and confirmed by patient’s history and clinical evaluation. Post-operative sequelae were observed and recorded objectively. Results: Out of 60 patients’, five patients experienced alveolar osteitis, and the incidence rate was 8.3%. A significant p-value of 0.000 was calculated using binomial test for comparison of alveolar osteitis among both groups. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed by kappa and good (62%) agreement, which was found among the examiners, who diagnosed alveolar osteitis clinically. Post-operative sequelae were insignificant in slow speed hand piece group. Conclusion: It was observed that alveolar osteitis was reported in physio-dispenser group; similarly, post-operative complications were also more in this group as compared with slow speed-hand piece group. No surgical complications were observed in slow speed-hand piece group suggesting slow speed hand piece mode of osteotomy to be safer for third molar extraction as compared with physio-dispenser.Keywords: Alveolar Osteitis; bone cutting; mandibular third molar surgery

References

Bello SA, Adeyemo WL, Bamgbose BO, Obi EV, Adeyinka AA. Effect of age, impaction types and operative time on inflammatory tissue reactions following lower third molar surgery. Head Face Med 2011;7(1):8.

Karnure MH, Munot N. Review on conventional and novel techniques for treatment of alveolar osteitis. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2013;6(3):13–7.

Caso A, Hung LK, Beirne OR. Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99(2):155–9.

Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, et al. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50(6):556–61.

Azam K, Hussain A, Maqsood A, Faroowui WA. Effects of surgery duration on post-extraction sequelae following impacted third molar surgery by using two different bone cutting methods; a double blind randomized trial. Pak Oral Dent J 2016;36(1):8–12.

Freudlsperger C, Deiss T, Bodem J, Engel M, Hoffmann J. Influence of lower third molar anatomic position on postoperative inflammatory complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70(6):1280–5.

Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4(2):e1.

Tarakji B, Saleh LA, Umair A, Azzeghaiby SN, Hanouneh S. Systemic review of dry socket: aetiology, treatment, and prevention. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(4):ZE10–3.

Almeida LE, Pierce S, Klar K, Sheman K. Effects of oral contraceptives on the prevalence of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45(10):1299–1302.

Bali A, Bali D, Sharma A, Verma G. Is pederson index a true predictive difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery? A meta-analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2013;12(3):359–64.

Balaji SM. Impacted third molars in sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism and micrognathia. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2014;4(1):39–44.

Elo JA, Sun HH, Dong F, Tandon T, Singh HM. Novel incision design and primary flap closure reduces the incidence of alveolar osteitis and infection in impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;122(2):124–33.

Osunde OD, Saheeb BD. Effect of age, sex and level of surgical difficulty on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2015;14(1):7–12.

Kolokythas A, Olech E, Miloro M. Alveolar osteitis: a comprehensive review of concepts and controversies. Int J Dent 2010;2010:249073.

öZveri Koyuncu B, ZeytinoğLu M, çEtingüL E. Comparison of 2 different flap techniques in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Turk J Med Sci 2013;43:891–8.

Bloomer CR. Alveolar osteitis prevention by immediate placement of medicated packing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90(3):282–4.

Haraji A, Motamedi MJ, Rezvani F. Can flap design influence the incidence of alveolar osteitis following removal of impacted mandibular third molars? Gen Dent 2010;58(5):e187–9.

Singh V, Alex K, Pradhan R, Mohammad S, Singh N. Techniques in the removal of impacted mandibular third molar: A comparative study. Eur J Gen Dent 2013;2(1):25–30.

Tolstunov L. Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report. Br Dent J 2012;213(12):597–601.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-15

Most read articles by the same author(s)