STATUS OF ETHICAL REVIEW BOARDS AT ALL MEDICAL COLLEGES OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

Authors

  • Saidul Abrar Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Katrina Aminah Ronis Health Services Academy, Islamabad
  • Shahid Khan Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Sumbal Siraj Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Wajeeha Safdar Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Yamna Khalid Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Ayesha Amjad Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Sonia Akhtar Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Haleema Abdullah Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Tayeba Alam Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College Abbottabad
  • Nukhba Mahmood Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Samea Noor Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Warda Haroon Department of Community Medicine, Women Medical College, Abbottabad

Abstract

Background: Ethics means custom, character, habit or disposition and as a discipline is frequently called Moral Philosophy. Ethics cannot be regulated until it is incorporated in Law. With the advent of research in life sciences, the need of ethical review boards was felt to protect individual and public interests. The objective of this study was to know the status of ethical review boards at all medical colleges of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in terms of its existence, membership and activities. Methods: This province wise cross-sectional survey was conducted over a period of three months. All the sixteen medical colleges of the province registered with Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Islamabad were included. A structured questionnaire was used as data collection tool. Single respondent from each medical college was identified by the respective chief executive officer or principal. Data was analysed through SPSS V-20 and MS Excel 2007. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative data. Results: Out of sixteen medical colleges, one had no ethical review board and another neither refused nor returned filled questionnaire. Eleven medical colleges reported combined boards with their teaching hospitals, while 3 had separate boards. Highest number of members noted was 14 and lowest being 4. Mode was 8. None of the boards had a medical doctor with degree or diploma in bioethics, as its member. Six medical colleges had medical doctors who had attended workshops on bioethics. Majority of medical colleges had no track of record about its review boards. Conclusion: Overall situation of ethical review boards at the medical colleges of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is not satisfactory and needs proper regulatory measures.Keywords: Institutional Review Board, Ethics Committee, Bioethics, Pakistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

References

Singer P. Ethics Philosophy[Internet]. [updated May 3rd 2015; cited 2014 April 2]; Available from: http://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy.

Hulkower R. The History of the Hippocratic Oath: Outdated,Inauthentic, and Yet Still Relevant. Einstein J Biol Med 2010:25(26):41–4.

McGill University Health Centre. The Nuremberg Code – DIRECTIVES FOR HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION [Internet]. [cited 2014 April 5].Available from: https://muhc.ca/sites/default/files/users/user136/The%20Nuremberg%20Code.pdf.

Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects[Internet]. Seoul: World Medical Association; 2008; [cited 2014 April 28]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf

Sherin A. Research ethics committees (RECs) and monitoring of biomedical research in Pakistan. Khyber Med Univ J 2013;s(3):121–2.

The Belmont report [Internet]. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research;1979[cited 2014 June 15]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

Beauchamp T L, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

Research ethics committees: Basic concepts for capacity-building [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization ;2009[cited 2014 April 30].Available from: www.who.int/ethics/Ethics_basic_concepts_ENG.pdf

Institutional Review Board Guidebook [Internet].Saylor academy [cited 2014 April 30].Available from: http://www.saylor.org/site/wp- content/uploads/2011/08/ PSYCH202A-3.1.4-Institutional-Review-Board.pdf

Karlberg JPE,editor. Reviewing Clinical Trials: A Guide for the Ethics Committee. Hongkong : Karlberg, Johan Petter Einar;2010.p25.

Ethics [Internet].Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 2013[cited 2014 May 1].Available from: http://www.cioms.ch/index.php/2012-06-10-08-47-53/ethics

Research ethics[Internet].Geneva: World Health Organization ;2014[cited 2014 May 1].Available from: http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/en

Jafarey AM, Iqbal SP, Hassan M. Ethical review in Pakistan: the credibility gap. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62(12):1355.

National Bioethics Committee (NBC)[Internet]. Islamabad:Pakistan Medical and Research Council;2004[cited 2014 May 5].Available from: http://www.pmrc.org.pk/NBC%20Guidelines.htm

Nishtar S, Mehboob AB. Pakistan prepares to abolish Ministry of Health. Lancet 2011;378:648–9.

Jafarey AM.A degree in bioethics: an “introspective” analysis from Pakistan. Indian J Med Ethics 2014;11(2):93–9.

European Textbook on Ethics in Research. [Internet]. Luxemberg: European Commission ; 2010[ cited 2014 May 7]. Available from : http://ec.europa.eu/research/ science society/document_library/pdf_06/textbook-on-ethics-report_en.pdf

Ana J, Koehlmoos T, Smith R, Yan L. Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS Med 2013; 10(3):e1001315

Iqbal S. The birth,growth and development of BIGS. Pakistan J

Med Ethics 2009;10(1):9.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-20