FACTORS RELATED INTENTION TO SMOKING CESSATION AMONG THAI PEOPLE WHO JOINED QUIT SMOKING PROJECT FOR THE KING: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF NORTHERN THAILAND
AbstractBackground: Smoking causes direct and indirect health problems among people. The purpose of this paper is to explore factors influencing intention to cessation smoking among Thai people who joined quit smoking project for the King. Methods: This cross-sectional study survey. The samples of 626 participants were recruited to the study. They were randomly selected by using stratified multi-stage cluster sampling from community area of Phayao and Nan Provinces. The data was analysed using Pearson product-moment correlation. Factors influencing intention to quit smoking were analysed using multiple linear regression. Results: The results showed that participants’ perception towards health consequences of smoking was at low level (35.1%). Participants’ communication skills, decision making, and self-management were at fair level (35.5%,41.8% and 43.0% respectively). There were statistically significant relationships between personal factors and intention to cessation smoking among participants in the quit smoking project (p=.007). It was found that factors including intention to cessation smoking, joining the program, receive invitation to join the program, and participants’ willingness to participate in the program had statistically significant relationships with quit smoking (p<.001), (p<.001), (p<.001) and (p<0.009). There were statistically significant relationships of knowledge and communication skills on intention to cessation smoking (p=.030) and (p=.039) respectively. Conclusion: Furthermore, they are willing to cooperate with public health personnel regarding to prevention and control of smoking. Therefore, quit smoking campaign by using health communication will help approaching people in the public and enhance knowledge and understanding among people in term of health effects and consequences of smoking.Keywords: Smoking cessation; Quit smoking for king; Northern Thailand
WHO. Report the top 10 causes of death. [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2012. [cited 2018 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index2.html
Vathesatogkit P. Tobacco: a threat to development. Action on smoking and health foundation Thailand. [Internet] 2016. [cited 2018 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.ashthailand.or.th/th/no_tobacco_day_page.php?id=1085
Preechawong S, Nuchsongsin F, Pittayarangsarit S. Reviews on Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions among Patients with Chronic Diseases. J Public Health 2015;45(3):324–33.
Pittayarangsarit S. The Situation of Tobacco Control in Thailand: 2016. Bureau of Tobacco Control Ministry of Public Health. [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2018 Aug 7]. Available from: http://www.trc.or.th/th/images/upload/files/data/tobaccoinfo/2017/Situation2016final.pdf
Ministry of Public Health. Situation report on surveillance for tobacco control. Bureau of Tobacco Control. 2015. [cited Aug 2018 7]. Available from: http://btc.ddc.moph.go.th/th/upload/datacenter/data38.pdf
Ministry of Public Health. Annual Report Bureau of Tobacco Control: 2015. Department of Disease Control. [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2018 Aug 7]. Available from: http://btc.ddc.moph.go.th/th/upload/datacenter/annual_report_btc_2558.pdf
Ministry of Public Health. Quit for king policy. Bureau of Tobacco Control. [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2018 Aug 7]. Available from: http://www.quitforking.com/pages/view/history
Bureau of Tobacco Control. Quit for king project. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2017 Dec]. Available from: http://www.quitforking.com/defaults/summary
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Measur 1970;30(3):607–10.
Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP Model for Evalutaion. In Stufflebeam DL, Madaus GF, Kellaghan T, editors. Evalutaion Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. 2000; p.280-317.
Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. New York: Guilford; 1983.
Kitpredaborisut B. Research methods in social science. 11th ed. Bangkok: Chamjuri Product; 2010.
Khasemophas D, Rojanaprasert P. Effects of family participation model for smoking cessation in Thai family. Thai J Cardio-Thorac Nurs 2015;26(2):81–93.
Ramkhuan C, Khuwatsamritc K, Panpakdee O. Factors related to smoking cessation behavior among patients after coronary artery bypass graft. Thai J Cardio-Thorac Nurs 2016;27(2):2–16.
McKee SA, O’Malley SS, Salovey P, Krishnan-Sarin S, Mazure CM. Perceived risks and benefits of smoking cessation: gender-specific predictors of motivation and treatment outcome. Addict Behav 2005;30(3):423–35.
Ajzen I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editor. Action Control. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1985.
Macy JT, Middlestadt SE, Seo DC, Kolbe LJ, Jay SJ. Applying the theory of planned behavior to explore the relation between smoke free air laws and quilting intentions. Health Educ Behav 2012;39(1):27–34.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Pender NJ. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice, 3rd ed. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange; 1996.
Sittiwong S. Influence of public media on intention not to smoke among students at lower secondary school level: assessment of the office of educational services Trat province. J Public Health 2015;45(1):97–111.
Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj Manag J 1999;30(4):25–32.