COMPARISON OF PHOTOMETRIC CYANMETHEMOGLOBIN AND AUTOMATED METHODS FOR HEMOGLOBIN ESTIMATION

Authors

  • Waqar Azim
  • Shahida Parveen
  • Saadat Parveen

Abstract

Background: Hemoglobin estimation is the most frequent laboratory investigation requested. Different methods include acid haematin, photometric cyanmethemoglobin estimation and automated estimation with the help of counters. Aims and objectives of the current study were to compare photometric cyanmethemoglobin method with hemoglobin estimation by Medonic automated counter. Methods: One hundred and ten adult cases were included through convenience sampling. Samples with hemolysis were excluded from the study. Blood was drawn in CP bottles. Sample was thoroughly mixed and hemoglobin estimation was done by Medonic counter as well by photometer 4010. Commercial controls were run with each batch. Results: By manual methods, results revealed mean 0.85% increase compared to automated counter. Commercial control results showed 2.3% and 2.7% coefficient of variation by Medonic counter and photometer 4010 respectively. Conclusions: It was concluded that both methods are accurate and precise, with reference range 2.61% more in manual method. It is recommended that with small samples and with parameters like hemoglobin or hemoglobin with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, manual method is cost effective and feasible. However with multiple parameters like absolute values and with very large batches, like in tertiary laboratory, automated method is time effective and feasible, provided the laboratory can bear the cost.Key Words: Hemoglobin estimation, Cell counter, Cyanmethemoglobin.

References

Dessparis EN. Erythropoiesis. In: Foester J, Paraskevas F, Grear JP, Rodgers GM, eds. Wintrobes clinical hematology. Williams Wilkins, Baltimore 1999; 169-227.

Wyne HE, Munawar F. Hemoglobin levels in day scholars and boarders of Fatima Jinnah Medical College. Pakistan J M Res 1997; 36(3): 113-4.

Fainbanks VF, Klee GG. Biochemical aspects of hematology. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Teitz textbook of clinical chemistry. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia 1999; 1673-75.

Bain BJ, Bates I. Basic hematological techniques. In: Lewis SM, Bain BJ, Bates I, eds. Dacie & Lewis Practical hematology. Churchil Livingstone, Edinburg 2001; 19-46.

Daniel HR. Examination of blood. In: Beutler E, Lichtman MA, Coller BS, Kipps TJ, Seligsolin URI, eds. Williams Hematology sixth edition. McGraw Hill Medical Publishing Division 2001; 9-16.

Qureshi HJ. Comparative study of Sahli’s and Cyanmethemoglobin methods of hemoglobin estimation. Pakistan J Med Res 1999; 38(4): 149-50.

Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory Practice in tropical countries. Cambridge University Press 2000; 267-347.

Hematology section 2. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Laboratory Accreditation Program checklists, 2000

Ward KM, Lehman CA, Leiken AM. Clinical laboratory instrumentation and automation: Principles, application and selection. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 1994.

Lyod PH. A scheme for evaluation of diagnostic kits. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 1978; 15: 136-45.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 3 (2002): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.