POSTOPERATIVE SORE THROAT AFTER ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES
Abstract
Background: Postoperative sore throat is a common complication of anaesthesia and can lead todissatisfaction after surgery. Many factors can contribute to postoperative sore throat and theincidence varies with the method of airway management Methods: In this prospectiveobservational study elective gynaecological and general surgical patients were interviewed 24hours postoperatively to determine the presence of sore throat. Information collected includeddemographic data, surgical procedure, duration of surgery, airway device used and position ofpatient during surgery. This study was done over a period of 3 months. Results: 312 patients wereinterviewed. 81(26%) patients suffered with sore throat postoperatively. 28% of patients withendotracheal intubation (ETT) and 3.5% of patients with laryngeal mask airway had a sore throat.Female patients reported more sore throat than male patients (27.1% vs. 19.1%). Sore throat wasfound to be more common with older age group, grade of difficulty in intubation, duration ofsurgery and patient’s position during surgery. Conclusion: Awareness of the factors responsiblefor increased incidence of postoperative sore throat and appropriate care especially duringendotracheal intubation can help to reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat.Keywords: Anaesthetic complications; Postoperative; Sore throatReferences
McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: cause,
prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia 1999;54:444–53.
Joshi GP, Inagaki Y, White PF, Taylor-Kennedy L, Gevirtz
C, et al. Use of the laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to
the tracheal tube during ambulatory anaesthesia. Anesth
Analg 1997;85:573-77.
Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat
after ambulatory surgery. Brit J Anaesth 2002;88(4):582–4.
Keller C, Sparr HJ, Brimacombe JR. Laryngeal mask
lubrication – a comparative study of saline versus 2%
lignocaine gel with cuff pressure control. Anaesthesia
;52:586-602.
Racial and gender differences in outcome after carotid
endarterectomy. Am Surg 1998;64(6):527-32.
Pelletier SJ, Isaacs RB, Raymond DP, Carbtree TD, Spencer
CE, Gleason TG, et al. Ethnic disparities in outcome from
posttransplant infections. Shock. 2004; 22(3):197-203.
Horner RD, Oddone EZ, Stechuchak KM, Grambow SC,
Gray J, Khuri SF, et al. Racial variations in postoperative
outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: evidence from the
Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement
Program. Med Care. 2002 Jan;40(1 Suppl):135-43.
Czerska B, Stewart RW, Hobbs RE, Klein AL, Lever H,
Rincon G, et al. Hypertension and left ventricular
hypertrophy in black vs white heart transplant patients 1 year
after surgery. Ethn Dis. 1991 Fall;1(4):335-41.
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.