• Tariq Mufti
  • Khalid Khan
  • Sajjad A. Malik
  • Tahir Mushtaq


Out of forty cases admitted with abdominal injuries eleven were subjected to diagnosticperitoneal lavage due to inconclusive clinical findings, ten out of eleven cases gave true positive ornegative findings giving high index of reliability, no untoward effects of the procedure wererecorded


Odling Since We and Crockard A. Trauma care. London, Toronto, Sydney, 1991.

Dudley UAL. Emergency surgery. Bristol, 1977.

Slorkey AJ et al. The complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and C.T. in the evaluation of blunt

abdominal trauma, surgery. 1989; 106(4): 794-800.

Rivetti R. el al. Usefulness of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in closed injuries of the abdomen. Minerva Cir. 1985,

;40(17): 1165-6.

Visvana than R. cl al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and

peritrating trauma (Letter). .1. Trauma 1992; 32:671 -2.

Cocks RA et al. How to perform a diagnostic peritoneal lavage? British .1. Hosp. Medicine 1990; 44 (2) 122-3

Loven II., Benjamin Cl Et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. J. Trauma, 1975; 15:854.

Soyka JM et al. diagnostic peritoneal lavage: an isolated WBC count greater than or equal to 500/mm predictive of

intra-abdominal injury' requiring celiotomy in blunt trauma patients. J. Trauma 1990; 30 (7):874-9.

McDonald MA et al. Protein electrophoresis of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in peritrating abdominal trauma a marker

of significant injury. Br. J. Surg. 1989, Dec; 76 (12): 308-10.

Cuschieri A. The acute abdomen and disorders of the peritoneal cavity in essential surgical practice

(Cuschieri A, Giles G.R. Moosa A. R. ed). 1988: 2: 1234, Wright, London, Boston, Wellington.

John 'LG. et al. Liver Trauma: a 10-year experience. B.J. Surg. 1992: 79: 1352-56.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>