SATISFACTION OF TRAINEES WITH FAMILY MEDICINE TRAINING PROGRAM: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY FROM QASSIM, SAUDI ARABIA
AbstractBackground: Focus on quality of postgraduate training has increased. One of the quality indicators is satisfaction of trainees with the residency programs. We aimed to assess the level of satisfaction of Saudi Board family medicine trainees with training program in Qassim. Methods: Anonymized online survey, using a structured questionnaire, was conducted among the current family medicine residents (n = 60) in Qassim in 2019. Descriptive analyses were carried out to calculate frequencies of the responses. Satisfaction level was compared between basic (R1, R2) and advance (R3, R4) levels using Chi-square test. Results: About 67% (40) were basic level trainees. A higher proportion (>80%) of trainees was satisfied with the program director. Satisfaction with trainers ranged 45% to 85% for different items. About 79% of the trainees were satisfied with the training program organization. In the domain of training processes higher proportion (73–83%) was satisfied with supervision and feedback while a lower proportion (63–68%) was satisfied with evaluations. Proportion of satisfied trainees in the domain of hospital rotations was lowest (43%) for academic activities in the hospitals. About family medicine rotations, a higher proportion (75%) was satisfied with academic activities. Higher proportion of trainees (78–86%) was satisfied with research facilitation and supervision. Mean score for overall satisfaction was 7.63 out of 10. Conclusion: The results of this study would help focus on certain domains to improve the quality of program. We recommend family medicine programs to regularly carry out such surveys for continuous quality improvement.Keywords: Family Medicine; Residents; Satisfaction; Training; Saudi Arabia
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005;83(3):457–502.
Roberts RG, Hunt VR, Kulie TI, Schmidt W, Schirmer JM, Villanueva T, et al. Family medicine training-the international experience. Med J Aust 2011;194:S84–7.
Manson H. The need for medical ethics education in family medicine training. Fam Med 2008;40(9):658–64.
Wolfrom B, Hodgetts G, Kotecha J, Pollock E, Martin M, Han H, et al. Satisfaction with civilian family medicine residency training: Perspectives from serving general duty medical officers in the Canadian Armed Forces. Can Fam Physician 2016;62(9):e540–6.
Young R, Webb A, Lackan N, Marchand L. Family medicine residency educational characteristics and career satisfaction in recent graduates. Fam Med 2008;40(7):484–91.
Randall C, Bergus G, Schlechte J, McGuinness G, Mueller C. Factors associated with primary care residents' satisfaction with their training. Fam Med 1997;29(10):730–5.
Serwint JR, Feigelman S, Dumont-Driscoll M, Collins R, Zhan M, Kittredge D, et al. Factors associated with resident satisfaction with their continuity experience. Ambul Pediatr 2004;4(1):4–10.
Al-Shehri AM. Quality management and medical education in Saudi Arabia. Qual Manag Pract 2012;27:67.
Bush JS. Recommendations for the future of family medicine. Fam Pract Manag 2004;11(4):34.
Yaman H, Ozen M. Satisfaction with family medicine training in Turkey: survey of residents. Croat Med J 2002;43(1):54–7.
Abdulrahman KAB, Al-Dakheel A. Family medicine residency program in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Residents opinion. Pak J Med Sci 2006;22(3):250–7.
Carney PA, Waller E, Dexter E, Marino M, Rosener SE, Green LA, et al. Association between patient-centered medical home features and satisfaction with family medicine residency training in the US. Fam Med 2016;48(10):784–94.
Al-Khaldi YM, AlDawood KM, AlKhudeer BK, AlSaqqaf AA. Satisfaction of trainees of Saudi Diploma Family Medicine, Saudi Arabia. Educ Prim Care 2016;27(5):421–3.
Zuhairah ARA, Al-Dawood KM, Khamis AH. Family medicine training in Saudi Arabia: Are there any variations among different regions? J Fam Community Med 2015;22(2):106–10.
Mbuka DO, Tshitenge S, Setlhare V, Tsima B, Adewale G, Parsons L. New family medicine residency training programme: Residents' perspectives from the University of Botswana. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2016;8(1):1–8.
Al-Khaldi YM, AlDawood KM, AlKhudeer BK, AlSaqqaf AA. Residents Satisfaction with Training Environment of Saudi Diploma of Family Medicine, Saudi Arabia. Int J Community Fam Med 2017;2:128.
Khoja AT. Evaluation of the educational environment of the Saudi family medicine residency training program. J Fam Community Med 2015;22(1):49–56.
University of Toronto. five-years-of-the-resident-exit-survey-2005-2006-to-2009-2010. [Internet]. University of Toronto [cited 2020 Jan]. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/46574578/five-years-of-the-resident-exit-survey-2005-2006-to-2009-2010.
Šter MP, Kezunović LC, Cojić M, Petek D, Švab I. Specialty training in family medicine in Montenegro–An evaluation of the programme by the first generation of trainees. Zdr Varst 2018;57(2):96–105.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.