EXPLORATION OF VARIATIONS IN POSITIONS OF UPPER AND LOWER INCISORS, OVERJET, OVERBITE, AND IRREGULARITY INDEX IN ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS WITH DISSIMILAR DEPTHS OF CURVE OF SPEE

Authors

  • Nita Kumari THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL KARACHI.
  • Mubassar Fida THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY, KARACHI
  • Attiya Shaikh THE AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY, KARACHI

Abstract

Background: The position and arrangement of teeth as well as the entire scheme of occlusion differs from one individual to the other .The purpose of this study was to examine differences in position and inclination of incisors, overjet, overbite and lower arch crowding in subjects with different depths of curve of Spee and to determine correlations between depth of curve of Spee and these variables. Methods: The sample comprised of 114 patients (55 females and 59 males) with fully erupted permanent second molars (age 12–25 years), having no history of previous orthodontic treatment, no craniofacial anomalies, and no missing permanent teeth. Study parameters were assessed by using pretreatment lateral cephalograms and dental casts of orthodontic patients. The entire sample was divided into three groups according to depth of curve of Spee (mild Spee=38, moderate Spee=38, severe Spee=38). Descriptive statistics were calculated. Differences between the Spee groups were assessed by analysis of variance. In addition, correlation coefficients were calculated between curve of Spee and other parameters. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in upper incisor inclination (p=0.000), lower incisor inclination (p=0.003), Steiner’s mandibular plane angle (p=0.000), overjet (p=0.001), overbite (p=0.000) and irregularity index (p=0.008) among the Spee groups. Moreover, statistically significant positive correlations were found between curve of Spee and overjet, overbite and irregularity index. Upper and lower incisor inclinations as well as mandibular plane angle were found to have statistically significant but negative correlations with curve of Spee. Conclusion: Overjet and overbite in severe Spee group are larger than in mild and moderate Spee groups. There is negative correlation between curve of Spee depth and inclinations of upper and lower incisors. There is positive correlation between curve of Spee depth and severity of lower anterior crowding and Steiner’s mandibular plane angle.Keywords: Deep bite; Curve of Spee; Irregularity index

References

Daskalogiannakis J, Ammann A. Glossary of orthodontic terms. Chicago: Quintessence Books; 2000.

Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62(3):296–309.

Spee FG. The gliding path of the mandible along the skull. Ferdinand Graf spee (1855-1937), prosector at the anatomy institute of Kiel. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100(5):670–5.

Marshall S, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquilino SA, Southard TE. Development of the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134(3):344–52.

Osborn JW. Relationship between the mandibular condyle and the occlusal plane during hominid evolution: some of its effects on jaw mechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1987;73(2):193–207.

Baragar FA, Osborn JW. Efficiency as a predictor of human jaw design in the sagittal plane. J Biomech 1987;20(5):447–57.

McDowell EH, Baker IM. The skeletodental adaptations in deep bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100(4):370–5.

Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Malocclusion traits and symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders in children with severe malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1998;20(5):543–59.

Forsberg CM, Hellsing E. The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction. Eur J Orthod 1984;6(2):107–15.

Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114(1):15–24.

Bernstein RL, Preston CB, Lampasso J. Leveling the curve of Spee with a continuous archwire technique: a long term cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(3):363–71.

Aydogdu E, Ozsoy OP. Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs. bone anchorage. Angle Orthod 2011;81(5):767–75.

Senisik NE, Turkkahraman H. Treatment effects of intrusion arches and mini-implant systems in deep bite patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141(6):723–33.

Ishihara Y, Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Balam TA, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Indirect usage of miniscrew anchorage to intrude overerupted mandibular incisors in a Class II patient with a deep overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143(4 Suppl):S113–24.

Gupta ND, Mahesgwari S, Prabhat KC, Goyal L. A critical review of the management of deep overbite complicated by periodontal diseases. Eur J Gen Dent 2012;1:2–5.

Baydas B, Yavuz I, Atasaral N, Ceylan I, Dagsuyu IM. Investigation of the changes in the positions of upper and lower incisors, overjet, overbite, and irregularity index in subjects with different depths of curve of Spee. Angle Orthod 2004;74(3):349–55.

Jacobson A, Jacobson RL. Radiographic cephalometry: from basics to 3-D imaging. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub.; 2006.

Balridge DW. Leveling the curve of Spee: its effect on the mandibular arch length. J Pract Orthod 1969;3(1):26–41.

Braun S, Hnat WP. Dynamic relationship of the mandibular anterior segment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111(5):518–24.

Woods M. A reassessment of space requirements for lower arch leveling. J Clin Orthod 1986;20(11):770–8.

AlQabandi AK, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. A comparison of the effects of rectangular and round arch wires in leveling the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116(5):522–9.

Braun S, Hnat WP, Johnson BE. The curve of Spee revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110(2):206–10.

Trouten JC, Enlow DH, Rabine M, Phelps AE, Swedlow D. Morphologic factors in open bite and deep bite. Angle Orthod 1983;53(3):192–211.

Orthlieb JD. The curve of Spee: understanding the sagittal organization of mandibular teeth. Cranio 1997;15(4):333–40.

Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TM, Martina R. The curve of Spee and craniofacial morphology: a multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110(4):277–81.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2