• Tariq Masood Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
  • Riaz Ahmed Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
  • Obaidullah . Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar


Background: Distally based sural fascio-cutaneous flap is a commonly performed plastic surgery procedure for the coverage of distal third of leg, ankle and foot defects. However congestion is the main complication of this flap which results into partial or complete loss of the flap. We devised a special splint to reduce this complication and retrospectively reviewed its effect on this complication between two groups. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at Northwest General hospital between 1995 and 2012. Group-A included 30 patients who were managed without the splint between 1995 and 2005 and group B comprised of 35 patients were treated with the splint between 2006 and 2012. Complications like venous congestion, epidermolysis, and partial and complete flap failure were documented. Data were analyzed by SPSS.16.5 software. Chi- square test was used for data analysis. P value less than 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results: Total 65 patients were operated. Age of the patients ranged from 7 to 60 years.  Road traffic accident and spoke wheel injury was the main cause of soft tissue loss in our patients. In group A 12 patients suffered from venous congestion. Out of 12, three patients had epidermolysis while partial flap necrosis occurred in 9 patients. Only 3 patients had venous congestion in group B. Two patients suffered from epidermolysis and one had partial flap necrosis. None of patient suffered from complete flap loss in both groups. Conclusion: Reverse sural artery flap continues to be a versatile flap for distal lower extremity reconstruction. By using a special splint to reduce pressure on the pedicle site as a modification, flap complication rate can be decreased significantly.


Nasaipour H, Steele MH. Anterolateral thigh free flap for “head to toe” reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2011;66(5):530–3.

Schmidt K, Jakubietz M, Djalek S, Harenberg PS, Zeplin PH, Jakubietz R. The distally based adipofascial sural artery flap:Faster,safer and easier? A long term comparison of the fasciocutaneous and adipofascial method in a multimorbidpatient population. Plas Reconstr Surg 2012;130(2):360–8.

Baumeister SP, Spierer R, Erdmann D, Sweis R, Levin LS, Germann GK. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112(1):129–40.

Akhtar S, Hamid A. Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects. J PlastReconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59(8):839–45.

Egozi D, Fodor L, Ullmann Y. Salvage of compromised free flaps in trauma cases with combined modalities. Microsurgery 2011;31(2):109–15.

Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz DF, Gruenert JG, Schmidt K, Meffert RH, Jakubietz MG. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the Achilles tendon with rotation flaps,pedicled propeller flaps and free perforator flaps. Microsurgery 2010;30(8):135–8.

Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves:Anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89(6):1115–21.

Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S, Minabe T, Fukui Y, Miyasaka T, et al. Accompanying arteries of the lesser saphenous vein and sural nerve.Anatomic study and its clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103(1):104–20.

Hsieh CH, Liang CC, Kueh NS, Tsai HH, Jeng SF. Distally based sural island flap for the reconstruction of a large soft tissue defect in an open tibial fracture with occluded anterior and posterior tibial arteries-a case report. Br J Plast Surg 2005;58(1):112–5.

Chen SL, Chen TM, Chou TD, Chang SC, Wang HJ. Distally based sural fasciomusculocutaneous flap for chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54(1):44–8.

Rashid M, Masood T, Hameed S, Sarwar S-R. Superficial sural artery flap: a simple solution for difficult heel defects. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2001;11:319–23.

Kneser U, Bach AD, Polykandriotis E, Kopp J, Horch RE. Delayed reverse sural flap for staged reconstruction of the foot and lower leg. Plast Reconst Surg 2005;116(7):1910–7.

Maffi TR, Knoetgen J 3rd, Turner NS, Moran SL. Enhancing survival using the distally based sural artery interpolation flap. Annls Plast Surg 2005;54(3):302–5.

Afifi AM, Mahboub TA, Losee JE, Smith DM, Khalil HH. The reverse sural flap:Modifications to improve efficacy in foot and ankle reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61(4):430–6.

Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Recon Surg 2007;119(6):138e–48e.

Foran MP, Schreiber J, Christy MR, Goldberg NH, Silverman RP. The modified reverse sural artery flap lower extremity reconstruction. J Trauma 2008;64(1):139–43.



Most read articles by the same author(s)